- Chiropractic Resource Organization.     Support Chiropractic Research!

Chiropractic Associations Describe Chiropractic Care Using Conventional Terminology

Home/Guidelines/Chiropractic Associations Describe Chiropractic Care Using Conventional Terminology

Source The American Chiropractic Association

The Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters (CCGPP), with assistance from the American Chiropractic Association (ACA), has established terminology that describes chiropractic care using conventionally recognized terminology across the accepted continuum of care. The terminology was established by a formal consensus process conducted in early 2009.

The chiropractic profession is making great strides with integration among health care providers and insurers. Doctors of chiropractic now practice in many military and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) sites, in hospital settings and in a variety of integrated practice models. As our nation’s health care landscape changes and the primary care shortage becomes more acute, the stage will be set for even more integration of doctors of chiropractic among other health care providers—traditional and alternative. Therefore, it is vital that the scope of appropriate chiropractic care be clearly defined relative to overall patient case management.

The terminology that was established by the CCGPP consensus process relates to levels of care across the spectrum from acute care, to chronic/recurrent care and on to wellness care. The process specifically defined the following:

  • Care of acute conditions – Medically necessary care of acute conditions is care that is reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of a patient with a health concern and for which there is a therapeutic care plan and a goal of functional improvement and/or pain relief. The result of the care is expected to be an improvement, arrest, or retardation of the patient’s condition. Initially, the care may be more frequent, but as levels of improvement are reached, a decrease in the frequency of care is to be expected. A patient may experience exacerbations of an acute injury/illness being treated that may clinically require an increased frequency of care for short periods of time. A patient may also experience a recurrence of the injury/illness after a quiescence of 30 days that may require a reinstitution of care.
  • Care of chronic/recurrent conditions – Medically necessary care of recurrent/chronic conditions is care that is provided when the injury/illness is not expected to completely resolve after a treatment regimen but where continued care can reasonably be expected to result in documentable improvement for the patient. When functional status has remained stable under care and further improvement is not expected or withdrawal of care results in documentable deterioration, additional care may be necessary for the goals of supporting the patient’s highest achievable level of function, minimizing or controlling pain, stabilizing injured or weakened areas, improving activities of daily living, reducing reliance on medications, minimizing exacerbation frequency or duration, minimizing further disability, or keeping the patient employed and/or active. Chronic/recurrent care may be inappropriate when it interferes with other appropriate primary care or when its benefits are outweighed by its risks, for example, psychological dependence on the physician or treatment, illness behavior, or secondary gain.
  • Care for wellness – Achieving wellness requires active patient participation. Wellness is a process of achieving the best health possible, given one’s genetic makeup, by pursuing an optimal level of function. “Optimizing levels of function” may include a combination of health care strategies such as chiropractic adjustments, manipulative therapy, manual therapies, exercise, diet/nutrition counseling, and lifestyle coaching.

The formal consensus process followed the RAND/UCLA method for rating appropriateness. Panelists were selected to provide a broad representation of the profession in terms of geographic location and organizational affiliation, and an attempt was made to include members of other professions, including representation from third-party payers.

“We are working very hard to level the health care playing field and to fully integrate doctors of chiropractic and their professional services into America’s health care system at all levels. While the chiropractic profession serves tens of millions of patients and is the third largest doctoral-level health care profession in the United States, it is still not as fully integrated as it should be,” said ACA President Rick McMichael, DC. “Doctors of chiropractic will only be able to level the health care playing field when we speak a common language with one voice, as a united profession.”

“The days of isolationism are fading away. Chiropractic care is becoming integrated into the VA hospital system, as well as many other private sector and educational environments,” said CCGPP Chairman Ronald J. Farabaugh, DC. “The common language spoken in these environments is the language of ‘best practices,’ and it is a language in which DCs need to become fluent, as we become more fully integrated into mainstream health care.”

A full report on the consensus process, including a complete list of the established terms, was published in the July/August 2010 issue of the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics.

By |September 16, 2010|Guidelines|6 Comments

About the Author:

Dr Wiens created the very first chiropractic information page on the web in Nov 1994. In 1995 he joined as chief designer. He lives in Canada.


  1. karl September 16, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    I like many have mixed feelings about “integration”/expanding our scope of practice. This may be our reality. The chiropractic profession in my opinion, needs to somewhat reinvent itself/evolve or we way may be left behind.

    This profession has plenty of routine opposition from big pHarma to physical therapy. Although, we have survived there’s been plenty of collateral damage. Our scope of practice correctly or not, seems to be constantly challenged……..burning up resources and further weakening/fragmenting the profession. In the world of escalating health care costs/% of GDP, Affordable Health Care Act, the increased underinsured/uninsured and physical medicine competition we may need to make some compromises. Physical therapists are expanding their scope of practice to possibly dominate spinal manipulation. The chiropractic profession may have an opportunity to dominate the “wellness” and “prevention” parts of the Affordable Health Care Act. I believe we need to look at compromises for our survival. Big pHarma and medicine will always be the big players and they’re not going any where. Could chiropractic get further weakened if we don’t make compromises and integrate? I personally look beyond today and say I think we could be further weakened. I agree “the days of isolationism are fading away”.

  2. Roy Davis September 17, 2010 at 11:46 am

    This seems like a debate that many people have opinions on. Thanks for the information.

  3. I agree with Karl’s point “the days of isolationism are fading away”. Is it possible to integrate without giving up our uniqueness? At the end of the day the thing I care most about are my ability to provide a living for my family and the ability to provide the very best care to my patients.

    What are most important to you?

  4. Graeme Gibson October 3, 2010 at 3:40 am

    When I read things about “acceptance” of chiropractic care into mainstream medicine I get very concerned. Not about receiving valid acceptance, but ended up in a bastardized profession that is slowly getting absorbed. We don’t need to look too far back to see what happened with osteopaths, may of whom believe they evolved, when in fact they are nothing more than M.D.’s.

    I think back to a class taught by Bob Braille, D.C. at Life University. Say what you will about the man, but the last thing he is, pardon the pun, spineless.

    He spoke of war. He spoke of the first thing an occupying force would do to destroy a country or culture. It would target the lexicon, or language. It would ban the native tongue in favor of what was deemed acceptable.

    Over time some might call this a countries evolution and grow to love it. I would call it the destruction of a nation.

    It’s too bad our ACA leaders didn’t take the same class I did, they might actually begin to understand what is at stake.

    Graeme Gibson, D.C.
    Queen Anne Chiropractic Center
    1905 Queen Anne Avenue North
    Seattle, WA 98109
    (206) 282-8275

  5. seattle chiropractor November 9, 2010 at 9:15 pm

    Chiropractic care is essential to the combat readiness of our military. The defense of our nation and our interests abroad depend on the physical and mental health of our soldiers. I currently have soldiers, inlcuding Special Forces/Rangers, under my care, who came to me after having followed the typical medical protocol and not attained results, yet their cases are resolvable with routine chiropractic care. Giving up some of our uniqueness is a fair price to pay so that those of us who wish to serve our country in the military can do so as doctors of chiropractic, and as commissioned officers and soldiers who desperately need chiropractic care can get the quality care they deserve.

  6. Dr. Holly Clemens October 24, 2016 at 6:36 pm

    It’s refreshing that chiropractic care is becoming more integrated with mainstream healthcare. More people need to experience the advantages that chiropractic offers, and if integration with mainstream medicine is required to make that happen, then I’m all for it!

Leave A Comment