Table 12Chronic low back pain: manual therapies (spinal manipulation)

Author, Year, Followup, Pain Duration, Study QualityInterventionPopulationFunction and Pain OutcomesOther Outcomes

Bronfort, 2011

9 months

Duration of pain: 5 years

Fair

A. Standard manipulation (n=100), 12-24 sessions over 12 weeks

B. Exercise (supervised) (n=100)

C. Exercise (home) (n=101)

A vs. B

Age: 45.2 vs. 44.5 vs. 45.6 years

Female sex: 67% vs. 57% vs. 58%

Baseline Modified (0-23): 8.7 vs. 8.4 vs. 8.7

Baseline pain (0-10 ): 5.4 vs. 5.1 vs. 5.2

A vs. B

4 months

Modified (0-23): 4.9 vs. 4.0 vs. 4.2, adjusted difference 0.5 (95% −1.0 to 2.1) for A vs. B and 0.7 (95% CI −0.9 to 2.3) for A vs. C

Pain (0-10 ): 3.3 vs. 2.9 vs. 3.1, adjusted difference 0.3 (95% −0.5 to 1.0) for A vs. B and 0.1 (95% CI −0.6 to 0.9) for A vs. C

9 months

Modified (0-23): 5.1 vs. 3.8 vs. 4.1, adjusted difference 0.4 (95% −1.2 to 2.0) for A vs. B and −0.1 (95% CI −0.7 to 0.5) for A vs. C

Pain (0-10 ): 3.3 vs. 2.8 vs. 2.8, adjusted difference 0.3 (95% −0.5 to 1.1) for A vs. B and 0.3 (95% CI −0.6 to 1.1) for A vs. C

A vs. B

4 months

SF-36 PCS (norm-based mean=50): 48.6 vs. 50.6 vs. 49.1, adjusted difference −1.8 (95% −4.4 to 0.9) for A vs. B and −0.3 (95% CI −3.0 to 2.4) for A vs. C

SF-36 MCS (norm-based mean=50): 55.9 vs. 54.8 vs. 55.1, adjusted difference 0.4 (95% −2.0 to 2.9) for A vs. B and −0.5 (95% CI −3.0 to 2.1) for A vs. C

OTC pain medication use, past week (days): 1.6 vs. 1.4 vs. 1.5, adjusted difference 0.4 (95% −0.4 to 1.1) for A vs. B and 0.4 (95% CI −0.3 to 1.2) for A vs. C

9 months

SF-36 PCS (norm-based mean=50): 48.4 vs. 50.4 vs. 49.6, adjusted difference −1.7 (95% −4.2 to 0.8) for A vs. B and −1.0 (95% CI −3.5 to 1.5) for A vs. C

SF-36 MCS (norm-based mean=50): 55.2 vs. 53.9 (8.6) vs. 56.0, adjusted difference 2.4 (95% −0.2 to 5.0) for A vs. B and −2.2 (95% CI −4.9 to 0.5) for A vs. C

OTC pain medication use, past week (days): 1.8 vs. 1.8 vs. 1.6, adjusted difference 0.1 (95% −0.8 to 0.9) for A vs. B and 0.4 (95% CI −0.4 to 1.3) for A vs. C

Ferreira, 2007

10 months

Duration of pain: Not reported

Fair

A. Standard manipulation and mobilization (n=80), 12 sessions over 8 weeks

B. Exercise (motor control) (n=80)

C: Exercise (general exercise) (n=80)

A vs. B vs. C

Age: 54 vs. 52 vs. 55 years

Female: 70 % vs. 66% vs. 70%

Baseline (0-24): 12.4 vs. 14.0 vs. 14.1

Baseline pain (0-10 ): 6.2 vs. 6.3 vs. 6.5

A vs. B vs. C

4 months

(0-24): 7.7 vs. 8.4 vs. 10.1, difference 0.2 (95% −1.5 to 1.9) for A vs. B and −0.9 (95% CI −2.7 to 0.9) for A vs. C

Pain (0-10 ): 4.3 vs. 4.3 vs. 4.8, difference 0.0 (95% −0.9 to 0.8) for A vs. B and −0.5 (95% CI −1.4 to 0.3) for A vs. C

