PRE-ECLAMPSIA AND THE IMPACT ON CHIROPRACTIC MANAGEMENT OF THE PREGNANT PATIENT
 
   

Pre-Eclampsia and the Impact
on Chiropractic Management
of the Pregnant Patient

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:
   Frankp@chiro.org
 
   

FROM:   J Clin Chiropractic Pediatrics 2012 (Dec);   14 (1):   1032–1036 ~ FULL TEXT

Sharon Gordon, BAppSc(Chiro), DICCP and Sherryn Silverthorne, M Clinical Chiro, RN, RM

Sharon Gordon, BAppSc(Chiro), DICCP
Private Practice,
Gippsland, Victoria, Australia
Sharon.gordon@rmit.edu

Sherryn Silverthorne, M Clinical Chiro, RN, RM
Private Practice,
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia



Up to 10% of women develop pre-eclampsia during pregnancy. It is a significant cause of mortality, responsible for 10-15% of maternal deaths. Its diagnosis is based on the presence of hypertension, with or without proteinuria and edema. As primary contact health care providers, chiropractors must be aware of the risk factors, clinical signs of pre-eclampsia, and the need to modify their management appropriately. An open internet search was conducted for current guidelines in scientific journal databases, in the diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia. Although there is little literature outlining the role of the chiropractor in patient management, it is clear that specific history and examination procedures must be performed for appropriate co-management and referral.

Key Words:   pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, toxemia, hypertension, pregnancy, chiropractic


From the Full-Text Article:

Introduction

Pre-eclampsia (also known as toxemia of pregnancy) is one of the major causes of maternal mortality and morbidity. 10%-15% of maternal deaths are directly associated with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. [1] Up to 10% of pregnant women develop pre-eclampsia. [2] The incidence of pre-eclampsia in the nulliparous woman is cited as being between 3%-7% and for the multiparous woman 1%-3%. [1, 3] This diagnosis is based on the presence of hypertension, proteinuria, with or without edema. As primary contact health care providers, chiropractors must be aware of the risk factors, clinical signs of pre-eclampsia, and the need to modify their management appropriately.


Objective

To review the diagnostic criteria, risk factors and complications of pre-eclampsia, and discuss how this may affect chiropractic management of the pregnant patient.


Methods

An open literature search of ‘pre-eclampsia’,‘preeclampsia’, ‘eclampsia’, and ‘toxemia of pregnancy’, was conducted. In addition, these terms were combined with ‘chiropractic’. Other terms entered in combination with ‘chiropractic’ were ‘pregnancy’ and ‘hypertension’. The search was performed with Google, and journal databases PubMed, Medline, Proquest, Cochrane, CINAHL, Medscape, and Index to Chiropractic Literature. Collectively, more than 20,000 articles have been published in scientific journals on ‘pre-eclampsia’, ‘preeclampsia’, ‘eclampsia’ and ‘toxemia of pregnancy’. There were no articles found on chiropractic management of these conditions. In this paper, 29 articles were cited. Six of these were RCTs, 17 were reviews of literature, and 5 were surveys, commentary, cross-sectional studies, case studies and media publications. Inclusion was based on year of publication (2000-2012), research design (RCT and Review of literature prioritized), publication in a peer-reviewed journal, the number of citations of the given article (higher rate of citation given priority), other publications by author, and articles with unique insight into the topic.


Clinical Presentation

A diagnosis of pre-eclampsia in the pregnant patient is made in the presence of hypertension and proteinuria, with or without edema. [4, 5]

Hypertension may be considered mild to moderate (Blood pressure greater than 140/90mmHg) or severe (Blood pressure greater than 160/110mmHg). The severe form often features hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP syndrome, which occurs in approximately 5% of pre-eclamptic patients). [5, 9]

A 2011 study of 400 pregnant women, 100 hypertensive, found that mean arterial pressure was a better predictor of pre-eclampsia in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. Third trimester was best measured by systolic and diastolic blood pressure. [6]

Proteinuria may be detected by a dipstick urinalysis. A protein sample of 30 mg, which is equal to >+1 is diagnostic. It must be found in 2 or more random urine samples, at least 4-6 hr apart, but no more than 7 days apart. Alternatively, a 24-hour urine test greater than or equal to 0.3g is positive for proteinuria. [1]

Diagnosis of edema is subjective, based on observation, and manual palpation. It is usually performed at the lower extremity about the ankle, where the practitioner assesses for bilateral pitting edema, consistent with that found in pre-eclampsia. [1, 7]

A review of literature by Sibai in 2005 found that ‘Other than early detection of preeclampsia, there are no reliable tests or symptoms for predicting the development of eclampsia’. [8]

The exact cause of pre-eclampsia is unknown. Placental vascular dysfunction is linked to the cascade of events and symptoms. A review of the literature suggests “alterations of placental vessels required for adequate perfusion of the placenta, which leads to ischemia. The mechanisms that link the ischemic placenta to endothelial lesions and to stimulation of vasoconstrictors and inhibition of vasodilators are still subject of speculation.” [9]


Co-morbidities

Other clinical findings may be seen in the preeclamptic patient. These include, but are not limited to, hyper-reflexia, clonus, visual disturbances, epigastric pain, and headaches.

