Table 2

Summary of study characteristics of the 22 included studies

Author and year of publicationStudy DesignSettingAge/
grade
Measurements (how did they ask?)Study SizeBaseline response rateFollow up response ratePrevalence/incidenceType of complaintsMain result (text)Bias
General population studies
 Abujam et al. 2014Cross-sectionalIndia School based6–17 yrsQuestionnaire filled in by children or parents if the child was less than 14 years2059?Lifetime prevalenceHeel/
Ankle pain or swelling
N (%)
72 (3.5%)
High
 Adams et al. 2013Cross-sectionalUS
Cohort - Kaiser Permanente Southern California
2–19 yrsICD-9 codes913,1781 yrs. prevalenceLower extremity
Injuries or pain
Upper extremity:
Injuries or pain
5.8%
5.1%
Low
 Auvinen et al. 2009Prospective cohortFinland
2-years
Birth Cohort
16–18 yrsSelf-reported questionnaire73447344/
9215 (80%)
2012/
2969
(68%)
6-month
prevalence
Shoulder pain
Elbow pain
Wrist pain
Knee pain
Ankle pain
Prevalence % (N) F: female, M: male
Age: 16 yrs. 18 yrs.
F: 52 (506) 63 (616)
M: 33 (253) 40 (307)
F: 2 (22) 4 (35)
M: 5 (37) 5 (37)
F: 16 (156) 23 (219)
M: 15 (114) 20 (150)
F: 18 (178) 21 (201)
M: 18 (141) 17 (129)
F: 16 (150) 19 (179)
M: 18 (142) 15 (116)
High
 Bishop et al. 2012Prospective cohortEngland
Cohort -Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
5–13 yrsQuestionnaire filled in by chief carer93809380/
13,988 (67%)
6502/
13,988
(46%)
Often
prevalence
Total replied, n(%)
arms, n(%)
leg(s), n(%)
Total replied, n(%)
arms, n(%)
leg(s), n(%)
Total replied, n(%)
arms, n(%)
leg(s), n(%)
Age 5* Age 6*
9380 (100.0) 8599 (100.0)
13 + 227 = 240 (2.6) 14 + 299 = 313 (3.6)
1142 + 227 = 1369 (14.6) 1204 + 299 = 1503 (17.5)
Age 7* Age 8*
8325 (100.0) 7872 (100.0)
10 + 333 = 343 (4.1) 13 + 475 = 488 (6.2)
1226 + 333 = 1559 (18.7) 1188 + 475 = 1663 (21.1)
Age 11* Age 13*6996 (100.0) 6502 (100,0)
22 + 635 = 657 (9.4) 33 + 730 = 763 (11.7)
1386 + 635 = 2021 (28.9) 1342 + 730 = 2072 (31.9)
High
 Diepenmaat et al. 2006Cross-sectionalHolland
School based questionnaire
12–16 yrsSelf-reported questionnaire34853485/
4898
(71%)
Monthly prevalence, pain lasting a day or longerArm painMale: 4.2%
Female: 3.6%
Low
 Ehrmann Feldman et al. 2002Prospective cohortCanada High school based7.-9. gradeSelf-reported questionnaire810810/
948 (85%)
502/
810
(62%)
6 months and 12 months IncidenceUpper limb
Arm
Shoulder
6 monthsb 12 monthsb
19.9% 13.3%
9% 7%
8% 5%
Low
 El-Metwally et al. 2006Cross-sectionalFinland
2-years
Birth Cohort
9–11 yrsSelf-reported questionnaire17561756/
1823 (96%)
Weekly prevalence, within the last 3 monthsPrevalence N(%)
Lower limb pain
