THE GLOBAL SPINE CARE INITIATIVE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SPINE-RELATED COMPLAINTS IN POPULATIONS WITH LIMITED RESOURCES AND IN LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COMMUNITIES
 
   

The Global Spine Care Initiative: A Systematic Review for the
Assessment of Spine-related Complaints in Populations with
Limited Resources and in Low- and Middle-income Communities

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:
    Frankp@chiro.org
 
   

FROM:   European Spine Journal 2018 (Sep);   27 (Suppl 6):   816–827 ~ FULL TEXT

Margareta Nordin, Kristi Randhawa, Paola Torres, Hainan Yu, Scott Haldeman, O’Dane Brady, Pierre Côté, et al.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
New York University,
New York, NY, USA.
margareta.nordin@nyu.edu


PURPOSE:   The purpose of this systematic literature review was to develop recommendations for the assessment of spine-related complaints in medically underserved areas with limited resources.

METHODS:   We conducted a systematic review and best evidence synthesis of guidelines on the assessment of spine-related complaints. Independent reviewers critically appraised eligible guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-II criteria. Low risk of bias clinical practice guidelines was used to develop recommendations. In accordance with the mandate of the Global Spinal Care Initiative (GSCI), recommendations were selected that could be applied to medically underserved areas and low- and middle-income countries by considering the limited access and costs of diagnostic technologies.

RESULTS:   We screened 3069 citations; 20 guidelines were eligible for critical appraisal. We used 13 that had a low risk of bias that targeted neck and back pain.

CONCLUSIONS:   When assessing patients with spine-related complaints in medically underserved areas and low- and middle-income countries, we recommend that clinicians should: (1) take a clinical history to determine signs or symptoms suggesting serious pathology (red flags) and psychological factors (yellow flags); (2) perform a physical examination (musculoskeletal and neurological); (3) do not routinely obtain diagnostic imaging; (4) obtain diagnostic imaging and/or laboratory tests when serious pathologies are suspected, and/or presence of progressive neurologic deficits, and/or disabling persistent pain; (5) do not perform electromyography or nerve conduction studies for diagnosis of intervertebral disc disease with radiculopathy; and (6) do not perform discography for the assessment of spinal disorders. This information can be used to inform the GSCI care pathway and model of care. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

KEYWORDS:   Clinical decision-making; Diagnosis; Review literature as topic; Spine; Symptom assessment

Return to GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE

Since 5-15-2020

                       © 1995–2020 ~ The Chiropractic Resource Organization ~ All Rights Reserved