Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;

Table 1.

Change in median ratings and extent of agreement and disagreement between the initial at-home ratings and final face-to-face meeting ratings by panelists using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method

ItemCervical MobilizationCervical Manipulation
No other
adequate
conservative
care
Nonmanipulative
conservative
care has failed
No other
adequate
conservative
care
Nonmanipulative
conservative care
has failed
Initial
Ratings
Final
Ratings
Initial
Ratings
Final
Ratings
Initial
Ratings
Final
Ratings
Initial
Ratings
Final
Ratings
For the clinical scenarios that did not change between rounds (330 for each cervical mobilization and manipulation)
   Average Median4.74.45.24.43.93.94.24.2
   MAD from Median1.51.21.41.21.51.21.61.2
   Number (%) Agreement22 (13.3%)61 (37.0%)44 (26.7%)72 (43.6%)38 (23.0%)55 (33.3%)44 (26.7%)64 (38.8%)
   Number (%) Uncertain138 (83.6%)102 (61.8%)117 (70.9%)89 (53.9%)122 (73.9%)109 (66.1%)115 (69.7%)100 (60.6%)
   Number (%) Disagreement5 (3.0%)2 (1.2%)4 (2.4%)4 (2.4%)5 (3.0%)1 (0.6%)6 (3.6%)1 (0.6%)
For all clinical scenarios used in the final round (372 for each cervical mobilization and manipulation)
   Average Median4.34.73.94.2
   MAD from Median1.21.21.31.2
   Number (%) Agreement70 (37.6%)82 (44.1%)63 (33.9%)75 (40.3%)
   Number (%) Uncertain114 (61.3%)100 (53.8%)122 (65.6%)110 (59.1%)
   Number (%) Disagreement2 (1.1%)4 (2.2%)1 (0.5%)1 (0.5%)

MAD = mean absolute deviation