Onset of symptoms is usually around 20 weeks gestation with hypertension and proteinuria, with or without peripheral edema. [5, 10]

A case report in 2002 documented the case of a 28-year old women in her 37th week of pregnancy, experiencing reversible cortical blindness due to vasogenic edema. One month postpartum, her vision returned to 20/20. [11]


Complications

Complications for the pregnant mother include eclampsia (pre-eclampsia plus seizures, occurring every 1/250 pre-eclamptic patients), [12] rapid weight gain, DIC, nausea, vomiting, headaches, visual disturbance, hyper-reflexia, clonus, convulsions, cerebral ischemia, right upper quadrant pain or epigastric pain, HELLP syndrome. [13]

A retrospective study of 453 pre-eclamptic patients found that giving birth by cesarean section increased the risk of complication during the post-partum period. [13] In a critical review of the literature, Rinehart et al in 1999, found the three most common symptoms of preeclampsia associated hepatic haemorrhage were epigastric pain, hypertension and shock. [14]

For the fetus, they include death, placental insufficiency, growth restriction and premature delivery. [7, 10] A study of 239 pregnant women by Haddad, Kayem, Deis, Sibai in 2006, found that in severe cases of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction, risk of death was higher in the fetus, but had no impact on maternal complications. [15]

A pregnant patient with pre-eclampsia is considered ‘high risk’ due to the potential complications of gestation and delivery. For this reason, management is predominately overseen by an obstetrician and/or midwife.


Risk Factors

The following are documented risk factors for the development of pre-eclampsia in the pregnant woman: Age over 40, nulliparity or history of pre-eclampsia, family history of pre-eclampsia, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, renal disease, fetal congenital abnormality, and characteristics such as twin or molar pregnancy, autoimmune disease, antiphospholipid syndrome, longer intervals between pregnancies, high BMI (Body mass index >25), and proteinuria. [1, 3, 4, 16]

In a systematic review of controlled trials, Kirsten Duckitt’s controlled cohort studies showed that the risk of pre-eclampsia is increased in women with a previous history of pre-eclampsia, those with antiphospholipids antibodies, pre-existing diabetes, multiple (twin) pregnancy, nulliparity, family history, raised blood pressure (diastolic ≥ 80 mm Hg) at booking, raised body mass index before or at booking or maternal age ≥ 40. Other studies, also noted interval of 10 years or more since a previous pregnancy, autoimmune disease, renal disease, and chronic hypertension all increase the risk of developing pre-eclampsia. [3]

A Taiwanese hospital study confirmed that BMI> 24kg/m2 increased the risk of diabetes, pre-eclampsia and pre-term labor. [7]

A multi-centre placebo-control study looked at 4,589 nulliparous women to identify pre-eclampsia risk factors, and whether it was impacted by calcium supplementation. They found raised body mass, as well as with increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased the risk of pre-eclampsia. These results were independent of calcium supplementation. [18]


Medical Management

Medical management involves routine monitoring of blood pressure and urinalysis. Magnesium sulfate is given for severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. It has been shown to significantly lower the risk of eclampsia and maternal death, but no impact on fetal death. [19, 20] Antihypertensive medications are only recommended in the presence of other complicating factors. There is insufficient evidence to support the many recommended lifestyle changes (aerobic exercise, altered protein intake, Vitamin C, Vitamin E), however low-dose aspirin, calcium and fish oil supplementation have the strongest evidence. [21-23]

The World Health Organization RCT on calcium supplementation for pregnant women found that it did not prevent pre-eclampsia, but did reduce severity, maternal morbidity and neonatal mortality. [24]

In a review of the literature, Rossi & Mullen (2011) looked at vitamins C and E and low-dose aspirin supplementation for the prevention of pre-eclampsia. They found no evidence to support their role in prophylaxis. [25]

A double blind RCT investigated fish oil supplementation for the prevention of gestational diabetes and preeclampsia. They found that supplementation in the first half of pregnancy had no impact on the incidence of either. [26]


Chiropractic Management

There is little evidence documenting chiropractic management, or evidence of its impact on natural history. With commonly associated symptoms such as hypertension and diabetes, chiropractic management must be modified to accommodate the patient with pre-eclampsia and its risk factors.

