This material is intended to serve: (1) postgraduate
educational departments
as the minimal criteria necessary for annual ACRBz course
re-certification; (2)
as a guide for instructors in course preparation and test
question
submitionsubmission to the ACRB; and (3) as study guide and
reference resource
for the candidate preparing for national examination.
This material builds upon the academic material and clinical
skills from year
I.
B) ASSESSMENT
3) Advanced assessement of motor
control
Instability is defined as a poor
control of movement
around a jointrquote s center of rotation (1,12). This
may include the
concept thatconcept that the center of force should be over a
stable platform.
Another factor in this definition is the speed of contraction of
muscles required
to achieve this stability. When a movement arc occurs with a
broad or erratic
center of rotation around a joint, or the center of mass cannot
be maintained
over a stable base of support injuries are more
likely.(1-3) To
accomplish this proximal stability is needed. For instance, if
the scapulae
moves superiorly in the early part of an arm raising activity
(the "setting
phase") this has been correlated with shoulder pain
syndromes.
(54) Similarly, when a forward head posture is
present a greater
incidence of headache can be predicted.(6,75,6)
Lower back pain
patients are distinguishable from non-sufferers by having poor
control of A to
P body sway on a balance board as well as by having an erratic
sagital movement
path after prolonged resisted trunk flexion/extension
movements.(2,3)
Lower back pain patients have also been shown to have poor
control of their
center of force when going from 2 leg standing to 1 leg standing
(3).
Knee stability has been shown to be improved by proprio-sensory
training
whichtraining that increases the reaction speed of the hamstrings
(7).
It has also been shown that a slow reaction speed of the peronei
is correlated
with ankle instability (8). Slow speed of activation
of the transverse
abdominis during arm movements distinguishes LBP from non-LBP
patients.
(11)
Most low back injuries are due to end-range loading. Discs
from repeated
flexion, facets from repeated extension (9). For this
reason exercises
involving co-contraction of antagonistof antagonist muscles are
recommended for
training joint stability (9,10). Increased joint
stiffness has been
demonstrated in the knee as a result of agonist/antagonist
co-contraction
(10).
References:
11) Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine.
Part 1. Function,
dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disorders
1992; 5:383-
389.
2) Paarnianpour M, Nordin M, Kahanovitz N, Frank V. The
triaxial coupling
of torque generation of trunk muscles during isometricduring
isometric
exertions and the effect of fatiguing isoinertial movements
on the motor
output and movement patterns. Spine 1988;13:982-992.
3)) Byl NN, Sinnot PL. Variations in balance and body sway
in middle-aged
adults: subjects with healthy backs omparedcompared with
subjects
with low-back dysfunction. Spine 1991:16:325-330.
4) Ihara H, Nakayama A. Dynamic joint control training for
knee ligament
injuries. Am J Sports Med 14(4);309-315, 1986.
5) Babyar SR. Phys Ther 1996;76:226-238..
6) Watson, DH, Trott PH. Cephalgia 1993:13;272-284.
7) Treleaven J, Jull G. Cephalgia 1994:14;273-279.
8) Konradsen L, Ravn JB. Ankle instability caused by
prolonged peroneal
reaction time. Acta Orthopaedica Scan 1990;61:388--390.
8)1990;61:388--390.(???)
9) McGill SM. Low back exercises: prescription for the
healthy back
and when recovering from injury. ACSM Resource Manual - 3rd ed.
Williams
& Wilkins, Baltimore (sched 1997).
10) Gollhafer A, Kryolainen H. Neuromuscular control of
the human leg
extensor muscles in jump exercises under various stretch load
condition.
International Journal of Sports Medicine 1991;12:34-40.
11) Hodges P, Richardson C. Spine 1996, Vol 21:2640-2650
12) Bogduk N Amevo B, Pearcy, M. Proceedings Instn Mech
Engrs. 1995 Vol
209 pp177-183.
4) Upper quarter screen
Understanding what comprises the upper
quarter is
imperative to a well organized and complete evaluation. The upper
quarter
includes the cervicothoracic, scapulothoracic, costotransverse,
glenohumeral,
acromioclavicular and stemoclavicular articulations, the
associated soft
tissue structures as well as the distal aspect of the upper
extremity. The entire
shoulder complex is the critical link to complete functional
success of
rehabilitation of the upper extremity and cervicothoracic spine.
Most activities
of daily living can still be performrned despite the loss of
glenohumeral motion,
providing that mobility in the cervical spine and distal upper
extremity joints
are not impaired.
The evaluation of this region must include an orthopedic and
neurological
assessment. Postural analysis of the spine and shoulder girdle,
motion augmented
palpation of each articulation within the shoulder girdle
complex, upper quarter
movement patterns (shoulder abduction, cervical flexion, trunk
lowering and push-
up. and trunk flexion) and observation of muscular tone and
symmetry are all
necessary components of the upper quarter screen. A Systems
review must also be
incorporated to establish if a viscerosomatic referral pattern
exists.
- References:
- Sweeney T, Prentice C, Saal JA, Saal JS - Cervicothoracic
Muscular
Stabilization Techniques. Physical Medicine
- and Rehabilitation 4:2 June 1990
- Wilk K, Arrigo C An Integrated Approach to Upper
Extremity Exercises.
Orthop Phys Ther Clin North Am 1:2,
- 1992
- Liebenson C - Rehabilitation of the Spine: A Practitioner's
Manual. Williams
and Wilkens, 1995
- Lewitt K - Chain Reactions in Disturbed Function of the Motor
System. Man Med
1987, 3:27-29
5) Evaluation of gait
The lower extremity kinetic chain
functions
dynamically during gait. The foot is required to be both a mobile
adapter during
stance phase and a rigid lever during propulsion. The
requirements of the
subtalar region during these 2 distinct phases are mirrored in
the entire kinetic
chain.
For instance, in near terminal stance, in order to be able to
propel the body
forward, the following biomechanical events occur & their
function should be
observed:
- forward flexion of the swing leg
- external rotation of the thigh and lower leg of the stance
leg
- supination of the forefoot
- 60 degrees plantar flexion of the 1st metatarsal joint
- contraction of the peronei
- 10 degrees of hip joint extension
- anterior pelvic tilting
The result of these events is a "high-gear" push
off. With
appropriate plantar flexion of the 1st MTP and early firing of
the peronei, the
slack is taken out of the plantar fascia enabling the force
transmission system
called the "windlass mechanism".
Unfortunately, gait is notoriously difficult to evaluate.
Pronation is the
easiest and mostand most popular item to observe during gait.
Excessive
pronation or failure of supination at terminal stance would be a
key assessment
feature.
Other easily observable factors to look for
during gait include
stride length, knee hyperextension, external rotation of the
stance limb,
symetrical spinal rotation & arm swing, and pelvic
mechanics.
References
1) Michaud T. Foot Orthoses. Williams & Wilkins,
Baltimore, 1993.
6) Return to Work Outcomes (related to Dictionary
of Occupational
Title items)
Realistic end-points of care
include:
- Pain Relief
- Elimination of Activity Intolerance/Limitation
- Return to Work
- Functional Restoration.
According to the AHCPR "The panelrquote s overall intent
was to change
the paradigm of focusing care exclusively on the pain of lowof
low back problems
to one of helping patients improve their activity
tolerance." (1)
"Back problems" were defined as activity intolerances
due to back-
related symptoms..." (1)
Activity Limitations are drawn from the Dictionary of
Occupational Titles
(2,3). These are core functional characteristics that
define the Demands
of Employment (2). Some examples are: lifting,
carrying, standing,
walking, kneeling, crouching, and balancing.
What tools are useful for identifying activity intolerances?
Identification
of patientspatientrquote s perception of their disability is one
of the simplest
methods. Various inexpensive tools can help capture this data:
Spinal
Function Sort;Hand Function Sort; Oswestry Low Back Pain
Index; Neck
Disability Index; Roland
Morris Scale;
and the Functional Assessment Screening Questionnaire.
References
1) Stanley J. Bigos, MD, Rev. O. Richard Bowyer, G. Richard Braen, MD, et al.
Acute Lower Back Problems in Adults. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 14.
Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, [AHCPR Publication No. 95-0642].
Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1994
2) U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training
Administration:
Dictionary of Occupational Titles, (4th Edition): Supplement.
Washington,
D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986.
3) Fishbain DA, Khalil TM, Abdel-Moty A, et al. Physician
limitation when
assessing work capacity: a review. J Back Musculoskelet
Rehabil 1995;5:107-
113.
7) Quantifiable functional testing and disability
questionairesquestionnaires as they relate to activity
intolerance (to include
the role and appropriate timing of impairment rating).
According to AHCPR, "The panel
suggested that the
early goal of exercise programs is to prevent debilitation due to
inactivity and
then to improve activity tolerance to return patients to their
highest level of
functioning as soon as possible." (p 57) (1)
According to Hazard, there are 3 goals of care
(2):
1) Reduction of Pain
2) Treatment of Impairment
3) Prevention of Disability.
According to Gatchel, "Function drives the treatment
process." (3) According to Matheson,
"Once
healing has run itrquote s course, functional goal setting must
become the
primary goal of the secondary treatment program."
(4)
Questionnaires can be used to reliably and
responsively
measure disability or impairment. Examples include :
Spinal Function
Sort;Hand Function Sort; Oswestry Low Back Pain Index; Neck
Disability Index;
Roland Morris Scale; and the Functional Assessment Screening
Questionnaire.
Functional capacity evaluations are also valuable in
impairment assessment
(5-11). Criteria include safety, responsiveness,
reliability,
normative data, cost effectiveness, time efficiency, and validity
(7,8,10). Time efficient testing can take as little as
30 minutes
(10,11). The vValidity is stronger, however, in longer
evaluations
taking 4 hours or even 2 days (5,6).
