Table 7

Risk of Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials Based on the ROB 1 Tool Criteria

StudySelection biasPerformance biasDetection biasAttrition biasReporting biasSelection biasOther biasOver all risk of bias
Method of randomizationTreatment allocation concealedPatient blinded to the interventionCare provider blinded to the interventionOutcome assessor blinded to the interventionDrop-out rateIntention to treat analysisFree from selective outcome reportingSimilarity of group baseline characteristicsCo-interventions avoided or comparableCompliance acceptable in all groupsTiming of outcome assessment similaroutcome measurement tools, conflicts of interest and funding
Ahlqwist et al. (2008) []LowLowUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLowHighUnclearUnclearLowLowHigh

Evans et al. (2018) []LowLowUnclearUnclearUnclear

12 weeks:

SMT + ET: 1/93 (1.1%)

ET: 4/92 (4.3%)

LowLowLowLowLowLowLowUnclear

Fanucci et al. (2009) []LowLowHighHighHigh

3 months:

Exercise: 0%; No treatment: 3%

UnclearLowUnclearUnclearLowLowLowHigh

Jones et al. (2007) [, ]UnclearLowHighHighHigh

Control: 13%

Exercise: 13%

HighLowUnclearUnclearLowLowUnclearHigh

Jung et al. (2020) []LowUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearLowUnclearHigh

Ng et al. (2015) []LowLowHighLowHigh

8 weeks:

Cognitive functional approach: 11.8%

Active control: 5.3%

12 weeks:

Cognitive functional approach: 11.8%

Active control: 5.3%

UnclearLowLowUnclearLowLowLowHigh

Selhorst et al. (2015) []LowUnclearUnclearLowUnclear

4 weeks (PSFS, NPRS):

Sham + Exercise: 35.2%

Manipulation + Exercise: 22.2%

6 months (chronic symptoms, recurrence of symptoms, additional treatment):

Sham + Exercise: 11.8%

Manipulation + Exercise: 5.6%

LowLowUnclearUnclearUnclearLowLowHigh

Vitman et al. (2022) []UnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearUnclearTotal drop-out: 7.4%. Unclear about the group allocation of the drop-outsHighLowUnclearUnclearUnclearLowLowHigh
External link. Please review our privacy policy.