J Can Chiropr Assoc 2026 (Apr); 70 (1): 27-54
Appendix 6. Certainty of evidence for intervention --
Efficacy of SMT vs comparator for Low back pain
Outcomes No. of participants randomized (Studies) Results favor (SMT, null, comparator) Risk of Bias (low, acceptable, high) Certainty of the evidence Comments (Reasons for downgrade/ upgrade) Pain Intensity
Scale: VAS, 11-Point Scale, 21-Point box scale495(3 RCT) 3 favor null 2 low risk, 1 acceptable risk ⊕⊕○○
LowImprecision Back-Specific Disability Status
Scale: ODI, MRS377 (2 RCT) 1 favors SMT
1 favors null2 low risk ⊕⊕○○
LowImprecision Functional Status
Scale: SF-36 physical function subscale377(2 RCT) 2 favors null 2 low risk ⊕⊕○○
LowImprecision Quality of Life/ Activities of daily living No trials were identified that reported on this outcome. ⊕○○○
Very LowNo Relevant Studies Abbreviations:
RCT = randomized controlled trial;
SF = short form;
SMT = spinal manipulative therapy,
VAS = verbal/visual pain scale,
ODI = Oswestry Disability Index,
MRS = Modified Roland Scale