Physical capacity testing of specific muscles and joints is
done to determine
impairments which can then be:
1. Addressed in a prescriptive manner (treatment
plan/rehabilitation
prescription) and,
2.To address the issue of outcomesoutcome assessment as
gathering objective
data which carries reliability, validity and normative data can
be used to
compare the initial baseline results to those gathered at
follow-up.
Hence, both assessment information as well as treatment
protocols can be
driven from the use of physical performance testing.
A number of low tech, reliable procedures have
emerged.12 They
have noramtivenormative data bases and good validity. Endurance
can be assessed
by the use of the repetitive squat, repetitverepetitive sit-up,
repetitive arch-
up and the static back endurance or, Sorenson's test12
. Muscle length
assessments are assessed by the Gastroenernius/Soleus, SLR,
Modified Thomas
(iliopsoas), knee flexion, and hip rotation tests.132
Spinal ROM is
gathered by use of dual inclinometers.(14, 15) 3.4
Grip is assessed
by the use of a Jamar grip dyrasmometer.(16)
Isomachines/testing can
add strength & endurance measurmentsmeasurements to this
evaluation for a
variety of regions. Excellent reliabityreliability, normative
data, and safety
have been established. Cost effectiveness is an issue in the
typical practice
setting.
References
1. Alaranta H, Hurri H, Heliovaara
M, et al.
Non~ynnnometric trunk performance tests: Reliability and
normative data. Scand
J ReImb Med 1994; 26:211-215.
2.Ekstrand J, Wiktorsson M, Oberg B, Giliquist J. Lower
extremity goniometric
measurements: A study to determine their reliability. Arch Phys
Med Rehab 1982;
63:171-175.
3.Gatchel 'U, Mayer TG, Capra P, et al. Quantification of
lumbar fimction,
Part 6: The use of psychological measures in guiding physical
flinctional
restoration. Spine 1986; 11:3641.
4.Mayer T, Gatchel 'U, Keeley 3, Mayer H, Richling D. A Male
incumbent worker
industrial database. Spine 1994; 19:762-76
5.Swanson AB, Matev ffi, de Groot Swanson G. The strength of
the hand. Bull
Prosthet Res Fall 1970;145-53.
1) Stanley J. Bigos, MD, Rev. O. Richard Bowyer, G. Richard Braen, MD, et al.
Acute Lower Back Problems in Adults. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 14.
Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, [AHCPR Publication No. 95-0642].
Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1994
2) Hazard R. Occupational low back pain, The critical role
of functional
goal setting. APS Journal 1994;3(2):101-106.
3) Gaetchel RJ. Occupational low back pain disability, Why
function need
to "drive" the rehabilitation process. APS Journal
1 994;3(2):107-
110.
4) Matheson L. Functional goal setting. APS Journal
1994;3(2):1111-
114.
5) Mooney V, Matheson LN. Objective measurement of soft
tissue injury:
FeasabilityFeasibility study examiner's manual. Industrial
Medical Council,
State of California 1994.
6) Fishbain DA, Khalil TM, Abdel-Moty A, et al. Physician
limitation when
assessing work capacity: a review. J Back Musculoskelet
Rehabil 1995;5:107-
113.
7) Hart DL, Isernhagen SJ, Matheson LN. Guidelines for
functional capacity
evaluation of people with medical conditions. J Orthop Sports
Phys Ther
18:682, 1993.
8) Matheson L. Basic requirements for utility in the
assessment of
physical disability. American Pain Society Journal 3:195,
1994.
9) Vernon H. Pain and disability
questionairesquestionnaires in
chiropractic rehabilitation In Liebenson C Rehabilitation of the
spine. Williams
and Wilkins, Baltimore 1996.
10) Yeomans SG,
Liebenson C.
Quantitative functional capacity evaluation. Top Clin Chiro
1996;3(1):32-43.
11) Yeomans SG, Liebenson C. Quantitative functional
capacity evaluation
and chiropractic case management. Top Clin Chiro
1996;3(3):15-25.
12. Alaranta H, Hurri H, Heliovaara M, et al. Nonsynnnometric
trunk
performance tests: Reliability and normative data. Scand J ReImb
Med 1994;
26:211-215.
13.Ekstrand J, Wiktorsson M, Oberg B, Giliquist J. Lower
extremity goniometric
measurements: A study to determine their reliability. Arch
Phys Med Rehab
1982; 63:171-175.
14.Gatchel 'U, Mayer TG, Capra P, et al. Quantification of
lumbar fimction,
Part 6: The use of psychological measures in guiding physical
functional
restoration. Spine 1986; 11:3641.
15.Mayer T, Gatchel 'U, Keeley 3, Mayer H, Richling D. A
Male incumbent
worker industrial database. Spine 1994; 19:762-76
16.Swanson AB, Matev ffi, de Groot Swanson G. The strength
of the hand.
Bull Prosthet Res Fall 1970;145-53.
8) Emerging classification systems of spinal
disorders
Diagnostic triage is the goal of
patient
classification (1). The 3 main categories of spinal
disorders are red
flags, nerve root pain, and mechanical pain. Thorough history
& examination
has excellent sensitivity & specificity for identifying the
various red flags
of serious disease (1,2). These include:
tumor, infection, fracture, inflammatory disease, caudacaudal
equina syndrome,
and serious neurological disease. Lab tests, imaging, &
referral follow
critical pathways related to each potential serious cause of
spinal pain.
Nerve root disorders can also be diagnosed through history
& examination
which have excellent sensitivity & specificity. Imaging is
only required if
there is a progression in the neurological loss or a lack of
progress over 4-6
weeks.
Nerve Root Compression
- Leg symptoms below the knee
- + nerve root tension signs (+ SLR or M,S, R exam)
- high sensitivity/specificity
- Imaging tests are unnecessary in 1st month
Non-Specific "Mechanical"
Pain
- 85is there supposed to be % here?% of all cases
- Better or worse w/ certain postures or movements
- poor sensitivity/specificity of orthopedic tests
- Usually in lumbar, buttock or thigh
Mechanical back pain is considered non-specific and except
with the use of
double anaesthetic block techniques and discography, has not been
able to be
objectively demonstrated with regard to specificdifferentially
diagnosed into
myofascial, facet, primary disc, or SI pain generatorscategories.
This is
changing, at least with regard to the disc as a pain generator,
with further
research into McKenzie methods of assessment of response to
loading and other
non-invasive methods (3,4) Similar procedures are
required in the
cervical spine.
13-30% of chronic LBP pts had relief
of pain from
diagnostic blocks of their SI joints (4). Groin pain
was suggestive
of SI involvement. Tears of the ventral capsule of the SI joint
were
significantly correlated with pain relief on injection.
40-68% of chronic neck pain pts post whiplash got relief from
posterior neck
joint injections (5). A double block was used to
reduce false + rate.
Pts had to have longer term relief with long acting block than w/
short acting
block.
Erhard & Delitto have shown that pts could
be reliably
classified as having SI dysfunction and/or a McKenzie extension
"bias"
(6). Matched, controlled treatment led to superior
results than
unmatched treatment thus demonstrating that generic treatment to
patients
classified as "non-specific" was inferior to treatment
aimed at more
specific classification of patients.
Just because no structural cause can be found in the vast
majority of
patients, the common assumption that there must be a psychogenic
etiology is
unjustified. Dworkin, states,"Pain report often occurs in the
absence of
pathophysiology or any discernible peripheral somatic changes.
This finding
implies the need to reexamine our limited understanding of pain,
rather than
leaping to the conclusion that such pains must be psychogenic."
(7).
References
1) Waddell G, Feder G, McIntosh A,
Lewis M, Hutchinson
A. (1996) Low back pain evidence review. London: Royal College of
General
Practitioners.
2) AHCPR
3) Donelson R, Aprill C, Medcalf R, Grant W. A prospective
study of
centralization of lumbar and referred pain: a predictor of
symptomatic discs
and anularannular competence. Spine 1997;
22(10):1115-1122.
4) Yrjama M, Tervonen O, Vanharanta H . Ultrasonic imaging of
lumbar discs
combined with vibration pain provocation comparerdcompared with
discography
in the diagnosis of internal anularannular fissures in the lumbar
spine. Spine.
1996; 21(5):571-575.
53) Bogduk N. Conference proceedings of the chiropractic
centennial
foundation, 1995).
64)Schwarzer AC, April CN, Bogduk N. The sacroiliac joint
in chronic low
back pain. Spine 1995:20;31-37
75) Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N. The
prevalence of chronic
cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash.
Spine1995:20;20-
26.
86) Erhard RE, Delitto A. Relative effectiveness of an
extension program and
a combined program of manipulation and flexion and extension
exercises in
patients with acute low back syndrome. Phys Ther 1994;
74:1093-1100.
97) Dworkin, APS 1992
9) Introduction to Functional Capacity testing of
whole body
activities
Functional capacity refers to whol~e
body limitations
involving dictionary of occupational titles job descriptions like
lifting,
carrying, climbing, crouching, etc.. An example is lifting
capacity. This Iis
contrasted with physical capacity which involves isolated
limitations of
muscle or joint strength, endurance or flexibility. An example is
trunk extension
endurance.
A functional capacLity evaluation typically takes from 2 hours
to 2 days. It
is usually perfonied performed by O.T.'s or P.T.'s. however,
reliable and valid
liftinghfting and carrying capacity tests can be performed in
just 20 minutes
with a low-tech approach This is certainly within the
grasp of a
chiropractic rehabilitation specialist.
- References:
- Mayer TG, Polatin P, Smith B, Smith ~ Gatchel R, Ilerring
SA, Hall H et
al.
- Contemporary concepts in spine care; sp~~ine rehabilitation -
secondary and
tertiary nonoperative care. Spine 2O:18;2O6O-2O64~, 1995.