Chiropractors are primary health care practitioners. Therefore, initial consult with the pregnant patient should include screening for pre-eclampsia risk factors in the health history. Examination should also include a baseline blood pressure analysis, regardless of gestation. In the presence of hypertension in a pregnant patient, the chiropractic clinician should refer for medical co-management as appropriate.

Follow-up chiropractic management may include the following:

  • Regular screening for recent onset of pre-eclampsia symptoms such as edema, rapid weight gain, visual disturbances, headaches, etc. from 20 weeks gestation.

  • Monthly monitoring of blood pressure, and indicators for neurological re-examination.

  • Modify care using low-force chiropractic techniques, or in some cases, be aware of contraindications to cervical adjusting.

  • Lifestyle advice on lowering BMI in the pre-natal period, or between pregnancies

  • Dietary counselling on foods appropriate for diabetes and optimal health

With the increased risk of pre-eclampsia in subsequent pregnancies it is vital for the chiropractor to work with the woman to urge a healthy lifestyle. [27]


Discussion

In a recent review on the management of pre-eclampsia by Petitt and Brown (2012), published in the European journal of obstetrics and gynecology, it was noted that ‘the extensive vascular and metabolic long-term associations with pre-eclampsia are now apparent and as clinicians we have a major responsibility to urge healthy lifestyle for these women after any pre-eclamptic pregnancy. [27]

A cross-sectional survey of 112 pregnant women investigated their knowledge of pre-eclampsia symptoms, consequences and actions. They concluded that women generally have a poor understanding of pre-eclampsia that improved with patient education, with the potential to reduce the risk of complications. [28]

A prospective cohort study in 2010 looked at the accuracy of women self-reporting pre-eclampsia. This was thought to be lack of patient-doctor communication. It reinforces the need of all health practitioners to appropriately monitor and educate their patients on preeclampsia. [29]


Conclusion

Pre-eclampsia is a significant cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. It carries known risk factors, and classic clinical symptoms, which the chiropractor must be aware of, along with their impact on management. There is extensive medical research into pre-eclampsia, but little research documented in the chiropractic literature. Further research is needed in the area of chiropractic-based and adjunctive techniques, to determine their impact on patient outcomes.


REFERENCES:

  1. Uzan J, Carbonnel M, Piconne O, Asmar R, Ayoubi J M.
    Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.
    Vasc Health Risk Manag 2011; 7:467-474

  2. Berkane N.
    Gestational hypertension: definitions and consequences in outcome of pregnancy.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20304596
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2010 Mar; 29(3):e1-6. Epub 2010 Mar 20

  3. Duckitt K, Harrington D.
    Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies.
    BMJ 2005; 330:565

  4. Ronnaug A, Vatten L, Tore S, Kjell A, Rigmor A.
    Risk factors and clinical manifestations of pre-eclampsia.
    BJOG 2000 November; 107(11):1410-1416.

  5. Backes C H, Markham K, Moorehead P, Cordero L, Nankervis C A, Giannone P.
    Maternal preeclampsia and neonatal outcomes.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21547086
    J Pregnancy 2011; 214365. Epub 2011 Apr 4

  6. Jasovic-Siveska E, Jasovic V.
    Prediction of mild and severe preeclampsia with blood pressure measurements in first and second trimester of pregnancy.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22384618
    Ginekol Pol 2011 Nov; 82(11):845-50

  7. Bell M J,
    A Historical Overview of Preeclampsia-Eclampsia.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=20919997
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2010 September; 39(5):510-518

  8. Sibai, BM.
    Diagnosis, prevention, and management of eclampsia.
    Obstet Gynecol February 2005; 105(2):402-410

  9. Irminger-Finger I, Jastrow N, Irion O.
    Preeclampsia: A danger growing in disguise.
    J Biochem Cell Biol 2008; 40(10);1979-1983

  10. Hypertension in pregnancy, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. 10 August 2010.
    Website accessed March 19th 2012.
    http://3centres.com.au/guidelines/hypertension-in-pregnancy-preeclampsia-andeclampsia/

  11. Do D, Rismondo V, Nguyen Q.
    Reversible cortical blindness in preeclampsia.
    Am J Opthalmol 2002; 134(6):916-918

