Table 1.
Change in median ratings and extent of agreement and disagreement between the initial at-home ratings and final face-to-face meeting ratings by panelists using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
Item Cervical Mobilization Cervical Manipulation No other
adequate
conservative
careNonmanipulative
conservative
care has failedNo other
adequate
conservative
careNonmanipulative
conservative care
has failedInitial
RatingsFinal
RatingsInitial
RatingsFinal
RatingsInitial
RatingsFinal
RatingsInitial
RatingsFinal
RatingsFor the clinical scenarios that did not change between rounds (330 for each cervical mobilization and manipulation) Average Median 4.7 4.4 5.2 4.4 3.9 3.9 4.2 4.2 MAD from Median 1.5 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.2 Number (%) Agreement 22 (13.3%) 61 (37.0%) 44 (26.7%) 72 (43.6%) 38 (23.0%) 55 (33.3%) 44 (26.7%) 64 (38.8%) Number (%) Uncertain 138 (83.6%) 102 (61.8%) 117 (70.9%) 89 (53.9%) 122 (73.9%) 109 (66.1%) 115 (69.7%) 100 (60.6%) Number (%) Disagreement 5 (3.0%) 2 (1.2%) 4 (2.4%) 4 (2.4%) 5 (3.0%) 1 (0.6%) 6 (3.6%) 1 (0.6%) For all clinical scenarios used in the final round (372 for each cervical mobilization and manipulation) Average Median 4.3 4.7 3.9 4.2 MAD from Median 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 Number (%) Agreement 70 (37.6%) 82 (44.1%) 63 (33.9%) 75 (40.3%) Number (%) Uncertain 114 (61.3%) 100 (53.8%) 122 (65.6%) 110 (59.1%) Number (%) Disagreement 2 (1.1%) 4 (2.2%) 1 (0.5%) 1 (0.5%) MAD = mean absolute deviation