- Mooney V,~ Matheson LN. Objec liveObjective ent of soft
tissue injury:
FeasabilityFeasibility study examiners S manual. Industrial
Med~ical Council,
State of Californi~ia 1994.
- Yeomans SC, Liebenson C. Quantitativeh.tati~e functional
capacity evaluation:
The missing llinkuik to outconiesoutcomes asse~snientassessment.
Top Clin ~Chiro
1996; 3.32A3.
- Fishlibain DA, Khalil TM, Abdel-Moty A, et al.
Physician limitation
when assessing work capacity: a review. J Back Musculos~kelet
Rehabil 1995;5:107-
113.
10) Advanced issues in the objective measurement
of soft tissue
injury (Dictionary of Occupational Titles)
Outcomes management can be
acheivedachieved by
gathering both subjective information (questionnaires), as well
as objective data
(physical performance testing - see #7). The subjective tools
include the:
1.general health questionnaires (SF-36);'
2.pain assessment scale (VAS - visual analogue scale,
numerical pain scale);
2.3 a
3.condition specific questionnaires (Oswestry, 4.
~ neck
disability index,6 headache quesionnaire,
7
and others);
4.psychometric questionnaires (SCL-90-R, 8Beck's
Depression
Screen, 9y,
5.patient satisfaction questionnaires (Chiropractic
Satisfaction
~estionnairequestionnaire): (10)IG
6.disability prediction questionnaires (Vermont Q)., ~
Sorenson's test,
12~'3~~OSH tests, LA)(11)
The objective tools include the functional performance tests
describe above
(see #7). In addition, a soft tissue tenderness grading scheme
has been described
which can "objectify" palpation which is very
useful.(12)
References
I.Goertz CMH. Measuring functional health status in the
chiropractic
office using self-report
questionnaires. Top Clia Chiro 1994; 1(1):
51-59.
2.Von Kortfm, Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Barlow SF. Back pain in
priinaryprimary
care: Outcomes at 1
yyear. Spine 1993; 18:855-862.
3.Dworkliin SF, Von KorlffM, Whitney WC, et al. Measurement of
characteristic
pain intensity
in field research. Pain Suppl 1990; 5:8290.
4.Oswestry LBPDQ: Fai~ik 3, Davies 3, et al. The Gswestry Low
Back Pain
Disability
Questionnaire. Physiother 1980; 66(18): 271-273.
5.Hudson~ook N, Tomes-Nicholson K. The revised Oswestry low
back pain
disability
questionnaire. Thesis; Angl~oEuropean College of
Chiropractic,
1988.
6.Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: A Study of
Reliability and
Validity. J Manip
Phys Ther 1991;14(7):409.
7. .3Jacobson Gary P., Ramadan NM, et al., The Henry Ford
Hospital
headache disability inventory
(HDI). Neurology l994;44:837~2.
8.Bernstein 'H, Jareinko ME, Hirkley BS. On the utility of
the SCL-90-R
with low-back pain
patients. Spine I 994;J 9:4248.
9.Beck A. Depression: Clinical, experimental and
theoretical aspects. New
York: Haper &
Row, 1967.
10.Coulter D, Hays RD, Danielson CD. The chiropractic
satisfaction
questionnaire. Top Clin
Chiro 1994; l(4):4043.
11.Vermont Q. (Short form): Hazard RG, Haugh LD, Reid S,
Preble JB,
MacDonald L. Farly
prediction of chronic disability after occupational low
back injury.
Spine 1996; 21:945-951.
12.Biering-Sorensen F: Physical measurements as risk
indicators for low-
back trouble over a one-
year period. Spine 19849:106-119.
13.Luoto S, Heliovaara M, Hurri H, Alaranta H. Static back
endurance and the
risk of low-back
pain. Clin. Biomech. 1995; 10(6):323-324.
14.Moffroid MT, Haugh LD. Henry SM, Short B. Distinguishable
groups
ofmusculoskeletal low
back pain patients and asymptomatic control subjects based
on physical
measures of the NIOSH
low back atlas. Spine 19:12;1350-135S, 1994.
152.Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. The American College
of Rheumatology
1990
criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia.
Arthritis Rheum. 1990;
33:160-172.
11) McKenzie Assessment of Lumbar Spine
McKenzie assessment of the lumbar
spine is based upon
the history and clinical testing of provocative and palliative
responses to
spinal loading during lumbar motion and at end range. The
assessment determines
whether spinal complaints are amenable to mechanical therapy.
Those amenable to
mechanical therapy are classified as one of three syndromes:
Postural,
Dysfunction, or Derangement. This classification is based upon
subjective and
objective findings that occur during motion and end-range
loading.
The behavior of spinal complaints amenable to mechanical
therapy arebehavior
of spinal complaints amenable to mechanical therapy is
distinguished from other
causes.
Complaints arising from the sacroiliac or hip joints which
mimimic complaints
of lumbar origin are a'ssessed according to the Cyriax paradigm.
Assessrnent of
"mobilization of the nervous system", per Butler, is
introduced. The
psychosocial impact of spinal assessment style is discussed.
Demonstration and
practical participation to develop patient assessment skills is
stressed.
- ReferencesS:
- Butler, D: Mobilization of the Nervous system.
Churchill Livingstone,
Melbourne, 1991
- Cyriax J, Cyriax P. Illustrated manual of orthopedic
medicine. London:
Butterworths, 1993
- Jacob G, McKenzie R "Spinal Therapeutics Based on
Responses to Loading,
in Rehabilitation of the Spine, Craig Liebenson, ed.,
Williams &
Wilkins, 1996
- M&cKenzie RA: The Lumbar Spine. MechjanicalMechanical
Diagnosis and
Therapy, Spinal Publications, Wailanae, New Zealand, 1995.
- McKenzie RA: Treat Your Own Back, Spinal Publications.
Waikanac, New Zealand,
1997
C) Rehabilitation Treatment
12) McKenzie Management of Low Back Pain
If spinal complaints are assessed as
being amenable
to mechanical therapy, they are classified as one of three
syndrome patterns,
each of which is managed according to an individual specific
exercise
(preferedpreferred loading strategy"):
1.Postural syndrome -- requires postural re-education
2. Dysfunction syndrome -- requires remodeling of adaptively
shortened
tissue
3.Derangernent syndrome -- requires reduction of deranged disc
material.
Recommendations for management of complaints not amenable to
mechanical
therapy isRecommendations for management of complaints not
amenable to mechanical
therapy are also conisideredconsidered. The employment of Cyriax
(for SI joint
and hip), Butler (for adherent nerve root), and strength
conditioning principles
to McKenzie management of low back is considered. The
psychosocial impact of
spinal treatment style is stressed. Includes demonustration and
practical
participation to develop treatment management skills.
- Referencess:
- Butler, D: Mobilization of the Nervous system.
Churchill
Livingstone, Melbourne, 1991
- Cyriax J, Cyriax P. Illustrated manual of orthopedic
medicine. London:
Butterworths, 1993
- Jacob G, McKenzie R "Spinal Therapeutics Based on
Responses to Loading,
in Rehabilitation of the Spine, Craig Liebenson, ed.,
Williams &
Wilkins, 1996
- M&cKenzie RA: The Lumbar Spine. MechjanicalMechanical
Diagnosis and
Therapy, Spinal Publications, Wailanae, New Zealand, 1995.
- McKenzie RA: Treat Your Own Back, Spinal Publications.
Waikanac, New Zealand,
1997
13) Open closed chain/functional movement
(upper & lower
extremity functional-whole body exercises
Open chain and closed chain exercises
have certain
characteristics that are necessary for the development of
strength motor skills:-
1.The behaviourbehavior of the distal segment.
2.The degrees oft freedom of the joints and number of axes
involved.
3.The types of muscular contractions that can be
acheivedachieved.
4.The movement may be isolated, complex, functional or
non-functional.
5.Facilitation of proprioceptive feedback and feedforward
mechanisms, hence
coordination can be enhanced.
6.Core, proximal and distal joint stability can be utilized to
improve
function.
7.Different muscle groups or isolated muscles of a complex
muscular chain may
be exercised.
8.Both gross and fine motor skills can be trained.
COMPARISONS:-
OPEN CHAIN CLOSE
CHAIN
End segment
Free Fixed
Axis of motion distal to joint proximal
and distal
Muscle action concentric concentric
eccentric,
isometric
Movement isolated Integrated
Load artificial physiological
Velocity Variable Variable
Stabilization often artificial Synergist
cocontraction
Planes often limited often 3
dimensional
variability limited unlimited
Both types of exercise are essential for rehabilitation. The
rehabilitation
stage and the degree of tissue healing will determine the use and
combination
ratio of these two types of exercise.
References:
- EnokaNOKA, R.M. Neuromechanical basis of kinesiolgy.
Human Kinetics1
1988.
- GrayRAY, G. Chain Reaction, course manual. Wynn marketing,
1992.
- McConaillONAILL, M.A., BasmajianASMAJIAN, J.V Muscles and
movement: a
basis for human kinesiology. William and Wilkins, 1969.BalkeALKE. B.. The Fitness Handbook. Wellness Bookshelf,
1995.
14) Advanced issues in the principles & protocols of Strength
Training
(including weights stacks/free weights). [See also topic #16,
first hundred
hours]
In order to properly, and adequately
address the
principles of strength training one must consider the principles
of hypertrophy,
the importance of quality of movement and the biomechanical
indicators for safety
during performance of such programs. The concentric and
eccentric, antagonist and
agonist, and the force and lever arm relationships are in need of
adressing in
order to allow for safe and appropriate strength training
programs. Eccentric and
concentric relationships are for stability and protection of the
musculotendinous
unit and ultimately the joint, and has been documented to be
approximately
1.3:1(1 )(2) Antagonist to agonist relationships are
for the stability
of joint, allowing appropriate biomechanics through a pain free
range of motion,
deminishing postural plastic deformation and other viscous
changes, and has been
documented to be approximately 3:4 to 4:5.(2)(3)
Appropriate performance of a specific exercise is dependant
upon the posture
during the lift and proper set up between patient and
machine(weight stack and
free weights). Accepted limitations in reference to lever arm and
contact of body
part in question is that the faurther away from the joint being
exercised is the
contact point of resistance, the more joint stress is produced.
