INCREASED UTILIZATION OF SPINAL MANIPULATION BY CHIROPRACTORS TO TACKLE THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC
 
   

Increased Utilization of Spinal Manipulation by
Chiropractors to Tackle the Opioid Epidemic

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:
   Frankp@chiro.org
 
   

FROM:   Medical Care 2021 (Dec 1); 59 (12): 1039–1041 ~ FULL TEXT

Benjamin J. Eovaldi, DO and Brad McAlpine, DC

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health,
University of Massachusetts Medical School,
Worcester, Massachusetts

MA Hudsonville Chiropractic,
Hudsonville, MI.



Increased utilization of spinal manipulation performed by chiropractors may be one approach to dampening the opioid epidemic through practices that minimize the use of those drugs for conditions like low back pain where opioid prescribing remains high. [1] Opioids have been found to be ineffective for low back pain while causing multiple side effects such as addiction, drug diversion, and overdose. [2] In response to the opioid epidemic, over half of the states have made legislative changes limiting the quantity and duration of opioid prescriptions for acute pain. [3] In addition, the American College of Physicians has recommended spinal manipulation as part of the nonpharmacological firstline treatment for low back pain since 2017. [4] Efforts such as these have been impactful. From 2017 to 2018, there was a 13.5% decrease in the prescription opioid-involved death rate. [5] In addition, the rate of opioids dispensed in the United States decreased from 72.4 to 46.7 per 100 persons from 2006 to 2019. [6] Despite progress made, prescription opioids were associated with 28% of opioid-related overdose deaths in 2019. [7]

There are more articles like this @ our:
OPIOID EPIDEMIC Page and our


NON-PHARMACOLOGIC THERAPY Page



Spinal Manipulation Decreases Opioid Use

Systemic reviews and meta-analyses of 26 randomized clinical trials of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for acute low back pain and 47 randomized clinical trials of SMT for chronic low back pain found SMT performed by chiropractors, physical therapists, and other providers to be relatively safe and associated with modest improvements in pain and function. [8, 9] However, the most significant benefit of SMT may be its association with decreased opioid use among patients who receive it. In 2020, Whedon et al [10] demonstrated in a retrospective cohort study of 101,000 patients treated by a chiropractor and a primary care physician for spinal pain had half the risk of filling an opioid prescription compared with patients seen by a primary care physician alone. In 2018, a crosssectional study by Lisi et al [11] found a reduction in the rate of opioid prescription from 15.9% to 11.5% among 14,025 veterans receiving chiropractic care following their initial chiropractic visit.

The retrospective and cross-sectional designs of these studies and their lack of information regarding the subject’s racial/ethnic background and income level prevent establishing causation and introduce the potential for confounding, respectively. There is an additional limitation for the cross-sectional study regarding generalizability due to the study’s inclusion criteria which required that subjects have at least 1 visit to both Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care and chiropractic services. Last, a recent review and meta-analysis by Corcoran et al [12] found that patients treated for spinal back pain with chiropractic services had a 64% lower odds of being treated with opioids than patients not seen by a chiropractor. The review and meta-analysis has limitations due to only 6 research articles meeting the inclusion criteria; 5 were retrospective cohort studies. One was a prospective cohort study that defined exposure as back injury and not chiropractic treatment. [13]

The main limitation of the observational studies mentioned above, common to many chiropractic services studies where a randomized control design may not be possible, is selection bias due to the subject’s self-selection to the chiropractic services group. It is possible that patients who choose to receive chiropractic care also favor nonpharmacological treatments and are inherently opposed to being treated with opioid medications, independent of receiving chiropractic services. In addition, racial/ethnic and income level are important patient characteristics to consider when interpreting chiropractic research.

In 2006, Davis et al [14] reported that 92.3% of chiropractic patients were White, and only 3.7% were Black. Last, the retrospective and crosssectional studies mentioned did not report the spinal disease severity of their subjects. Only one of the studies in the review and meta-analysis by Corcoran and colleagues reported the severity of the spinal disease. Therefore, subjects receiving chiropractic services may have had less painful spinal disease than patients treated by primary care providers only.