  12. Brown M, Lowe S.
    Current management of pre-eclampsia.
    MJA 2009; 190 (1):3-4

  13. Derulle P, Coudoux E, Ego A, Houfflin-Debarge V, Codaccioni X, Subtill D.
    Risk factors for post-partum complications occurring after preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 125(1):59-65

  14. Rinehart B, Terrone D, Magann E, Martin R, May W, Martin J.
    Preeclampsia-associated hepatic haemorrhage and rupture: Mode of management related to maternal and perinatal outcome.
    Obstetrical & Gynaecological Survey 1999; 54(3):196-202

  15. Haddad B, Kayem G, Deis S, Sibai B.
    Are perinatal and maternal outcomes different during expectant management of severe pre-eclampsia in the presence of intra-uterine growth restriction?
    Obstet Gynecol March 2007; 196(3): 237
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%2522Hutcheon%20JA%2522%255BAuthor%255D
    Hutcheon JA,
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%2522Lisonkova%20S%2522%255BAuthor%255D. Lisonkova S,
    http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%2522Joseph%20KS%2522%255B Author%255
    D. Joseph KS.
    Epidemiology of pre-eclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21333604
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2011 Aug; 25(4):391-403. Epub 2011 Feb 18

  16. Tsai IH, Chen CP, Sun FJ, Wu CH, Yeh Sl.
    Associations of the pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with pregnancy outcomes in Taiwanese women.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22374564
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2012; 21(1):82-7

  17. Sibai BM, Ewell M, Levine RJ, Klebanoff MA, Esterlitz J, Catalano PM, Goldenberg RL, Joffe G.
    Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women.
    Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177(5):1003-1010

  18. Altman D, Carroli G, Duley L, Farrell B, Moodley J, Neilson J, Smith D.
    Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The magpie trial: a randomised placebo-control trial.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12057549
    Lancet 2002 Jun 1; 359(9321):1877-90

  19. Duley L, Gulmezoglu AM, Henderson-Smart DJ.
    Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12804383
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(2):CD000025

  20. Duley L.
    Pre-eclampsia and the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
    Br Med Bull (2003) 67 (1):161-176

  21. Coomarasamy A, Honest H, Papaioannou S, Gee H, Khan KS.
    Aspirin for prevention of preeclampsia in women with historical risk factors: a systematic review.
    Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:1319-1332

  22. Rumbold A, Duley L, Crowther CA, Haslam RR.
    Anti-oxidants for preventing pre-eclampsia.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18254042
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 Jan 23

  23. Villar J. et al.
    World Health Organization randomized trial ofcalcium supplementation among low calcium intake pregnant women.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16522392
    Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006 Mar; 194(3):639-49

  24. Rossi A, Mullin P.
    Prevention of pre-eclampsia with low-dose aspirin or vitamins C or E in women at high or low risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21641104
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011 Sep; 158(1): 9-16

  25. Zhou SJ, Yelland L, McPhee AJ, Quinlivan J, Gibson RA, Makrides M.
    Fish oil supplementation in pregnancy does not reduce the risk of gestational diabetes or pre-eclampsia. http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22552037. Am J Clin Nutr 2012 Jun; 95(6): 1378-84. Epub 2012 May 2

  26. Pettit F,
    http://www.ejog.org/article/S0301-2115%2811%2900568-9/fulltext? articleId=S0020-7292%2802%2900008-5&articleTitle=Urinary+protein+ excretion+and+expectant+management+of+early+onset%2C+severe+pre-eclampsia&citedBy=false&isTabularSearchRequestOnSearchResultPage= no&medlinePmidWithoutMDLNPrefix=&overridingDateRestriction=&related= true&restrictdesc_author=&restrictDescription=&restrictterm_author=& search=&search_area=platform&search_ articletype=&search_currenturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.journals.elsevierhealth.com%2Fperio.
    Brown MA.
    The management of pre-eclampsia: what we think we know.
    Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012
    http://www.ejog.org/issues?issue_key=S0301-2115%2811%29X0013-1. 160 (1):6-12

  27. You WB, Wolf M, Bailey SC, Pandit AU, Waite KR, Sobel RM, Grobman W.
    Factors associated with patient understanding of preeclampsia.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20860492
    Hypertens Pregnancy 2010 Sep 22

  28. Coolman M, de Groot CJ, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Raat H, Steegers EA.
    Medical record validation of maternally reported history of pre-eclampsia.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20189760
    J Clin Epidemiol 2010 Aug; 63(8):932-7 Epub 2010 Mar 2



Return to the PEDIATRICS Section

Return to the CHIROPRACTIC AND FEMALE ISSUES Page

Since 8-03-2014

         © 1995–2017 ~ The Chiropractic Resource Organization ~ All Rights Reserved