For example:
Contact pad placement for the exercise Knee Extension, at the
Tibial Tuberosity
will allow 60-90 degrees of movement without significant joint
stress, 30~0
degrees with placement at mid tibia, and 20-30 degrees with
placement at the
distal tibia.(2)
Exercise protocols for strength training indicate that
proprioceptive and
postural training be successfully completed or in the process,
prior to
performing the actual strength movements of the joints in
question.(5)
Once a strength program is initiated1 flexion and extension of
the joint must be
performed, pain free through 75 percent of normal range of motion
prior to
performing adduction, abduction, or lateral flexion. Again, these
movements must
attain 75 percent of pain free motion prior to graduating to
dynamic or
rotational movmentsmovements.(3) Each exercise must be
performed
specifically and in, as close to perfect posture as possible,
combining normal
gait and biomechanics into the joint movements. For example: Knee
extension
should be performed with dorsiflexion and slight inversion and
knee flexion
should be performed in planterflexion and slight
eversion.(2) This
will ensure that the synergistic as well as the major muscle
groups are targeted,
increasing stability allowing for accomodationaccommodation and
restoration of
proper funcitonalfunctional movement of the joint complex.
Endurance training at 25-40% of patients MVC should precede
strength training
at greater than 90% of the In order to properly, and adequately
address the
principles of strength training one must consider the principles
of hypertrophy,
the importance of quality of movement and the biomechanical
indicators for safety
during performance of such programs. The concentric and
eccentric, antagonist and
agonist, and the force and lever arm relationships are in need of
addressing in
order to allow for safe and appropriate strength training
programs. Eccentric and
concentric relationships are for stability and protection of the
musculotendinous
unit and ultimately the joint, and has been documented to be
approximately
1.3:1(1 )(2) Antagonist to agonist relationships are
for the stability
of joint, allowing appropriate biomechanics through a pain free
range of motion,
diminishing postural plastic deformation and other viscous
changes, and has been
documented to be approximately 3:4 to 4:5.(2)(3)
Appropriate performance of a specific exercise is dependent
upon the posture
during the lift and proper set up between patient and
machine(weight stack and
free weights). Accepted limitations in reference to lever arm and
contact of body
part in question is that the farther away from the joint being
exercised is the
contact point of resistance, the more joint stress is produced.
For example:
Contact pad placement for the exercise Knee Extension, at the
Tibial Tuberosity
will allow 60-90 degrees of movement without significant joint
stress, 30~0
degrees with placement at mid tibia, and 20-30 degrees with
placement at the
distal tibia.(2)
Exercise protocols for strength training indicate that
proprioceptive and
postural training be successfully completed or in the process,
prior to
performing the actual strength movements of the joints in
question.(5)
Once a strength program is initiated1 flexion and extension of
the joint must be
performed, pain free through 75 percent of normal range of motion
prior to
performing adduction, abduction, or lateral flexion. patients
MVC.(5) In order
to protect joints and avoid reinforcing muscle imbalances, proper
form must be
maintained during strength training to ensure agonist isolation
(4)
References
1) Biemborn D, Morrissey Mc.A review of the literature
related to trunk
muscle performance. Spine 1988;
13(6) 655~0
2) Mcconnal McConnal Seminars: Patellar Femoral Syndrome,
Santa Monica GA,
1992
3) Sa ha, AK: Mechanisms of shoulder movements and a plea for
the recognition
of "zero" position of the
glenohumeral joint. din Orthop 173: 3-10
4) JaYonda V. "Evaluation of Muscular Imbalance", 1996,
pp97-1 12
5) Jordan A et al: Cervicobrachio syndrome, neck
muscle function:
effects of rehabilitation, J Musculoskeletal Pain, 1: 283-8,
1993
6) Rutherford O. (Craig Liebensen to fill in reference at
Delphi mtg)
15) Advanced issues in the principles and
protocols in endurance
training. [See also topic #17 of first hundred hours.]
ln In order to properly, and
adequately address the
principles of endurance training one must consider the principles
of aerobic and
anaerobic training, the energy systems required to perform such
types of
exerciesexercise, and the importance of target heart rate and the
biomechanical
and physiological indicators for safety during performance of
such programs.
Endurance training utlizesutilizes the anaerobic energy
sources for its energy
source, and is dependant upon the amount of force applied, the
quickness and the
number of repetitions performed in a specific amount of time.
Building onerquote
s endurance depends on the sport specific or activity specific
principle.(1
)(2) This indicates that in order to increase ones
individual endurance,
one must train in the appropriate percentage of aerobic and
anaeorbicanaerobic
cycles, as related to the targeted outcome. Ultimately this
includes interval
training, Fart-leck training, Zero effect, PyrimidPyramid, and
many other lactic
acid stimulating and glycogen utilizing activities.(3)
Safety is increased by utilizing girth of the areas trained,
resting heart
rate, soreness and range of motion as a guide to increasing
participation or
advancement in the program.(4) For example. Should the
quadracepsquadriceps circumference be greater than 1 centimeter
larger than
originally measured prior to the last session, than no intense
strength or
endurance training will shall be allowed.
Endurance training at 25-40% of patients MVC
should precede
strength training at greater than 90% of the patients MVC.(5) In
order to
protect joints and avoid reinforcing muscle imbalances, proper
form must be
maintained during strength training to ensure agonist isolation
(6)
References
1)American college of Sports Medicine's Guidelines for
Exercising Testing
and Prescription Fifth Edition, Williams and Wilkins, 1995
2)Hornberg, J. Exercise Physiology Guidelines. Rehabilitation
Guidelines for chiropractic, chiropractic Rehabilitation Association, 1992, ppl 1-18
3) National Academy of Sports Medicine, Exercise
Guidelines. 1990
4)Johnson BL, Nelson JK, Practical Measures for evaluation
of Physical
Education, 1969
5) Jordan A et al: Cervicobrachio syndrome, neck
muscle function:
effects of rehabilitation, J Musculoskeletal Pain, 1: 283-8,
1993
6) Janda V. "Evaluation of Muscular Imbalance", 1996,
pp97-1 12
16) Advanced issues in the principles and
protocols of flexibility training (including active stretching). [See also
topic #18 & #29 of first hundred hours.]
In order to properly, and adequately
address the
principles of flexibility training one must consider the
principles of nerve and
muscle biology, the eftectseffects of stretch on the muscle, and
the importance
of functional and biomechanical quality during this type of
training, to inhance
enhance safety.
Basic neurological principles include Post Contraction
Inhibition where muscle
contraction is closely followed by proportional relaxation of the
same muscle,
and Reciprocal Inhibition where the contraction of a gien muscle
inhibits the
contraction of it's antagonist.(1) The indication for
therapeutic
muscle stretching are :decreased range of motion, pain from
contractile tissue,
reduced healing capacity and prevention of atrophy. (1)
Types of Stretching being utilized on a
regular basis in
practice are:
- Static Stretch(SS)
- Contract Relax(GR)
- Hold Relax(HR)
- Repeated Contractions(RC)
- Hold Relax Active Motion(HRA)
- Rythmic Stabilization(RS)
- Slow Reversal(SR)
- Quick Reversal(QR)
- Slow Reversal Hold Relax(SRHR)
- Agonist Contract Relax(ACR)
- Reciprocal lnhibitioninhibition(RI)
- Postisometric Relaxation(PR)
- Contract Relax Antagonist Contract(CRAC)
- Postfacilitation Stretch (PS)(2)
Contraindication for Therapeutic Muscle Stretch (TMS) include
lack of
stability, vascular compromise, inflammation or infection,
excessive pain and
lack of compliance from patient. (3)
There are many types of stretching techniques utilizing
the above basic
principles. Contract Relax(CR) Antagonist Contraction(AC) has
been found to be
the most appropriate for pain and inflammation reduction when
performed after
cryotherapy to the area. Range of motion benefit is best attained
by performing
cryotherapy followed by three static stretches followed by active
range of
motion.(4)(5)
Active, or active resistive exercises in the appropriate
posture(see #14)
can aid in the painfree attainment of stretch in a tight or
hypertonic
muscle. Flexibility and appropriate muscle length relationships
are essential to
joint stability and proprioception, thus aiding in muscle
strength balance.
Muscle relaxation is a prerequsite for improving the resting
length of
contractile tissues. Stretch is often unnecessary if relaxation
spontaneously
achieves a release and lengthening response in the tissue.
Stretch may actually
shorten muscles by facilitating contraction via the stretch
reflex. (6)
References
(1)Etnyre BR, Abraham LD: H Reflex changes during static
stretching and
two variationvariations of proprioceptive neuromuscular
facilitation tenchiques.
Electroenceph. clinical Neurophusiology. 1 986;63: 174-178
2) Muhlemann D, Cimino JA: Therapeutic Muscle Stretching.
In Functional
Soft Tissue Examination and Treatment by Manual Methods: The
Extremities by
Warren 1. Hammer. Aspen Publishers, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD,
1991
(3)Janda V, Schmid H: Muscles Fucntion Testing.
Butterworths. London,
1983
(4)Knight KL, Londeree BR: comparison of blood flow and the
ankle of uninjured subjects during therapeutic application of heat, cold,
and
exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,
Vol.12, No.1, Spring
1980
(5)Roy S, Irvin R: Sports Medicine Prevention, Evaluation,
Management, and
Rehabilitation. Englewood cliffs, Prentice - HaIl, 1983.
(6).Liebenson CS, ed. Rehabilitation of the Spine: A
Practitioner's
Manual. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkens, 1996.
