Table 2.
Overall Effect | Intervention Group, Mean (95% CI) | Control Group, Mean (95% CI) | Between-Group Difference, Mean (95% CI)c | P Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Facet joint trial, No. of participants | 125 | 126 | ||
Overall | −0.08 (−0.50 to 0.34) | .71 | ||
3 wk | 5.17 (4.73 to 5.61) | 5.92 (5.58 to 6.26) | −0.41 (−1.02 to 0.19) | .18 |
6 wk | 5.19 (4.76 to 5.61) | 5.90 (5.53 to 6.26) | −0.38 (−0.96 to 0.20) | .20 |
3 mo | 5.01 (4.59 to 5.43) | 5.44 (5.03 to 5.85) | −0.18 (−0.76 to 0.40) | .55 |
6 mo | 4.61 (4.18 to 5.04) | 4.84 (4.38 to 5.30) | −0.04 (−0.63 to 0.56) | .91 |
9 mo | 4.66 (4.20 to 5.00) | 4.73 (4.24 to 5.22) | 0.19 (−0.41 to 0.80) | .53 |
12 mo | 4.49 (4.00 to 4.97) | 4.44 (3.94 to 4.94) | 0.47 (−0.14 to 1.07) | .13 |
Sacroiliac joint trial, No. of participants | 116 | 112 | ||
Overall | −0.40 (−0.83 to 0.03) | .07 | ||
3 wk | 4.96 (4.51 to 5.40) | 6.00 (5.59 to 6.41) | −0.96 (−1.63 to −0.29) | .005 |
6 wk | 5.22 (4.81 to 5.64) | 5.69 (5.31 to 6.08) | −0.53 (−1.17 to 0.10) | .10 |
3 mo | 4.77 (4.31 to 5.24) | 5.45 (4.94 to 5.95) | −0.71 (−1.35 to −0.06) | .03 |
6 mo | 4.50 (4.01 to 4.98) | 4.78 (4.24 to 5.31) | −0.12 (−0.77 to 0.53) | .73 |
9 mo | 5.03 (4.55 to 5.51) | 4.97 (4.39 to 5.56) | 0.16 (−0.51 to 0.83) | .64 |
12 mo | 4.65 (4.16 to 5.13) | 4.84 (4.30 to 5.38) | −0.07 (−0.74 to 0.60) | .83 |
Combination trial, No. of participants | 103 | 99 | ||
Overall | −0.21 (−0.76 to 0.35) | .47 | ||
3 wk | 5.45 (4.95 to 5.95) | 6.40 (5.91 to 6.89) | −0.65 (−1.47 to 0.17) | .12 |
6 wk | 5.37 (4.89 to 5.85) | 6.09 (5.65 to 6.52) | −0.40 (−1.14 to 0.34) | .29 |
3 mo | 4.77 (4.25 to 5.30) | 5.94 (5.42 to 6.45) | −0.99 (−1.73 to −0.25) | .01 |
6 mo | 4.92 (4.39 to 5.44) | 4.95 (4.35 to 5.54) | 0.33 (−0.53 to 1.09) | .39 |
9 mo | 5.01 (4.47 to 5.56) | 5.25 (4.65 to 5.86) | −0.05 (−0.82 to 0.73) | .90 |
12 mo | 4.85 (4.24 to 5.46) | 4.38 (3.73 to 5.03) | 0.69 (−0.10 to 1.49) | .09 |
bThe overall effect measures provide information over the total follow-up time of 12 mo, instead of the time × treatment effects.
cValues presented (for mean differences) are model estimates of linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept, and adjusted for outcome at baseline and age, sex, body mass index, education, smoking, marital status, back pain complaint history, and participant expectations. Regression coefficients can be interpreted as mean differences between interventions at a certain follow-up point compared with baseline.