We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more Impact of a complex nutraceutical supplement on primary tumour formation and metastasis in <em>Trp53<sup>+/–</sup></em> cancer-prone mice | Oxford Academic

Table II.

The number of Trp53+/– mice developing tumours was 30% fewer in supplemented animals

 Untreated Supplemented % Difference Chi-square 
Number Number 
Mice affected by tumoursa 34/41 83 26/45 58 30 P = 0.018 
Observed tumour types 
    Sarcoma 19/38 50 17/43 40 20 P = 0.378 
      Osteosarcoma 13/38 34 8/43 19 44 P = 0.132 
      Soft-tissue sarcoma 6/38 16 7/43 16 – P > 0.05 
      Astrosarcoma 0/38 1/43 – P > 0.05 
      Chondrosarcoma 0/38 1/43 – P > 0.05 
    Carcinoma 16/38 42 6/43 14 67 P = 0.006 
      Adenocarcinoma 14/38 37 6/43 14 62 P = 0.021 
      Basosquamous carcinoma 2/38 0/43 – P = 0.217 
    Lymphoma 9/38 24 5/43 12 50 P = 0.239 
    Pheochromocytoma 2/38 0/43 – P = 0.217 
    Multiple tumour burdenb 13/38 34 4/43 74 P = 0.012 
    Metastasis 7/38 18 0/43 100 P = 0.004 

Types of tumours observed and their frequencies are compared in the table. Significant probabilities for DSP impacts are bolded.

aTotal tumour burden includes thee untreated mice and two treated mice that were not submitted for complete biopsy but that had large abdominal tumours characteristic of soft-tissue sarcomas. Only mice that had complete necropsy reports were included in the analysis of tumour types. If the five tumour mice are excluded from the total cancer comparison, the percent reduction in cancer by the supplement becomes 32% (P < 0.0096).

bNumber of mice diagnosed with two or three different primary types of tumours.