D) MANAGEMENT TOPICS
17) Cervical (condition specific: - i.e.
whiplash, headache,
disc, myofascial)
A. Introduction:
The topic of cervical management
includes a general
coverage of pain and other symptoms arising from the cervical
spine. This
includes pain generators and how to identify them on examination,
e.g. myofascial
trigger points, zygapophyseal joint dysfiinctiondysfunction,
internal disc
disruption and radiculopathy. The flinctional functional
examination is discussed
in the context of the types of dysfiinctiondysfunction that be
are commonly seen
in the cervical spine patient, including the examination of
cervical flexion,
shoulder abduction (scapulohumeral rhythm), push up, hip
extension, sit-to-stand,
and swallowing movement pattern as well as the stepping test, and
tests for
cervical kinesthetic awareness. It also includes the principles
of diagnosis,
treatment, rehabilitation and overall management of the cervical
spine
patient.
The management strategies that are utilized are based on the
pain generator(s)
and the dysfiinctiondysfunction that is found. The initial
approach is geared
toward decreasing the pain of the primary generators. This
includes manipulation
for the zygapophyseal joints, ischemic compression, postisometric
relaxation and
physical agents for myofascial trigger points, McKenzie exercises
for the
intervertebral disc, and manipulation, McKenzie, traction and
physical agents for
radiculopathy. As quickly as possible, shift toward addressing
the primary
dysfunctiondysfimetion(s) occurs, again with the strategy
depending on the type
of dysfiinctiondysfunction that is present. This includes prop
riosensory
retraining in the presence of indication for the need for this
method (e.g.
positive stepping test, faulty hip extension movement pattern,
faulty one leg
stand or squat, faulty eye-head-neck coordination), cervical
stabilization in the
presence of instability (e.g. faulty cervical flexion, faulty
scapulohumeral
rhythm, faulty posture) and strength training in those isolated
cases that
require it.
Isotesting studies show cervical spine muscular capacity
deficiencies similar
to the low back and maymost frequently effect the posterior
muscles for both
acute and chronic patients. The following is most relevant:
- decreased strength overall
- altered extensor to flexor ratio
- (extensors should be >20% stronger)
Contrasting studies show anterior muscle
weakness(12-14).
Decreased strength and endurance in neck flexion has been
correlated with both
neck pain and headache. (12-14)
References
1.McKenzie RA. The Cervical and
Thoracic Spine:
Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. Waikanae, New Zealand,Spinal
Publications,
1990.
2.Lebenson CS, ed. Rehabilitation of the Spine: A
Practitioner's Manual.
Baltimore: Williams and Wilkens, 1996.
3.Saal 3A, Saal 35. Non~perativenonoperative treatment of
cervical
intervertebral disc with radiculopathy. Spine 1996;
21:1877-1883.
4.Jull G, Bogduk N, Marsland A. The accuracy of manual
diagnosis for cervical
zygapophyseal joint pain syndromes, Med JAust 1988;
148:233-236.
5.Janda V. Muscles and motor control in cervicogenic
disorders: assessment and
management. Tn: Grant R., ed.
Physical Therapy of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine. New
York: Churchill
Livingstone, 1994:195-216.
6.Revel M, Andre-Deshays C, Minguet M. Cervicocephalic
kinesthetic sensibility
in patients with cervical pain.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72; 288-291.
7.Gordon CR, Fletcher WA, Jones GM, Block EW. Is the stepping
test a specific
indicator of vestibulospinal
function?. Neurology 1995; 45:2035-2037.
8.Murphy DR. The sternocleidomastoid muscle: Clinical
considerations in the
causation of head and face pain. Cbiro Tech 1995;
7(1):12- 17.
9.Murphy DR, ed. Conservative Management of Cervical Spine
Syndromes.
10.Revel M, Minguet M, Gergoy P et al. Changes in
cervicocephalic kinesthesia
after a proprioceptive rehabilitation program in patients
with neck pain: a
randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;
75:895-899.
11. Jordan A et al: Cervicobrachio syndrome, neck
muscle function:
effects of rehabilitation, J Musculoskeletal Pain, 1: 283-8,
1993
12.Watson DH, Trott PH. Cervical headache: An
investigation of natural
head posture and upper cervical flexormuscle performance.
Cephalalgia 1993;
13:272-284.
13.Treleavan J, Jull 0, Atkinson L. Cervical museuloskeletal
dysfunction in
post~concussion headache. Cephalalgia 1994; 14:273-279.
14.Barton PM, Hayes KC. Neck flexor muscle strength, and
relaxation times
in normal subjects and subjects with
unilateral neck pain and headache. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
1996;
77:68O~87.
B. Whiplash: -
In the acute stage, the primary focus
is on
identifying pain generators and reducing the generation of pain
as quickly as
possible. Introduction of early movement is often possible, and
should be
encouraged. McKenzie protocols are helpful here (1).
Rapid transition
to more active forms of care should be sought (2) to
minimize the
development of scar tissue and the establishment of faulty
movement patterns. How
soon this transition occurs will depend upon the severity of the
injury and other
clinical factors. Goals should set with regard to return to work
and other ADL's
as quickly as possible. The rehabilitation phase should focus on
normalizing
cervical reflex and coordination finctionfunction focusing
particularly on eye-
head-neck coordination (3) and propriosensory
(4) and
stabilization flinction function (5). It should also
be focused on
normalizing any faulty movement patterns that may have been
detected,
particularly cervical flexion, shoulder abduction (scapulohumeral
rhythm),
breathing and hip extension.
In their monograph on whiplash associated
disorders,
Spitzer, et al state clearly that encouragement for activation is
essential in
the management of whiplash. Rest should be recommended cautiously
and should not
last more than 4 day. Manipulation is usefliluseful in the acute
stages for the
purpose of preparing the patient for more active approaches and
long-term
repeated manipulation is discouraged. Continued complaints and
residual
disability after 45 days justifies vigorous clinical intervention
and mandatory
interdisciplinary consultation.
References
1.Murphy DR. The passive/active care continuum: A model
for the treatment of spine related disorders. Neuromusculoskel Sys 1996; 4(1)1-7.
2.Fitz-Ritson D. The chiropractic management and
rehabilitation of
cervical trauma. J Manipulative PhysiolPhysical Ther 1990; 13:17-25.
3.Fitz-Ritson D. Phasic exercises for cervical
rehabilitation after
"whiplash" trauma. J Manipulative PhysiolPhysical Ther 1995 18(1)21-24.
4.Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy Jr), et al.
Scientific
monognaphmonograph of the Quebec Task Force on
Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and
its management.
Spine 1995; 20(85):25-735.
5.Murphy DR, ed. Conservative Management of Cervical Spine
Syndromes.
Appleton Lange (scheduled publication 1998)
C. Vertigo:
Treatment depends entirely on
diagnosis
1. Meniere's disease - manipulation and myofascial therapy for
any related
joint and/or muscle for ENT co-management.
2. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo - manipulation and
myofascial therapy
for any related joint and/or muscle dysflinctiondysfunction,
along with home
recommendation for labyrinthine stimulation exercises performed
at home.
3. Cervicogenic vertigo - this is usually posttraumatic and
management should
follow the outline for whiplash, with particular emphasis on
improving joint and
muscle flinction function in the upper cervical spine and
normalizing eye-
head-neck and propriosensory flinctionfunction
4. Cervical disequilibrium - manipulation and myofascial
therapy with
particular emphasis on the upper cervical spine
References
1.Kalburg M, Magnusson M, Malinstrom EM, et al.
Postural and
symptomatic improvement after physiotherapy in patients with dizziness of~~ suspected cervical origin.
Arch Phys MedEd
Rehabil Rehab 1996; 77:874-882.
2.Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the dizziness
handicap
inventory. Arch otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 1 l6:424~27.
3.Lewit K. Manipulative Therapy in the Rehabilitation of
the Motor System.
Boston: Butterworths, 1985.
4.Hulse M. Disequilibrium, caused by a flinctional functional
disturbance of
the upper cervical spine. Clinical aspects and differential diagnosis. Man Med 1983; 1:18-23.
5.Fitz-Ritson D. Assessment of cervicogenic vertigo. J
Manipulative
Physiol Ther 1991; 14(3):193-l 98. Murphy DR, ed. Conservative Management of Cervical Spine
Syndromes.
D. Headache
The conceptual foundation of the diagnosis
and management
approach is based on the known pathophysiological mechanisms
behind tension and
migraine headache. This understanding has evolved into the
concept of the tension
headache-migraine headache continuum (1). Treatment
will often involve
co-management with neurologist of other professional providing
biochemical
treatment depending where along the pathophysiology continuum the
patient lies.
This is determined via history and examination.
Treatment will be focused Initially on decreasing
the generation of pain by those structures that havethat has been identified as the primary pain generators (2,3). This will be combined with correction of relevant joint and/'or muscle dysfunctions (4,~,6). Special attention will be
placed on the detection and correction of faulty cervical flexion,
shoulder abduction (scapulohumeral rhythm), hip extension, sit-to-stand and swallowing
patterns.
References
1.Nelsen CF. The tension headache, migraine headache
continuum: A
hypothesis. J Manipulative PhysiolPhysical Ther 1994; 17 (3): 156-167.
2.Travell JG, Simons DG. Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The
Trigger Point
Manual. Vol.1.1983 Williams and Wilkens, Baltimore.
3.Murphy DR, ed. Conservative Management of Cervical Spine
Syndromes.
4.Watson DH, Trott PH. Cervical headache: An investigation
of natural head posture and upper cervical flexor muscle performance. Cephalalgia 1993; 13:272-284.
5.Treleavan J, Jull 0, Atkinson L. Cervical museuloskeletal
musculoskeletal
dysfunction in post~concussion headache. Cephalalgia 1994; 14:273-279.
