Table iChanges in effect size or SOE between the 2018 report and the 2019 update report

ConditionIntervention (Comparator)Outcome, TimingPrior (2018) Report2019 UpdateChange
Exercise (vs. , , or placebo)Function, short term

Small effect

Low

6 RCTs (N=553)

Small effect

Moderate

9 RCTs (N=1,056)

upgraded one level
Pain, short term

Small effect

Moderate

6 RCTs (N=553)

Moderate effect

Low

10 RCTs (N=1,098)

Effect size upgraded one level; downgraded one level
Physical modalities: Interferential therapy (vs. placebo)Function and pain, short termNo evidence

No effect

Low

1 new (N=150)

New evidence
Mind-body practices: Yoga (vs. or )Function, short term

Small effect

Moderate

6 RCTs (N=922)

Moderate effect

Moderate

8 RCTs (N=1,149)

Effect size upgraded one level
Pain, short term

Moderate effect

Low

5 RCTs (N=770)

Small effect

Low

7 RCTs (N=997)

Effect size downgraded one level
Neck painExercise (Pilates) (vs. acetaminophen)Function, short term

Insufficient evidence

1 (N=40)

Small effect

Low

1 new trial (N=64)

upgraded one level, new evidence
Pain, short term

Insufficient evidence

1 (N=40)

Large effect

Low

1 new trial (N=64)

upgraded one level, new evidence
Manual Therapies: Massage (vs. or )Function, short term

No effect

Low

1 (N=58)

Small effect

Low

2 RCTs (N=150)

Effect size upgraded one level
Pain, short termNo evidence

Moderate effect

Low

1 new (N=92)

New evidence
Knee Exercise (vs. , , sham or )Function, intermediate term

Small effect

Low

9 RCTs (N=637)

Moderate effect

Low

11 RCTs (N=879)

Effect size upgraded one level
Pain, long term

No effect

Low

2 RCTs (N=914)

Small effect

Low

4 RCTs (N=1,199)

Effect size upgraded one level
Exercise (vs. acetaminophen and NSAIDs)Function and Pain, intermediate termNo evidence

No effect

Low

1 new (N=93)

New evidence
Psychological Therapies: /MI/pain coping skills training (vs. )Pain, Short term

No effect

Low

2 RCTs (N=222)

Small effect

Low

2 new trials (N=210)

Effect size upgraded one level, new evidence
Physical Modalities: continuous and pulsed US (vs. sham)Function and pain, Short term

Small effect

Low

1 (N=90)

No effect

Low

3 RCTs (N=249)

Effect size downgraded one level
Exercise (vs. , , sham or )Pain, intermediate term

No effect

Moderate

7 RCTs (N=327)

Small effect

Moderate

8 RCTs (N=362)

Effect size upgraded one level
Psychological Therapies: , biofeedback, guided-imagery (vs. , , )Function, Short term

Small effect

Low ()

2 RCTs Pooled (N=97)

No effect

Low ()

3 RCTs Pooled (N=169)

Effect size downgraded one level
Function, Intermediate term

Small effect

Low ()

2 RCTs Pooled (N=176)

1 (N=82)

Moderate effect

Low ()

3 RCTs Pooled (N=280)

1 (N=82)

Effect size upgraded one level
Mindfulness Practices: , MAT (vs. or )Function and pain, Intermediate termNo evidence

Small effect

Low

1 (N=148)

New evidence
Mind-Body Therapies: Yang Style tai chi (vs. exercise)Function, Short- and intermediate termNo evidence

Small effect

Low

1 (N= 181)

New evidence
Function, Long termNo evidence

No effect

Low

1 (N=158)

New evidence

AC = attention control;
CBT = cognitive-behavioral therapy;
FM = fibromyalgia;
LBP = low back pain;
MAT = meditation awareness training;
MBSR = mindfulness-based stress reduction;
MI = Motivational Interviewing (IMPAACT);
NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug;
NT = no treatment;
OA = osteoarthritis;
RCT = randomized controlled trial;
SOE = strength of evidence;
UC = usual care;
WL = waitlist.

a

SOE downgraded; addition of 4 new trials increased inconsistency/heterogeneity across trials

b

Differences in study quality and pharmacological therapies precluded pooling of the trial included in the prior report (poor quality; NSAIDs and muscle relaxants) with the new trial (fair quality; acetaminophen); both trials reported effect sizes in the same direction (favoring exercise) though the differences were not statistically significant in the trial included in the previous (2018) report.

c

The two previously included trials (1 fair, 1 poor) averaged effects across time frames finding no difference between groups. Only the two new fair quality trials could be pooled at this time frame.