Ankle-foot pain
Knee pain
Thigh pain
Leg pain
Hip pain
Traumatic Non-traumatic Both groups
105 (6.0) 216 (12.3) 321 (18.3)
32 (1.8) 154 (8.8) 186 (10.6)
37 (2.1) 181 (10.3) 218 (12.4)
15 (0.9) 166 (9.5) 181 (10.3)
30 (1.7) 89 (5.1) 119 (6.8)
13 (0.7) 47 (2.7) 60 (3.4)
Low
 Hoftun et al. 2011Cross-sectionalNorway
Health Study
13–18 yrsSelf-reported questionnaire73737373/
7913 (93%)
Weekly prevalence, within the last 3 monthsUpper extremity
Lower extremity
13–15 yrs. (n % 95% CI): 16–18 yrs. (n % 95% CI):
163 4.0 (3.4–4.6) 129 3.9 (3.3–4.6)
522 12.8 (11.8–13.8) 282 8.6 (7.6–9.6)
Low
 Hulsegge et al. 2011Cross-sectionalHolland
Cohort of pregnant women - Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy
11 yrsQuestionnaire answered by
parents and child
26382638/
3963 = (67%)
1-year prevalenceUpper extremity
Lower extremity
4,8% (Boys: 3.1%, girls: 6.3%)
10,9% (Boys: 10.4%, Girls: 11.2%)
Medium
J espersen et al. 2014ProspectiveDenmark
School based cohort -
Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study
6–12 yrsRepeated text messages and
ICD-10 diagnosis given by clinicians
125990% for sports
schools
71% for normal schools
Weekly mean incidence
Weekly mean prevalence
Upper extremity
Lower extremity
Upper extremity
Lower extremity
Injury: 0.2 (± 4.0)
Overuse injury: 0.04 (± 2.0)
Traumatic injury: 0.1 (± 3.5)
Injury: 1.0 (± 9.7)
Overuse injury: 0.7 (± 8.2)
Traumatic injury: 0.3 (± 5.2)
Injury: 0.5 (± 7.2)
Overuse injury: 0.2 (± 4.9)
Traumatic injury: 0.3 (± 5.8)
Injury: 4.1 (± 19.9)
Overuse injury: 3.2 (± 17.7)
Traumatic injury: 1.1 (± 10.4)
Low
 Jespersen et al. 2015ProspectiveDenmark
School based cohort -
Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study
6–12 yrsRepeated text messages and
ICD-10 diagnosis given by clinicians
125990% for sportsschools
71% for normal schools
Incidence RateShoulder/
Upper Arm
Elbow/under Arm
Hand/wrist
Finger
Hip/Groin
Thigh
Knee
Lower leg
Achilles
Heel
Ankle
Foot
Overuse Traumatic0.03 (0.02–0.05) 0.03 (0.02–0.04)
0.01 (0.00–0.02) 0.02 (0.01–0.03)0.01 (0.00–0.01) 0.08 (0.06–0.10)0.00 (0.00–0.01) 0.05 (0.03–0.07)0.05 (0.04–0.07) 0.01 (0.00–0.01)0.04 (0.03–0.06) 0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.31 (0.27–0.35) 0.09 (0.07–0.11)0.05 (0.03–0.06) 0.01 (0.00–0.02)
0.06 (0.04–0.08) 0.000.36 (0.31–0.4) 0.000.01 (0.00–0.01) 0.18 (0.15–0.21)0.09 (0.07–0.11) 0.07 (0.05–0.09)
Low
 Krul et al. 2009Cross-sectionalHolland -Second Dutch National Survey in generel practice2–17 yrsInterview aboutself-reported musculoskeletal symptoms. In children younger than 12 years interview was carried out with a parent.24592459/