6.Barton PM, Hayes KC. Neck flexor muscle strength, and
relaxation times in
normal subjects and subjects with unilateral neck pain and headache. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
1996; 77:68O~87.
18) Thoracic (condition specific: - i.e. thoracic
outlet syndrome,
myofascial)
A. Operational Definitions for
the Management
of Common Thoracic Conditions
1. Introduction
The topic of thoracic spine management
includes a
general coverage of pain and other symptoms arising from or
involving the
thoracic spine. This includes pain generators and how to identify
them on
examination, e.g. myofascial trigger points, zygapophyseal joint
dysfunction,
internal disc disruption and radiculopathy. The functional
examination is
discussed in the context of the types of dysfunction that be are
commonly seen
in the thoracic spine patient, including the examination of
faulty movement
patterns (1), particularly shoulder abduction
(scapulohumeral rhythm),
push up and breathing (2).
It also includes the principles of diagnosis, treatment,
rehabilitation and
overall management of the thoracic spine patient.
The management strategies that are
utilized are based on
the pain generator(s) and the dysfunction that is found. The
initial approach
is geared toward decreasing the pain of the primary generators.
This includes
manipulation for zygapophyseal joint dysfunction (1),
ischemic
compression, postisometric relaxation and physical agents for
myofascial trigger
points (2) and McKenzie exercises for intervertebral
disc disruption
(3). As quickly as possible, shift toward addressing
the primary
dysfunction(s) occurs (4), again with the strategy
depending on the
type of dysfunction that is present. This includes
manipulalation, postisometric
relaxation, postfacilitation stretch and cervicothoracic
stabilization
(5) and strength training (6) in those
isolated cases that
require it.
- Lewit K. Manipulative Therapy in the Rehabilitation of
the Locomotor System. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991.
- Janda V. Muscles and motor control in cervicogenic
disorders:
assessment and management. In: Grant R., ed. Physical Therapy of
the Cervical and
Thoracic Spine. New York: Churchill Livingstone,
1994:195-216.
- Mennel JM. Joint Pain. Boston: Little Brown,
1964.
- Travell JG, Simons DG. Myofascial Pain and
Dysfunction: The Trigger
Point Manual. Vol. 1. 1983 Williams and Wilkens, Baltimore.
- McKenzie RA. The Cervical and Thoracic Spine:
Mechanical Diagnosis
and Therapy. Waikanae, New Zealand, Spinal Publications,
1990.
- Liebenson CS, ed. Rehabilitation of the Spine: A
Practitionerrquote
s Manual. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkens, 1996.
- Saal JA, Saal JS. Non-operative treatment of cervical
intervertebral
disc with radiculopathy. Spine 1996; 21:1877-1883.
- Jordan A, Ostergaard K. Rehabilitation of
neck/shoulder patients in
primary health care clinics. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1996;
19(1):32-
35.
B) Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
The primary focus with this
condition should first
be identifying those tissues that are creating the neurovascular
compression that
is producing the symptoms. Close attention should be paid to
excessive tension
in the scalenes and pectoralis minor (1) and to
hypomobility of the
first rib (2,3). Next, focus should be placed on
those faulty
patterns and/or lifestyle habits that produced the compressive
dysfunction ,
particularly shoulder abduction (scapulohumeral rhythm), push up
(4),
breathing (5) and "Gothic Shoulders" posture
(6).
Treatment and rehabilitation should be geared toward improving ,
particularly
shoulder abduction (scapulohumeral rhythm), push up
(4), function in
the areas involved (7).
- Travell JG, Simons DG. Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction:
The Trigger Point
Manual. Vol. 1. 1983 Williams and Wilkens, Baltimore.
- Lindgren KA, Leino E. Subluxation of the first rib: a
possible
thoracic outlet syndrome mechanism. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;
68:692-695.
- Lindgren KA, Leino E, Manninen H. Cervical rotation
lateral flexion
test in brachialgia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 72:735-737.
- Janda V. Muscles and motor control in cervicogenic
disorders:
assessment and management. In: Grant R., ed. Physical Therapy of
the Cervical and
Thoracic Spine. New York: Churchill Livingstone,
1994:195-216.
- Lewit K. Manipulative Therapy in the Rehabilitation
of the Locomotor
System. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991.
- Swift TR, Nichols FT. The droopy shoulder syndrome.
Neurology 1984;
34:212-215.
- Murphy DR. Cervical radiculopathy and pseudiradicular
syndromes. In:
Murphy DR, ed. Conservative Management of Cervical Spine
Syndromes.
19) Lumbar (condition specific - i.e. disc, facet,
sacro-iliac,
myofascial)
A. General treatment parameters
Pain and disability should be
distinguished. Most
costs are due to disability, not pain. Pain comes and goes with
a high
recurrence rate in all cultures. Disability, is a uniquely
western, modern
epidemic. The primary goal of care is to prevent activity
intolerences due to
pain. (4)
The majority of patients recover. The majority do not.
Health care resources
are most concentrated on the chronic pain patient. More
efficient utilization
would result from earlier, aggressive treatment of subacute
patients who have
outlasted the natural history. (5)
Acute patients require diagnostic triage to rule out sinister
causes of back
pain, reassurance, activity modification advice, and simple pain
relief
approaches. Over the counter pain medication and/or manipulation
are recommended
for pain.
History and physical examination has excellent sensitivity and
specificity for
identifying red flags on sinister disease. Xray evaluation is
usually
unnecessary in the initial evaluation of low back problems.
(1,4).
Expensive diagnostic work-ups for subacute pain patients
should be replaced
with aggressive conservative care focusing on rehabilitation and
adhering to
biopsychosocial principles. (5)
1.The frequency and duration of care for different
disorders are
summarized as follows:
Sciatica - up to 16 weeks
Mechanical low back pain without risk factor - up to 6
weeks
Mechanical low back pain with risk factors - up to 16
weeks
2. Risk factors from CSAG, Mercy & AHCPR:
3. Frequency
3x/week for first month
gradually decreased frequency after that
4. Duration:
canrquote t exceed guidelines without documenting
progress w/ OArquote
s every 2 weeks
5. Realistic end points of care are:
pain relief
elimination of activity intolerances
return to work
functional restoration
B. Treatment Interventions
The effects of different interventions
for nerve root
and mechanical back pain have been evaluated (1). The
highest rated
statements receive 3 stars.
Acute LBP
- Manipulation speeds recovery for acutes ***
- -- 30% improvement w/in the 1st month.
- The risks of manipulation for low back pain are very low,
provided...it is
carried out by a trained therapist or practitioner. **
- McKenzie speeds recovery for acutes **
- Bed Rest for > 2 days slows recovery for acutes ***
- Advice on Staying Active leads to less chronic disability
***
- Graded Reactivation combined with behavorialbehavioral pain
management leads
to less chronic disability ***
- NSAIDs effectively reduce simple back ache...can have serious
adverse
effects... ***
- Muscle relaxants effectively reduce acute back pain. ***
- Muscle relaxants have significant adverse effects...even
after relatively
short courses (i.e. one week.) **
Chronic LBP
- [Do we want to address time limited manipulation in
chronics?]
- Some evidence points to the value of time-limited
manipulation. (6)
- Exercise programs and physical reconditioning can
improve pain and
functional levels in chronics **
Nerve Root Syndromes
- Bed rest for > 2 days slows recovery for nerve root
patients ***
- Stabilization training effective for nerve root & failed
back surgery
(not ranked) (2,3)
- Epidural injections are effective for nerve root
**
- manipulation? Cassidy studies
C. Typical activity modification
advice would
include:
- Limit prolonged unsupported sitting
(< 20
minutes)
- Limit heavy lifting
- Limit bending or twisting while lifting
D. Alternative symptomatic procedures to be considered when
treatment has
plateaued include (1):
- muscle relaxants
- antidepressants
- injections
- supports
- biofeedback
- acupuncture
References
1)Waddell G, Feder G, McIntosh A, Lewis M, Hutchinson A.
(1996) Low back
pain evidence review. London: Royal College of General
Practitioners.)
2) Saal JA, Saal JS: Nonoperative treatment of herniated
lumbar
intervertebral disc with radiculopathy. Spine
1989;14:431-437.
3) Timm KE. A randomized-control study of active and passive
treatments for
chronic low back pain following L5 laminectomy. JOSPT
1994;20:276-
286.
(4) AHCPR ref -- find and drop in
(5) Waddell G, The Back Pain Revolution, Churchill
Livingstone, Scheduled
Publication 1998.
(6) Triano, J. Get Ref
20) Upper extremity (application of rehabilitation
principles to
common orthopedic conditions)
In order to appropriately manage upper
extremity
injuries, the practitioner must have a sound grasp on the
orthopedic tests
related to the upper extremity, the common complications and
cause and effect
relationships associated with the upper quarter exam, and
biomechanics.
The shoulder girdle is a very dynamic structure, often
associated with overuse
injuries and abnormal biomechanical states often leading to the
chronic injury.
Full functional capacity of the shoulder girdle involves the
synchronization of
the Scapula Thoracic Glenohumeral, Acromial Clavicular and
Sternoclavicular
joints. Each play a particular role in the shoulders stability
and
function.(1)
Cervicothoracic compromise and thoracic outlet syndromes are
often associated
with long standing upper extremity disease processes. Particular
attention must
be directed toward scapular stabilization, rotator cuff internal
and external
rotation muscular balance(see #14), biomechanics and
proprioception.(2)(3)
Appropriate treatment of the upper Quarter requires
appropriate orthopedic and
functional evaluation, proprioceptive training, muscular strength
and balance,
endurance and functional flexibility. (6)(7)
Active treatment protocols include, but are not limited to
joint mobilization,
functional reinforcement, proprioceptive reinforcement and
appropriate
rehabilitation protocols(see #14-16).
