Chiro.org - Chiropractic Resource Organization.     Support Chiropractic Research!

A Prospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Return-to-Work Coordinators in Getting Injured Workers Back on the Job

Home/Return To Work/A Prospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Return-to-Work Coordinators in Getting Injured Workers Back on the Job

A Prospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Return-to-Work Coordinators in Getting Injured Workers Back on the Job

The Chiro.Org Blog


SOURCE:   J Occup Rehabil. 2018 (Jun); 28 (2): 298–306

Tyler J. Lane, Rebbecca Lilley, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson, Anthony D. LaMontagne, Malcolm R. Sim, Peter M. Smith

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine,
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine,
Monash University, Level 2,
553 St Kilda Road,
Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.


Purpose   To assess the impact of workplace-based return-to-work (RTW) Coordinators’ interpersonal and functional activities on RTW outcomes.

Methods   Multivariable logistic regression analyses of cross-sectional and longitudinal survey responses of 632 injured workers with at least 10 days of work absence in Victoria, Australia, adjusting for demographic and other workplace factors. Outcome was being back at work for at least 1 month, measured at both baseline and 6 month follow-up survey. Participant responses to stressfulness of Coordinator interactions were dichotomised into good and poor and evaluated as a proxy for Coordinators’ interpersonal activities, while having a RTW plan was evaluated as a proxy for functional activities.

Results   At baseline, RTW plans doubled the odds of RTW (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.40-2.90) and attenuated the impact of good Coordinator interactions (1.14; 0.77-1.70). At 6-month follow-up, the opposite was observed: good interactions nearly doubled odds of RTW (1.90; 1.22-2.95) while RTW plans were non-significant (1.02; 0.68-1.54).

There are more articles like this @ our:

The RETURN TO WORK Section

Conclusions   Differences between when the two Coordinator activities were effective may be due to the nature of claimants who RTW in each survey period. Length of shorter-duration claims are influenced by injury related factors, while psychosocial factors tend to be more important for longer-duration claims. Such factors may determine whether a claimant is more likely to respond to Coordinators’ functional or interpersonal activities. The findings have important implications for increasing Coordinator effectiveness.

KEYWORDS:   Occupational health; Return to work; Return to work coordinators; Workers’ compensation


From the FULL TEXT Article:

Introduction

In 2010, an estimated 313 million people worldwide experienced an occupational injury or disease requiring at least 4 days off work, with a total estimated cost of 4% of global GDP. [1] Time off work due to injury is associated with poorer physical, mental, and social health outcomes, while good quality work — even for those who are ill or recovering — promotes recovery, improves health, and reduces the negative effects of long-term work absence. [2-5] We investigated whether workplace-based return-to-work (RTW) Coordinators can reduce the burden of occupational injury by improving the likelihood of RTW among injured workers.

Throughout North America, Europe, and Australasia, Coordinators manage injured workers’ transition back to the job [6, 7] and are regarded as an important component of successful RTW interventions. [8-10] Known by various titles including rehabilitation coordinator, injury management coordinator, and case manager [11, 12], their common feature is management of the RTW process through workplace assessment, RTW planning, and fostering communication, negotiation, and conflict resolution between injured workers, employers, and other stakeholders. [7, 8, 11–14] Coordinators may be located in the workplace, a government agency, hospital or other healthcare organisation, or be an independent consultant. [6, 7] Interventions that include a Coordinator have shorter disability durations, lower costs, and may improve functioning and quality of life. [8, 9, 15] A recent Cochrane review of 14 randomised controlled trials suggested that compared to usual practice, Coordinators do not improve RTW outcomes. [16] However, the studies in the review were rated at low- to moderate-quality and did not account for different Coordinator activities, which may be an important factor in their impact. For instance, recent research suggests that both management and interpersonal skills are essential for success in the Coordinator role [6, 11, 14, 17], but to our knowledge their impact on RTW outcomes has not been quantitatively assessed.


Read the rest of this Full Text article now!


About the Author:

I was introduced to Chiro.Org in early 1996, where my friend Joe Garolis helped me learn HTML, the "mark-up language" for websites. We have been fortunate that journals like JMPT have given us permission to reproduce some early important articles in Full-Text format. Maintaining the Org website has been, and remains, my favorite hobby.

Leave A Comment