|  |  | 
      
        
        
          | April 
            2002 White House CAM Commission holds final meeting, issues 
            report by Dr. Veronica Gutierrez, Commission members  
The final 
            meeting of the White House Commission on Complementary and 
            Alternative Medicine Policy (WHCCAMP) was held Feb. 21-22 in 
            Washington, D.C., following 60 days of intensive conference calls 
            and e-mails between the staff and commission members in an attempt 
            to reach general agreement on the contents of the final 
            document.
 When I was appointed to the Commission, I 
            had four personal goals to achieve for chiropractic:
 
 
 
 1. Introduction and acceptance of the Association of Chiropractic 
            Colleges Paradigm on Chiropractic.
 
 2. Clarification of terminology (e.g., spinal adjustment vs. 
            spinal manipulation; clinical necessity vs. medical necessity, 
            chiropractic vs. chiropractic medicine).
 
 3. More research funding for models other than neck- and low-back 
            pain and the medical research model.
 
 4. Student loan forgiveness for chiropractic students willing to 
            work in areas designated as MUAs/Medically Underserved areas.
 
 The ACC paradigm was submitted early on in my participation. It 
            was reaffirmed and introduced again in December 2001 by Dr. Fabrizio 
            Mancini. The Commission accepted it.
 
 Throughout the Commission document, all terminology referring to 
            chiropractic met my objectives.
 
 The research recommendations are all inclusive of chiropractic 
            research in the areas of health and wellness, as well as quality of 
            life issues.
 
 The big barrier was related to the student loan forgiveness. One 
            of the Commission members stated over and over again that Congress 
            had determined that chiropractors were not primary care providers 
            and, therefore, could not serve in the MUAs and receive loan 
            forgiveness. At first, I was unable to discovery what 
            "determination" this member was referring to.
 
 Eventually, I uncovered the fact that two bills were submitted to 
            Congress-S. 1281 and S.1533. The former included chiropractors in 
            the National Health Service Corps/NHSC. However, the bill, as 
            written, states that: "(1) Chiropractic doctors are skilled at 
            providing a wide range of primary health care services, and (2) 
            Chiropractic doctors are often the only providers available to 
            provide health care in many rural areas.
 
 The problem with this wording is that the Public Health Service 
            Act defines "primary care health services" as health services 
            involving "family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, 
            obstetrics and gynecology, dentistry, or mental health, that are 
            provided by physicians or other health professions."
 
 Senate Bill 1533 was introduced by Sen. Kennedy and included 
            chiropractic. Section 317 of that bill authorized the establishment 
            of a demonstration project to provide for the participation of 
            doctors of chiropractic and pharmacists in the Loan Repayment 
            Program contained in section 338B of the bill. It is the intent of 
            the committee in approving this demonstration project that 
            participation be broad-based and comprehensive, and that the 
            Secretary ensure the scope of the demonstration project reaches to 
            all regions of the country.
 
 My statements to the Commission have urged that chiropractors 
            engaged in "MUA" services should be allowed to be health care team 
            members as defined by the ACC Paradigm, with the practice of 
            chiropractic a unique and clearly different approach to health 
            promotion-disease prevention.
 
 In my last communication with the Commission on this issue, I 
            stated, "From the first meeting, my position has been that 
            chiropractors deserve an opportunity to serve and prove that they 
            have a unique and desirable approach to healthcare. Chiropractic has 
            proven to be safe and effective and chiropractors are valuable 
            health care team members. It's not possible to accept that 
            individuals living in areas designated as MUAs are less deserving of 
            free choice in health care than others... If, at the end of a 
            demonstration project, chiropractic does not prove to be a service 
            of choice; is not proven to be safe and effective, or have any 
            value, then and only then do chiropractors not deserve to 
            participate nor the public receive the service."
 
 This needs to be accomplished legislatively. I've stated before 
            the Commission that the Public Health Services Act was written when 
            the medical model was the politically dominant one. Congress has 
            become aware of the consumer movement's interest in non-allopathic 
            approaches and care, and Congressional intent appears now to be 
            responsive to meeting that need. A joint effort on the part of all 
            of the national associations and chiropractic colleges could very 
            easily define the practice of chiropractic for the 21st century.
 
 I would like to publicly thank everyone who responded to my 
            request to testify before the Commission. Those who testified, and 
            their area of testimony, included:
 
 *** Drs. Stuart & Theresa Warner, Chiropractic and 
            Children;
 
 *** Dr. Christopher Kent, the Council on Chiropractic Practice 
            Guidelines and supporting research;
 
 *** Dr. Patrick Gentempo, chiropractic philosophy and existing 
            outcomes assessment tools;
 
 *** Dr. Donald Epstein, wellness;
 
 *** Dr. John Adams, information and dissemination issues;
 
 *** Drs. Charles and Marion Tedres-Masarsky, Somatovisceral 
            Aspects of Chiropractic, An Evidence-Based Approach;
 
 *** Ron Hendrickson, ICA, background on chiropractic;
 
 *** Dr. Robert Blanks, wellness research;
 
 *** Dr. Brian McAulay, the need for college-based research 
            funding;
 
 *** Dr. Jerry Hardee, the role chiropractors can play as 
            healthcare team members in MUAs;
 
 *** Dr. Fabrizio Mancini, the chiropractic college curriculum and 
            training of chiropractors; and Dr. Ed Owens, chiropractic 
            research.
 
 In addition, I wish to thank Ron Rupert of Palmer College for 
            gathering and listing all subluxation related research documents; 
            and the Chiropractic Leadership Alliance for taped interviews with 
            three cutting edge chiropractic researchers (Drs. Holder, Morter, 
            and Epstein).
 
 Other individuals chiropractors and organizations offered oral 
            and written testimony, as well. Chiropractic definitely was 
            heard.
 
 The complete WHCCAMP is available online at the Commission 
            website at http://whccamp.hhs.gov/finalreport.html.
 
 (Dr. Veronica Gutierrez is a member of the Board of Directors of 
            the World Chiropractic Alliance and the only chiropractor appointed 
            to serve on the White House CAM Commission. She also chairs the WCA 
            Council on Women's Health and maintains a successful practice in the 
            state of 
        Washington.)
 
 
 |  
 
 |