The ultimate goal of upper extremity rehabilitation is to
obtain and then
maintain proper muscular balance to allow for normal integrated
function. The
critical concept in upper extremity rehab is to establish central
stability to
allow for optimal distal mobility. Cervicothoracic stabilization,
Scapulothoracic
and Scapulouhumeral rhythm must be present before optimal upper
extremity motion
can occur 8-12 . Restoration of Scapulothoracic and
Scapulohumeral
rhythm is accomplished by improving muscular balance, endurance
and
coordination.
If the dynamic stabilizers of the shoulder
girdle
(primarily the rotator cuff, biceps brachii and serratus
anterior) are well
coordinated and balanced, the function of the ligaments, capsule
and labral
mechanism will improve. This is accomplished through the concept
of dynamic
ligament tension. This allows for optimal humeral head to glenoid
fossa
congruency to be present. Cervicothoracic and Scapulothoracic
postural faults
(forward drawn head carriage, protracted shoulder girdle and
accentuated
cervicothoracic kyphosis) are commonly observed in upper
extremity disorders and
will disrupt this humeral head to glenoid tossa
relationship8,9.
Postural education is the foundation of maximizing coordinated
function of the
upper quarter.
References
1)Saha, AK: Mechanisms of shoulder movements and a plea
for the
recognition of "zero" position of the
glenohumeral joint. din Orthop 173: 3-10 1983
2)Panjabi MM, White M,: clinical Biomechanics of the
Spine, Philideiphia,
Lippencott company, 1978
3)Saha, AK Mechanics of elevation of the glenohumeral
joint. Acta Orthop
Scan 44: 668~78 1973
4)ChristensenKD: clinical chiropractic Biomechanics.
Dubuque, Foot
Levelers, Inc. 1984
5)Guffy GJ: Rehabilitating Shoulder Dysfunction: The
importance of
Scapular Stabilization. 1991 Whal and Associates
6)American college of Sports Medicine~s Guidelines for
Exercising Testing
and Prescription Fifth Edition, Williams and Wilkins, 1995
7)Wathen D. "Muscle Balance" in Essentials of Strength and
conditioning,
Baechie TR editor, National Strength and conditioning Association - Human Kinetics
pb, 1994
8) Liebenson C - Rehabilitation of the Spine: A
Practitioner's Manual.
Williams and Wilkens, 1995
9) Wilk K, Arrigo C - Current Concepts in
Rehabilitation of the
Athletic Shoulder. JOSPT I 8:1 July 1993
10) Souza T - Sports Injuries of the Shoulder, Churchill
Livingstone
1994
11) Sweeney T, Prentice C, Saal JA, Saal is -
Cervicothoracic Muscular
Stabilization Techniques. Physical Medicine
and Rehabilitation 4:2 June 1990
12) Jobe F, Moynes D, Brewster C 1987 - Rehabilitation of
Shoulder Joint
Instabilities. Orthop Clin North Am 18:3 July
21) Lower extremity (application of
rehabilitation principles to
common orthopedic conditions)
A. In order to appropriately manage
lower extremity
injuries, the practitcioner must have a sound grasp on the
orthopedic tests
related to the lower extremity, the common complications and
cause and effect
relationships associated with the lower quarter exam, and
biomechanics of
gait.
Due to constant gravitation forces and rotational functional
movements, the
lower extremity is constantly taxed biomechanically. Normal gait
patterns dictate
that rotational stress and gravitational loading be
accomodatedaccommodated for
by specific muscle balance, proprioception and coordinated
mevementmovement
patterns.(1)(2)
Plastic deformation from constant low force loading to
the arches leads
to overpronation, causing internal derangement of the tibia and
torsional
stresses at the knee.(3) Any alteration from the
normal chain of
events during gait causes abnormal biomechanics which leads to
repetativerepetitive trauma in the form of tendonitis, patellar
femoral syndrome,
and eventualloyeventually crepitus at the knee. This chronic
abnormal stimulation
will cause an increase in muscle imbalance of the inner and outer
quadracepquadricep muscle and the quad and hamstring in relation
to one another.
This muscle imbalance will cause valgus deformity inducing medial
collater and
meniscus trauma, ultimately leading to hip and sacroiliac
compensation and
instability.(4)(5) Appropriate muscle balance and
proprioceptive
training are essential to the stability of the lower extremity..
As noticed with
strength training only quality movements are beneficial to the
chronic abnormally
postured lower extremity. The importance of the VMO to knee joint
stability is
minor(6) in relation to the balance of the Quad I
Ham ratio,
which should follow normal strength factors. (see #14)
Active treatment of either the acute or chronically injured
lower extremity
includes but is not limited to specific joint mobilization,
proprioceptive
stimulation, functional and proprioceptive reinforcement, and
appropriate
rehabilitation protocols.
References
1)Schafer RC, Clinical Biomechanics Musculoskeletal
Actions and
Reactions, Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1983
2)Christensen Kim: Clinical Chiropractic Biomechanics.
Dubuque, Foot
Levelers, Inc. 1984
3)Stromberg D. Wiederhielm cA: Viscoelaxtic description of the
collagenous
tissue in simple elongation. J Appik Physiol 26: 857-862,
June 1969
4)RootML, William P0, weed JH: Normal and Abnormal
FucntionFunction of the
Foot. Los Angeles, clinical Biomechanics corportatincorporation,
Vo\lumeVolume
II - 1977
5)Paniabi MM, White AA,: clinical Biomechanics of the
Spine, Philadelphia, Lippencott company, 1978
6)Mcconnel J: Patellar Femoral Syndrome, Mcconnel Seminars
Los Angeles
1992
ln addressing the rehabilitation of
these ailments
several factors must be considered:
1.Analysis of the structural lesion [if it existsl and the
functional
lesion.
2.Examination of the different tissues involved
pathologically or
functionally.
3.Determination of primary and secondary diagnoses.
4.Treatment of the primary diagnoses via application of
appropriate
techniques to normalize tissue and modulate nociception/pain.
These will
include treatment ofjoint, fascia, muscle and neural tissue.
Manual
procedures, modalities and technical aids may be utilized.
e.g., an ankle
sprain, application of cryotherapy, manipulation of the tarsals,
ankle
support initially.
5.At the end of the treatment of the initial and acute
phase the basic
imbalances that have caused the acute destabilization of the
systems must then
be addressed ~secondary diagnoses] and an improvement of function
initiated. This
stage also requires further assessment of posture, breathing,
gross and fine
motor function via different functional coordination tests and
either restoring
function or compensating for the loss of function. Further
normalization of
tissue that may limit function is continued and then the task of
facilitating
efficient motor function is necessary. E.g. general
deconditioning of the lower
extremity and ligamentous laxity of the ankle joints require
rehabilitative
restoration of muscle balance, a strengthening protocol,
improvement of
proprioceptive feedback and muscle reaction time as obvious
goals. Psychological
factors must be taken into account as these could affect the
rehabilitation
outcome.
Different types of training are required for
this:-Strength,
speed, endurance, power, coordination proprioceptive1and skill
training is
necessary. These may be modulated by principles such as:-
- S.A.I.D - Specific adaptation to imposed demand.
- F.I.T.T.R.- frequency, intensity, type, time and rate of
progression through
the exercises.
- STABILIZATION I MOBILIZATION exercises
- OPEN and CLOSE CHAIN exercises
- OPEN and CLOSED SKILLS.
- PSYCHO-MOTOR SKILLS e.g. hand to eye coordination, left
brain- right brain
exercises should also be utilised.
- PSYCHOLOGICAL STRATEGIES may have to be employed, e.g.
auto-suggestion,
meditation etc.
References
ACSM, Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription.
Lea and Febiger,1991. NASM, Study guide, National academy of Sports
Medicine,1992.
JANDA, V., Lecture notes, 1996
LEWIT, K., Manipulative Therapy in the treatment of the
Locomotor System. Butterworth, 1992.
BALKE, B., The Fitness Handbook, Wellness Bookshelf, 1995.
REIL, J., The Psychology of Sport Injury. Human Kinetics,
1993.
SCHMIDT,R., Motor Learning & Performance, Human
Kinetics~1991.
ENOKA RM., Neuro mechanical basis of Kinesiology, Human
Kinetics,1994.
SAXTON-BULLOCK, J.E., Sensory changes associated with severe
ankle sprain, Scand journal of Rehabilitation Medicine,
27(3):161-167.
BYNUM, E.B. et al, Open versus closed chain kinetic exercises
after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.,AJSM, Vol 23, No.4:
401-405.
22) Management of common sports and industrial
injuries
Most common sports and industrial
injuries occur in
the soft-tissues of the extremities and result from acute trauma
or
repepitiverepetitive strain. The goal of care is to control pain
and inflammation
in the acute phase and restore normal neuromusculoskeletal
function in the
subacute and remodellingremodeling phases. A critical component
in the
rehabilitation is to fully integrate the extremity back into
it'sits role as a
key link in the entire locomotor system.
Essential to this process is an understanding of the
physiology of the acute
inflammatory, proliferative healing and remodellingremodeling
phases of tissue
repair. Appropriate use of passive therapies during the acute
phase inclusive of
modalitesmodalities, joint mobilisationmobilization, and
modificadonmodification
of activities of daily living and orthopedic appliances to
prevent further injury
is key to a prompt recovery. Less reliance on passive approaches
in lieu of
active protocols should be initiated as quickly as is clinically
prudent.
The goal of active rehabilitation is to restore preinjury
function to the
injury site inclusive of strength, endurance, flexibility,
agility and
coordination. As these goals are achieved, the extremity needs to
be reintegrated
back into it'sits role in the locomotor system by using full-body
stabilisationstabilization, proprioception and sensorimotor
retraining
techniques. The steps to recovery should include joint
mobilisationmobilization,
muscle relaxation and lengthening, increase speed of muscle
contraction, improved
control of movement, task specific training and mass movement
conditioning.