Insurance Coverage for Spinal Manipulative Therapy

In the United States, most private insurance plans, State Workers Compensation programs, and Medicare/Medicaid programs provide reimbursement for chiropractic services. However, often with exceptions, such as chiropractic services only being covered to correct spinal subluxation. A crosssectional study of 45 Medicaid, commercial, and Medicare Advantage plans by Heyward and colleagues found that physical therapy was frequently and consistently regarded as medically necessary for low back pain by insurance policies. At the same time, chiropractic services were determined medically necessary for low back pain by 50% of the commercial health insurance policies sampled. The other 50% considered chiropractic services medically necessary only if preconditions were present. [15]

Further, insurance policies do not cover the evaluation by chiropractors needed to diagnose the required precondition. A potential barrier to insurance coverage for chiropractic services is that some health plans are concerned about liability and malpractice insurance costs associated with chiropractic services. In a review of 48 litigation cases against chiropractors, Hartnett et al [16] found that 94% of claims following chiropractic care involved SMT. Health care changes are currently being made to promote nonpharmacological treatment for low back pain. For example, under a new UnitedHealthcare policy, patients who see a chiropractor or physical therapist as their first contact provider for low back pain will be billed zero dollars out-of-pocket for their first 3 visits. [17]

“With millions of Americans experiencing low back pain currently or at some point during their lifetimes, we believe this benefit design is already making a meaningful difference by improving health outcomes and reducing costs, both of which are important amid the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and opioid epidemic.” Said Russell Amundson, MD, a neurosurgeon and senior medical director for UnitedHealthcare (R. Amundson, personal communication, 2020, written form).



Improving Integration of Chiropractors in the Primary Care Setting

One method for increasing the utilization of SMT is by increasing provider referrals to chiropractors and improving collaboration among all treating providers in a team approach. Referrals are already standard practice with physical therapy, facilitating communication between referring providers and physical therapists regarding patient care. For chiropractic services, the current system relies heavily on patient selfreferral. [18]

Self-referral limits communication and collaboration between chiropractors and primary care providers and promotes segmented patient care. An additional approach to increasing the utilization of spinal manipulation is to have chiropractors physically located in outpatient medical centers. “Having chiropractors integrated into the primary health team as nonprescribing frontline providers for patients with back pain will improve health care by decreasing patient dependence and addiction to opioid medications.” Said Ian Coulter, RAND Corporation, Senior Health Policy Researcher (I. Coulter, personal communication, 2020, oral and written form).

Outside of the private health care setting, the VA has demonstrated that chiropractors can be integrated into current health systems where there is interest in doing so. Currently, there are over 150 VA health care facilities in the United States offering in-house chiropractic services. [19] In the private health care setting, a survey of chiropractors found that integrated chiropractors reported more patient referrals and communication regarding shared patient care through direct face-to-face communication and shared electronic medical records than chiropractors in traditional standalone chiropractic practices did. [18]



Conclusions

Increasing the utilization of spinal manipulation by chiropractors to reduce opioid use among patients with low back pain is a possible strategy to combat the opioid epidemic. Randomized clinical trials of SMT by chiropractors and other providers have demonstrated an association with modest improvement in pain and function in patients with acute and chronic low back pain.

Observational studies have demonstrated a negative association of opioid use among subjects receiving chiropractic services. Experimental studies designed to assess causality should be conducted to strengthen the evidence that SMT by chiropractors decreases opioid use among patients. Such evidence would support the expansion of chiropractic integration including increased referrals, improved collaboration with primary care physicians, and physical integration, as seen in the VA.

In addition, stronger evidence would support the expansion of insurance coverage for chiropractic services and reduction in reimbursement gaps between chiropractic services and physical therapy.