10 months

(0-24): 9.2 vs. 8.8 vs. 9.6, difference 1.8 (95% 0.0 to 3.6) for A vs. B and 1.2 (95% CI −0.6 to 3.0) for A vs. C

Pain (0-10 ): 4.9 vs. 4.9 vs. 5.2, difference 0.1 (95% −0.8 to 1.0) for A vs. B and −0.2 (95% CI −1.1 to 0.6) for A vs. C

A vs. B vs. C

4 months

Patient Specific Functional Scale (3-30): 17.3 vs. 16.4 vs. 15.0, difference 0.7 (95% −1.3 to 2.7) for A vs. B and 1.7 (95% CI −0.4 to 3.,8) for A vs. C

10 months

Patient Specific Functional Scale (3-30): 15.2 vs. 15.7 (6.8) vs. 13.9, difference −0.8 (95% −2.9 to 1.2) for A vs. B and 0.3 (95% CI −1.7 to 2.3) for A vs. C

Gibson, 1985

2 months

Duration of pain: 2 to 12 months

Poor

A. Manipulation (technique unclear) and mobilization (n=41), 4 sessions over 4 weeks

B. Placebo (detuned short-wave diathermy) (n=34)

A vs. B

34 vs. 40 years

Female: 61% vs. 32%

Baseline pain (0-100 ): 35 vs. 48

A vs. B

1 month

Pain (median [range], 0-100 ): 28 (0−96) vs. 27(0-80)

3 months

Pain (median [range], 0-100 ): 25 (4-90) vs. 6 (10-96) p<0.01

A vs. B

1 month

Using analgesics: 25% vs. 50%

3 months

Using analgesics: 18% vs. 22%

Gudavalli, 2006

11 months

Duration of pain: >3 months

Fair

A. Flexion–distraction manipulation (n=123), 8-16 sessions over 4 weeks

B. Exercise (n=112)

A vs. B

Age: 42 vs. 41 years

Female: 34% vs. 41%

Baseline (0-24): 6.64 vs. 6.84

Baseline pain (0-100: 38.00 vs. 35.70

A vs. B

2 months

(0-24): 3.50 vs. 3.75

Pain (0-100 ): 16.52 vs.12.04

5 months

(0-24): 3.89 vs. 3.42

Pain (0-100 ): 18.26 vs. 8.92

11 months

(0-24): 3.90 vs. 3.77

Pain (0-100 ): 17.10 vs. 12.36

Haas, 2014

10.5 months

Duration of pain: 11 to 12 years

Fair

A. Standard spinal manipulation (n=100), 6 sessions over 6 weeks

B. Standard manipulation (n=100), 12 sessions over 6 weeks

C. Standard manipulation (n=100), 18 sessions over 6 weeks

D: Attention control (minimal massage) (n=100)

A vs. B vs. C vs. D

Age: 41 vs. 42 vs. 41 vs. 41

Female: 49% vs. 49% vs. 52% vs. 49%

Baseline Modified Von Korff functional disability (0–100): 44.8 vs.46.1 vs.45.2 vs. 45.2

Baseline Pain (0–100 ): 51.0 vs. 51.6 vs. 51. vs. 52.2

Baseline Von Korff pain intensity (0–100): 51.0 vs. 51.6 vs. 51.5 vs. 52.2

A vs. B

4 months

Von Korff functional disability (0-100): 25.6 vs. 24.0 vs. 24.1 vs. 27.1, adjusted difference −1.4 (95% −7.2 to 4.5) for A vs. D, −3.4 (95% CI −9.3 to 2.4) for B vs. D, and −2.9 (95% CI −8.8 to 2.9) for C vs. D

Von Korff functional disability improved ≥50%: 51.5% vs. 59.8% vs. 54.0% vs. 49.5%, adjusted difference 2.5% (95% −11.5 to 16.5%) for A vs. D, 10.4% (95% CI −3.4 to 24.3%) for B vs. D, and 4.8% (95% CI −9.1 to 18.6%) for C vs. D