Strategies to achieve these objectives include knowledge of
isometric, isotonic
dynamic, isotonic variable and isokinetic strength training, open
verses closed
chain exercises, .post-isometric relaxation techniques, home
stretching
exercises, scapular and lumbopelvic stabilisationstabilization
exercises and the
use of wobble/rocker boards and balance sandals protocols.
Fundamental to optimal implimentationimplementation of
rehabilitation
techniques for common sports and industrial injuries is an
understanding of the
functional mechanics of gait, prehension and throwing.
- Bob Warkins chapter in Craig's
Book
23) Post-surgical spine
Spine rehabilitation principles are
similar in
the post-surgical and pre-surgical patient. The goals are to
restore
function. Obviously, a period of rest is required
post-surgically.
Walking can be encouraged almost immediately. Exercises sbould
begin in the
functional training range (FTR). This is defined as the painless
range in which
movements can be performed in a coordinated way. Usually the
FTR is narrow
at first as
the patient exhibits various mechanical sensitivities such as
to gravity
loading. The patient first learns to produce and then control
movements,
particularly at the lumbosacral junction.
Exercises which minimize the mass movement in the
lumbar spine are
emphasized. Sensory-motor training on rocker boards is an
example. Non-weight
bearing exercises emphasizing isometric trunk muscle activity and
isotonic arm
or leg movements are also used early in the program. Traction
assistance can be
added as an aid to reducing mechanical sensitivity. Supine, prone
or quadruped
exercises are all appropriate in the first few weeks. Recumbent
or aquatic
aerobic activities should also be used. Weight bearing exercise
should be
limited to walking at first.
Activity modifications should include limiting prolonged
unsupported sitting
to less than 20 minutes; limit heavy lifting; and limit bending
or twisting while
lifting. Ice may be encouraged for pain relief
Manipulation should be targeted to improve
extension
mobility in the lumbar spine and preventing end-range flexion
load on the lower
lumbar segments. Post-isometric relaxation or muscle energy
procedures may be
advisable at first. Hamstring tension should be relaxed and
quadriceps, guteal
and trunk extensor endurance be facilitated. It is important to
train the
coordination of stabilizer muscles such as the transverse
abdominus and
multifidus.
Stabilization exercises combined with McKenzie protocols
were successful
in a large randomized, controlled clinical trial for
failed back surgery
(laminectomies) patients (Timm). Hides, et al found that
stabilization exercises
were successful in restoring the size of atrophied multi fidus
musculature. By
combining advice about postural control with
manipulation to expand
the FTR and exercise to improve load handling ability, a
post-surgical
patient can be successfully rehabilitated.
1.R Richardson CA, Jull GA. Muscle
control - pain
control. What exercises would you prescribe? Manual Therapy
1995;l:2-lO.
2. Richardson CA, Jull GA. Muscle control - pain control.
What exercises would you prescribe? Manual Therapy
1:2-10,1995.
3. Richardson A, Jull CiA. Concepts of assessment and
rehabilitation for
active lumbar stability. in; Boyling JD, Palastanga N (eds)
Grieve's modern
manual therapy of the vertebral column 2nd edn. Churchill
Livingstone, Edinburgh
ch.5l p.705-720.
4. Morgan D. Concepts in functional training and postural
stabilization for
the low-back-injured Top Acute Care Trauma Rebabil 2;8,
1988.
5. Hyman J, Liebenson C. Spinal stabilization exercise
program. In
Liebenson C (ed) Spinlal Rehabilitation. A Manual of Active Care
Procedures.
Williams and Wilkins~ Baltimore 1996.
6. Saal JA, Saal JS: Nonoperativc treatment of herniated
lumbar
intervertebral disc with radiculopathy. Spine 1989,
14;431-437.
7. Timm KE. A randomized-control study of active and passive
treatments for
chronic low back pain following L5 laminectomy. JOSPT
1994;20.276-286.
8. Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull GA. Multifidus muscle
recovery is not
automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode of low back
pain Spine
1996;21(23).2763-2769.
9. Libenson C, Hynian J, Gluck N, Murphy D. Spinal
stabilization. Top Clin
Chiro l996;3 (3)60-74.
24) Multidisciplinary (tertiary
care/biobehavorial)
According to a recent North American Spine Society consensus
paper on
rehabilitation, tertiary care facilities are defined as being
interdisciplinary;
having a large, behavioral component; and utilizing ongoing
outcome assessment
(1). They should be considered for referral in
patients who have
remained symptomatic for 4-6 months or who have failed treatment
efforts which
included a trial of manipulation, rehabilitation, phycho1ogical
referral &
alternative symptomatic procedures. This Constitutes about ~-8%
of the pain
population.
Tertiary care centers typically have a large behavonal
component. Teaching
appropriate coping strategies is considered essential for
chronic pain
management. The focus is on reduction of activity, increasing
exercise
tolerance/quota, learning self-treatment strategies, reducing
medication
dependency, and Stress reduction.
According to Nass, "Many pts who do not respond to
non-op tx wIm
4-6 n~os have a history of sig. psychosoci~1 dl s~ tders~
1in~ited comp~iance~
and inhibition pfphysical ftinction as evidenced by pain
sensitivity,.
I1()noI~~anic ~rjg1~5, and demonstrated deficie~ies in physical
and lt~nctional
capacity testing.'~ (1).
1) Mayer TO~, Polatin P, Smith B, Snuth C, Satchel R,
Hening SA, Iiall H
et al. Contemporary concepts in spine care. Spine rehabilitation of secondary and
tertiary nonoperative care. Spine 20:18,2060-2066, 99-.
According to a recent North American Spine
Society
consensus paper on rehabilitation, tertiary care facilities are
defined as being
interdisciplinary; having a large, behavioral component; and
utilizing ongoing
outcome assessment (1). They should be considered for
referral in
patients who have remained symptomatic for 4-6 months and have
failed treatment
efforts which included a trial of manipulation, rehabilitation,
psycho1ogical
referral & alternative Symptomatic procedures. This
Constitutes about 8% of
the pain population.
Tertiary care centers typically have a large behavioral
component. Teaching
appropriate coping strategies is considered essential for chronic
pain
management. The focus is on reduction of activity
intolerences/disabilities,
increasing exercises tolerance/quota, learning self-treatment
strategies,
reducing medication dependent,
and stress
reduction.
According to Nass, "Many patients who do not respond
to non-operative
treatment within 4-6 mos have a history of significant
psychosocial disorders,
limited compliance and inhibition of physical function as
evidenced by pain
sensitivity,. nonorganic signs, and demonstrated deficiencies in
physical and
functional capacity testing. (1).
1)Mayer TG, Polatin P, Smith B, Snuth
C, Gatchel R,
Hening SA, Hall H et al. Contemporary concepts in spine care.
Spine
rehabilitation - secondary and tertiary nonoperative care.
Spine 20:18,2060-
2066,
Appendix C: Sample Test Questions
Delphi Topic # 2 Answer = C
Subtalar supination is associated with:
A. a lowered medial arch and an unlocked midtarsal joint
B. loose-packing of the midtarsal and intertarsal joints
C. a raised arch, a locked midtarsal joint, and foot
stability
D. palpation of the talar head just posterior to the navicular
tuberosity
Delphi Topic # 3 Answer = D
Which of the following muscles do [not] commonly substitute for an inhibited gluteus medius?
(A) Tensor fascia lata
(B) Quadratus lumborum
(C) Piriformis
(D) Iliocostalis lumborum
Delphi Topic # 4 Answer = A
When there is hypertonicity of the left sternocleidomastoideus muscle, the typical head presentation is:
(A) anterior translation with right rotation
(B) anterior translation with left rotation
(C) extension with no rotation
(D) extension with left rotation
Delphi Topic #5 Answer = A
Which of the following phases of gait is the lower extremity kinetic chain considered to be closed?
(A) Stance
(B) Toe-off
(C) Heel strike
(D) Swing
Delphi Topic #8 Answer = C
The Oswestry low back disability questionnaire includes which of the
following categories of functional assessment?
(A) Running
(B) Squatting
(C) Lifting
(D) Climbing
Delphi Topic #9 Answer = B
Lifting danger is minimized by all the following except:
(A) maintaining the normal lordosis
(B) lifting after sitting relaxed for 20 minutes
(C) not lifting immediately after rising from bed
(D) avoiding twisting
Delphi Topic # 11 Answer = C
Status: AMcKenzierquote s "three syndrome" classification
system of spinal disorders is based on:
(A) static palpation findings and biomechanical analysis of
imaging
studies
(B) motion palpation findings and leg length testing
(C) mechanical and symptomatic responses to loading
(D) symptomatic, but [not] mechanical responses to loading
Delphi Topic #15 Answer =
The Harvard method is used for which of the following?
(A) To test muscle strength
(B) To test flexibility
(C) To test muscle endurance
(D) To test aerobic capacity
Delphi Topic #16 Answer = C
Flexibility training:
(A) emphasizes static stretching
(B) emphasizes ballistic stretching
(C) emphasizes post-isometric relaxation techniques
(D) is contra-indicated in the low back pain patient
Delphi Topic #19 Answer = D
The best time to lift objects is:
(A) in the morning
(B) after resting in a chair for 30 minutes
(C) after stretching into forward flexion
(D) after performing extension exercises
Delphi Topic #20 Answer = D
During early rehabilitation of the shoulder, which of the following should
be addressed first?
(A) Strength with resistance tubing
(B) Plyometric power with mediball throwing
(C) Endurance with high repetitions
(D) Improve glenohumeral congruency with weight shifts or cuff
co-contractions
Delphi Topic #22 Answer = C
Status: During throwing mechanics, which phase requires plyometric
power?
(A) Wind-up
(B) Cocking
(C) Acceleration
(D) Follow through