2719 (90%)
2 weeks prevalenceUpper extremity
All ages
2–11 y
12–17 y
Lower extremity
All ages
2–11 y
12–17 y
Hip and knee
All ages
2–11 y
12–17 y
Ankle and foot
All ages
2–11 y
12–17 y
% (n)
1.2 (26)
0.4 (5)
2.7 (21)
6.9 (147)
4.1 (57)
12.4 (90)
3.5 (75)
1.8 (25)
6.5 (50)
3.4 (72)
2.4 (32)
5.5 (40)
Low
 Mikkelssona et al. 1997Cross-sectionalFinland -School based cohort3.-5. gradeSelf-reported questionnaire17561756/
2141
(82%)
1628/
1756
(92%)
Weekly prevalence Relative frequency (%) with 95% CIUpper extremity
Lower extremity
Boys: 7 (6–9)b
Girls: 5.5 (4–7)b
Boys: 19 (16–22)b
Girls: 18 (15–20)b
Low
 Molgaard et al. 2011Single-blind case control (case-cohort)Denmark
High School based
16–18 yrsSelf-reported questionnaire299227/
299 (76%)
Monthly-prevalenceNon-traumatic knee pain57/227 = (25%)Medium
 Rathleff et al. 2013Cross-sectionalDenmark –
Cohort -
Adolescent Pain in Aalborg 2011,
12–19 yrsSelf-reported questionnaire40072953/
4007 (73%)
Point prevalenceKnee
Shoulder
Foot
Shin
Hip/groin
Forearm/hand
Thigh
Elbow
Any frequency:
32.3 (30.6–34.0)
13.3 (12.1–14.5)
11.5 (10.4–12.7)
6.2 (5.4–7.1)
5.9 (5.0–6.7)
4.4 (3.7–5.1)
2.7 (2.2–3.2)
2.6 (2.1–3.2)
Low
 Shrier et al. 2001Prospective cohortCanada
High School based
12–18 yrsSelf-reported questionnaire810810/948 (85%)502/810 (62%)Incidence
6 months
12 months
(once a week the last 6 months)
Lower extremity
Foot/ankle
Knee
Leg
Hip
6 monthsb 12 monthsb
% %
21 16
14 8
13 11
11 6
7 4
Low
 Smedbraten et al. 1998Cross-sectionalNorway
School based
10–15 yrsSelf-reported questionnaire569569/661
(86%)
Prevalence
Usually pain
Shoulder
Elbow
Hand
Hip
Knee
Ankle
Foot
Boys (n = 282) Girls (n = 287)
% %
6 14
4 4
5 7
5 7
32 29
7 12
8 11
High
 Slowinska et al. 2015Cross-sectionalPoland
School based
6–7 yrsQuestionnaire filled in by parents15091509/
2748 (55%)
Prevalence
often
Knee
Hands
Often
11%
3%
High
 Verhagen et al. 2009Prospective cohortHolland
school based
(iplay study)
10–12 yrsInjuries during physical activity
monitored by teachers
996/
(996 + 95) (91%)
Incidence RateShoulder
Upper arm/elbow
Lower arm/wrist/hand
Upper leg/hip
Knee
Lower leg/ankle
Foot
0.03 × 0.48 = 0.01c
0.03 × 0.48 = 0.01c
0.22 × 0.48 = 0.11c
0.06 × 0.48 = 0.03c
0.11 × 0.48 = 0.05c
0.25 × 0.48 = 0.12c
0.15 × 0.48 = 0.07c
High
Clinical population studies
 Bot et al. 2005Cross-sectionalHolland Second Dutch National Servey of generel practice0–19 yrsICPC codes375,899(all ages)Incidence per 1000 person yearsL08 Shoulder complaint
L09 Arm complaint
L10 Elbow complaint
L11 wrist complaint
L12 Hand/finger complaint
L92 Shoulder syndrome
Age group (years)