References:

  1. Kamper SJ, Logan G, Copsey B, et al.
    What is Usual Care for Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review of Health Care
    Provided to Patients with Low Back Pain in Family Practice and Emergency Departments

    Pain. 2020 (Apr); 161 (4): 694–702

  2. Deyo RA, Von Korff M, Duhrkoop D.
    Opioids for low back pain.
    BMJ. 2015;350:g6380.

  3. Davis CS, Lieberman AJ, Hernandez-Delgado H, et al.
    Laws limiting the prescribing or dispensing of opioids for acute pain in the
    United States: a national systematic legal review.
    Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;194:166–172.

  4. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA;
    Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain:
    A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians

    Annals of Internal Medicine 2017 (Apr 4); 166 (7): 514–530

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
    Opioid overdose, understanding the epidemic; 2021. Available at:
    www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/index.html
    Accessed June 22, 2021.

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
    Opioid overdose, US opioid dispensing rate maps; 2020. Available at:
    www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/maps/rxrate-maps.html
    Accessed June 22, 2021.

  7. National Institute on Drug Abuse.
    Trends & statistics, overdose death rates; 2021. Available at:
    www.drugabuse.gov/drug-topics/trendsstatistics/overdose-death-rates
    Accessed June 22, 2021.

  8. Paige NM, Myiake-Lye IM, Booth MS, et al.
    Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy with Clinical Benefit and Harm
    for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    JAMA. 2017 (Apr 11); 317 (14): 1451–1460

  9. Rubinstein SM, de Zoete A, van Middelkoop M, et al.
    Benefits and Harms of Spinal Manipulative Therapy for the Treatment of
    Chronic Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    of Randomised Controlled Trials

    British Medical Journal 2019 (Mar 13); 364: l689

  10. Whedon JM, Toler AWJ, Kazal LA, Bezdjian S, Goehl JM, Greenstein J.
    Impact of Chiropractic Care on Use of
    Prescription Opioids in Patients with Spinal Pain

    Pain Medicine 2020 (Dec 25); 21 (12): 3567–3573
    There are more like this at: SPINAL PAIN MANAGEMENT

  11. Lisi AJ, Corcoran KL, DeRycke EC, et al.
    Opioid Use Among Veterans of Recent Wars Receiving
    Veterans Affairs Chiropractic Care

    Pain Med. 2018 (Sep 1); 19 (suppl_1): S54–S60

  12. Corcoran KL, Bastian LA, Gunderson CG, et al.
    Association Between Chiropractic Use and Opioid Receipt Among
    Patients with Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Pain Medicine 2020 (Feb 1); 21 (2): e139–e145

  13. Franklin GM, Rahman EA, Turner JA, et al.
    Opioid use for chronic low back pain: a prospective, population-based study
    among injured workers in Washington State, 2002–2005.
    Clin J Pain. 2009;25:743–751.

  14. Davis, MA, Sirovich, BE, and Weeks, WB.
    Utilization and Expenditures on Chiropractic Care
    in the United States from 1997 to 2006

    Health Serv Res. 2010 (Jun); 45 (3): 748-761

  15. Heyward J , Jones CM , Compton WM , et al .
    Coverage of Nonpharmacologic Treatments for Low Back Pain
    Among US Public and Private Insurer

    JAMA Network Open 2018 (Oct 5); 1 (6): e183044

  16. Hartnett DA, Milner JD, Kleinhenz DT, et al.
    Malpractice litigation involving chiropractic spinal manipulation.
    World Neurosurg. 2021;149: e108–e115.

  17. UnitedHealthcare.
    New UnitedHealthcare benefit for low back pain helps reduce invasive procedures
    and address the opioid epidemic; 2019. Available at:
    www.unitedhealthgroup.com/newsroom/2019/2019-10- 29-uhc-benefit-low-back-pain
    Accessed June 22, 2021.

  18. Salsbury SA, Goertz CM, Twist EJ, Lisi AJ.
    Integration of Doctors of Chiropractic Into Private Sector Health Care Facilities
    in the United States: A Descriptive Survey

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 (Feb); 41 (2): 149–155

Return to OPIOID EPIDEMIC

Return to INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE

Return NON-PHARMACOLOGIC THERAPY

Since 12-09-2020

                       © 1995–2022 ~ The Chiropractic Resource Organization ~ All Rights Reserved