Von Korff pain intensity (0-100): 32.5 vs. 33.7 vs. 32.1 vs. 34.9, adjusted difference −1.7 (95% −6.9 to 3.4) for A vs. D, −0.8 (95% CI −6.0 to 4.4) for B vs. D, and −2.4 (95% CI −7.6 to 2.9) for C vs. D

10.5 months

Von Korff functional disability (0-100): 22.6 vs. 22.4 vs. 19.1 vs. 28.0, adjusted difference −5.2 (95% −10.9 to 0.5) for A vs. D, −5.9 (95% CI −11.8 to −0.1) for B vs. D, and −8.8 (95% CI −14.4 to −3.3) for C vs. D

Von Korff functional disability improved ≥50%: 57.6% vs. 57.7% vs. 62.0% vs. 58.9%, adjusted difference −1.1% (95% −14.8 to 12.6%) for A vs. D, −1.4% (95% CI −15.4 to 12.6%) for B vs. D, and 2.7% (95% CI −11.0 to 16.5%) for C vs. D

Von Korff pain intensity (0-100): 30.7 vs. 31.9 (vs. 28.7 vs. 36.5, adjusted difference −5.4 (95% −11.1 to 0.4) for A vs. D, −4.6 (95% CI −10.3 to 1.2) for B vs. D, and −7.6 (95% CI −13.2 to −2.0) for C vs. D

A vs. B

4 months

SF-12 PCS (norm-based mean=50): 50.5 vs. 51.4 vs. 50.9 vs. 50.0, adjusted difference 0.0 (95% −2.4 to 2.3) for A vs. D, −0.8 (95% CI −3.2 to 1.6) for B vs. C, and −1.3 (95% CI −3.6 to 1.1) for C vs. D

SF-12 MCS (norm-based mean=50): 52.8 vs. 50.8 vs. 51.3 vs. 51.8, adjusted difference −2.1 (95% −4.2 to 0.0) for A vs. D, −0.7 (95% CI −2.8 to 1.3) for B vs. D, and −0.1 (95% CI −2.2 to 2.1) for C vs. D

EuroQoL (0-100): 77.8 vs. 77.0 vs. 74.5 vs. 73.9, difference −2.9 (95% −6.9 to 1.0) for A vs. D, −1.4 (95% CI −5.5 to 2.6) for B vs. D, and −1.5 (95% CI −5.8 to 2.7) for C vs. D

10.5 months

SF-12 PCS (norm-based mean=50): 50.8 vs. 52.6 vs. 52.5 vs. 50.7, adjusted difference −0.3 (95% −2.1 to 2.7) for A vs. D, −1.4 (95% CI −4.0 to 1.2) for B vs. D, and −2.2 (95% CI −4.5 to 0.2) for C vs. D

SF-12 MCS (norm-based mean=50): 50.4 vs. 50.6 vs. 50.4 vs. 51.3, adjusted difference −0.2 (95% −2.7 to 2.3) for A vs. D, −1.1 (95% CI −3.7 to 1.6) for B vs. D, and 0.3 (95% CI −2.3 to 2.9) for C vs. D

EuroQoL (0-100): 77.1 vs. 77.3 vs. 77.2 vs. 74.8, adjusted difference −1.3 (95% −5.4 to 2.7) for A vs. D, −0.9 (95% CI −4.9 to 3.1) for B vs. D, and −3.3 (95% CI −7.2 to 0.5) for C vs. D

Hondras, 2009

4.5 months

Duration of pain: Mean 9 to 13 years

Fair

A. Standard manipulation (n=96), 12 sessions over 6 weeks

B. Flexion distraction manipulation (n=95), 12 sessions over 6 weeks

C: Usual care (n=49)

A vs. B vs. C

Age: 64 vs. 62 vs. 63 years

Female: 45% vs. 44% vs. 41%

Baseline (0-24), mean: 6.5 vs. 6.6 vs. 5.7 Baseline pain (0-100 ): 42.1 (23.6) vs. 42.5 (25.2) vs. 42.4 (24.5)

1.5 months

(0-24): adjusted difference −1.5 (95% −3.1 to 0.1) for A vs. C and −2.2 (95% CI −3.7 to −0.6) for B vs. C

Global improvement from baseline (1-10): adjusted difference 1.3 (95% 0.2 to 2.3) for A vs. C and 1.6 (95% CI 0.5 to 2.7) for B vs. C