Sex 0–9 (95% CI) 10–19 (95% CI)
M: 0.6 (0.3–0.9) M: 4.0 (3.2–4.9)
F: 0.7 (0.4–1.1) F: 4.8 (3.9–5.7)
M: 2.0 (1.4–2.6) M:2.3 (1.7–3.0)
F:2.3 (1.7–2.9) F: 2.8 (2.1–3.5)
M: 1.3 (0.9–1.8) M: 2.3 (1.7–3.0)
F: 1.7 (1.2–2.3) F: 1.9 (1.3–2.4)
M: 1.8 (1.3–2.4) M: 6.3 (5.3–7.4)
F: 2.1 (1.5–2.7) F: 7.9 (6.8–9.1)
M: 5.0 (4.1–5.9) M: 8.7 (7.5–9.8)
F: 3.9 (3.1–4.7) F: 9.1 (7.8–10.3)
M: 0.1 (0.0–0.3) M: 1.4 (0.9–1.9)
F: 0.0 ((0.0–0.1) F: 1.9 (1.3–2.4)
Low
 Henschke et al. 2014Cross-sectionalAustralia
national study in general practice –
Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health
5–17 yrsICPC-2 codes65,279 encountersManagement rate per 100 encounters (encs.)Lower Limb
Upper Limb
Lower Limb
Upper Limb
Lower Limb
Upper Limb
Age: 5–9
Boys Girls
Number 118121
Rate/100 encs. 1.72 1.85
(95% CI) (1.39–2.06) (1.51–2.19)
Number 89 90
Rate/100 encs. 1.30 1.38
(95% CI) (1.02–1.58) (1.09–1.66)
Age: 10–14
Boys Girls
Number 311254
Rate/100 encs 5.33 4.40
(95% CI) (4.72–5.95) (3.85–4.96)
Number 257188
Rate/100 encs 4.41 3.26
(95% CI) (3.85–4.97) (2.76–3.76)
Age: 15–17
Boys Girls
Number 169134
Rate/100 encs 4.55 2.26
(95% CI) (3.84–5.26) (1.87–2.65)
Number 169 82
Rate/100 encs. 4.55 1.38
(95% CI) (3.83–5.27) (1.08–1.69)
Low
 van der Waal et al. 2006Cross-sectionalHolland
Second Dutch National Servey of generel practice
0–19 yrsICPC codes375,899(all ages)Incidence per 1000 person yearsL13 Hip complaints
L14 Leg/thigh complaints
L15 Knee complaints
L16 Ankle complaints
L17 Foot/toe complaints
L77 sprain of ankle/ft
L78 sprain/strain of knees
Acute meniscus/ligament knee
L97 Chronic int knee derangement
Age group (years)
0–9 (95% CI) 10–19 (95% CI)
M: 4.0 (3.2–4.8) M: 2.1 (1.5–2.7)
F: 4.9 (3.9–5.8) F: 2.2 (1.6–2.8)
M: 4.1 (3.3–4.9) M: 5.1 (4.2–6.0)
F: 4.2 (3.4–5.1) F: 4.3 (3.4–5.1)
M: 3.6 (2.8–4.3) M: 17.0 (15.3–18.6)
F: 2.7 (2.1–3-4) F: 16.7 (15.0–18.3)
M: 2.4 (1.8–3.0) M: 5.3 (4.4–6.2)
F: 1.9 (1.3–2.5) F: 5.0 (4.1–5.9)
M: 9.2 (8.0–10.4) M: 16.2 (14.6–17.8)
F: 8.5 (7.2–9.7) F: 14.3 (12.7–15.8)
M: 3.6 (2.8–4.3) M: 15.4 (13.8–17.0)
F: 3.8 (3.0–4.6) F: 16.4 (14.7–18.0)
M: 0.9 (0.54–1.33) F: 6.0 (5.0–7.0)
F: 0.4 (0.1–0.7) F: 3.7 (2.9–4.5)
M: 0.1 (−0.03–0.2) F: 1.2 (0.8–1.7)
F: 0 F: 0.8 (0.5–1.2)
M: 0.4 (0.1–0.6) F: 4.3 (3.4–5.1)
F: 0.6 (0.3–0.9) F: 7.0 (5.9–8.1)
Low
ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases – 10

ICPC: International Classification of Primary Care

a Only baseline were reported

b percentages taken from Fig. Fig.11 in the original article

c percentage taken from Fig. Fig.11 in the original article times the total incidence rate per 1000 exposure hours (0.48)