4.5 months

(0-24): adjusted difference −1.3 (95% −2.9 to 0.6) for A vs. C and −1.9 (95% CI −3.6 to −0.2) for B vs. C

Global improvement from baseline (1-10): adjusted difference 1.7 (95% 0.5 to 2.8) for A vs. C and 1.8 (95% CI 0.6 to 3.0) for B vs. C

Senna, 2011

9 months

Duration of pain: 18-19 months

Poor

A. Standard manipulation (n=25), 12 sessions over 4 weeks

B. Standard manipulation maintained (n=26), 12 sessions over 4 weeks, plus every 2 weeks for 9 months

C. Sham manipulation (n=37)

A vs. B

Age: 40 vs. 42 vs. 42 years

Female: 27% vs. 24% vs. 24%

Baseline function (0-100 ): 39 vs. 40 vs. 38

Baseline pain (0-100 ): 42 vs. 43 vs. 41

A vs. B

3 months

(0-100): 29.8 vs. 23.1 vs. 33.5; p>0.05

Pain (0-100 ): 35.2 vs. 25.9 vs. 35.2; p>0.05

6 months

(0-100): 32.2 vs. 22.4 vs. 35.3; p>0.05

Pain (0-100 ): 35.5 vs. 25.4 vs. 36.8; p>0.05

9 months

(0-100): 34.9 vs. 20.6 vs. 37.4

Pain (0-100 ): 38.5 vs. 23.5 vs. 38.3

A vs. B

3 months

SF-36, total (0-100): 29.2 vs. 32.8 vs. 26.4; p>0.05

6 months

SF-36, total (0-100): 27.8 vs. 33.1 vs. 26.1; p>0.05

9 months

SF-36, total (0-100): 27.6 vs. 33.70 vs. 25.9; p>0.05

BEAM Trial Team, 2004

9 months

Duration of pain: >3 months in 59%

Fair

A: Standard manipulation (n=353), 8 sessions over 12 weeks

B: Usual care (n=338)

C: Exercise (n=310)

A vs. B vs. C

Age: 42 vs. 42 vs. 44

Female: 63% vs. 53% vs. 55%

Baseline (0-24): 8.9 and 8.9 vs. 9.0 vs. 9.2

Baseline Von Korff Pain (0-100): 61.4 and 61.6 vs. 60.5 vs. 60.8

A vs. B

9 months

(0-24): 5.15 vs. 6.16, adjusted difference −1.01 (95% −1.81 to −0.22)

Von Korff Disability (0-100): 29.85 vs. 35.50, adjusted difference −5.65 (95% −9.72 to −1.57)

Von Korff Pain (0-100): 41.68 vs. 47.56, adjusted difference −5.87 (95% −10.17 to −1.58)

A vs. C

9 months

(0-24): 5.15 (0.29) vs. 5.74 (0.31)

Von Korff Disability (0-100): 29.85 (1.50) vs. 29.73 (1.68)

Von Korff Pain (0-100): 41.68 (1.58) vs. 41.54 (1.84)

A vs. B

9 months

SF-36 PCS (0-100): 44.18 vs. 42.50, adjusted difference 1.68 (95% 0.18 to 3.19)

SF-36 MCS (0-100): 48.09 vs. 46.41, adjusted difference 1.68 (95% −0.21 to 3.57)

A vs. C

9 months

SF-36 PCS (0-100): 44.18 (0.55) vs. 44.39 (0.63)

SF-36 MCS (0-100): 48.09 (0.69) vs. 46.77 (0.81)

= confidence interval; MCS = Mental Component Summary; = not reported; = Numeric Rating Scale; = Oswestry Disability Index; OTC = over-the-counter; PCS = Physical Component Score; = Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; SF-12 = Short-Form 12 Questionnaire; SF-36 = Short-Form 36 Questionnaire; = visual analog scale

a

Unless otherwise noted, followup time is calculated from the end of the treatment period

From: Results

Cover of Noninvasive Nonpharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review Update
Noninvasive Nonpharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review Update [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 227.
Skelly AC, Chou R, Dettori JR, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

External link. Please review our privacy policy.