CHIROPRACTIC EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DYSFUNCTION IN INFANTS DEMONSTRATING DIFFICULTY BREASTFEEDING
 
   

Chiropractic Evaluation and Treatment of
Musculoskeletal Dysfunction in Infants
Demonstrating Difficulty Breastfeeding

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:
   Frankp@chiro.org
 
   

FROM:   J Clinical Chiropractic Pediatrics 2004 (Dec); 6 (1): 349–366 ~ FULL TEXT

Sharon Vallone, DC, FICCP

Private Practice,
68 Hartford Turnpike,
Tolland, Connecticut 06084.



Objective:   Breastfeeding during the first year of an infant’s life is currently supported and promoted by lactation consultants, midwives, naturopaths, chiropractors and allopathic physicians. In 1997, the American Academy of Pediatrics1 and in 1998, the World Health Organization2 published their position papers that advocated breastfeeding as the optimal form of nutrition for infants. This study was to investigate problems interfering with a successful breastfeeding experience and to see if proper lactation management, with the chiropractor acting as a member of a multidisciplinary support team, can help to assure a healthy bonding experience between mother and infant.

Methods:   25 infants demonstrating difficulties breastfeeding were evaluated for biomechanical dysfunction potentially resulting in an inability to suckle successfully. The biomechanics of 10 breastfeeding infants without complaint were also evaluated for comparison.

Results:   An overview of the infants with breastfeeding difficulty revealed imbalanced musculoskeletal action as compared to the infants without difficulty breastfeeding. Utilization of soft tissue therapies and chiropractic adjustments of the cranium and spine resulted in improved nursing in over 80% of the patients.

Conclusions:   The results of this study suggest that biomechanical dysfunction based on articular or muscular integrity may influence the ability of an infant to suckle successfully and that intervention via soft tissue work, cranial therapy and spinal adjustments may have a direct result in improving the infant’s ability to suckle efficiently

  Keywords: chiropractic, subluxation, vertebral subluxation complex, spinal manipulative therapy, chiropractic adjustment, craniosacral therapy, myofascial release, massage therapy, breastfeeding, lactation, latch, suckle, breastfeeding dysfunction



From the Full-Text Article:

INTRODUCTION

Breastfeeding during the first year of an infant’s life is currently supported and promoted by lactation consultants, midwives, naturopaths, chiropractors and allopathic physicians. In 1997, the American Academy of Pediatrics [3] and in 1998, the World Health Organization [4] published position papers that advocated breastfeeding as the optimal form of nutrition for infants. In an attempt to alleviate problems interfering with a successful breastfeeding experience, biomechanical as well as organic (including genetic and congenital) causes should be investigated. Early lactation management, with the chiropractor acting as a member of a multidisciplinary support team can help to assure a healthy bonding experience between mother and infant.

The ability to suckle in a newly delivered, full term infant, may be impaired or disorganized due to neurologic immaturity (gestational age) or a mild to severe neurologic or musculoskeletal problem [5] as a result of several possible situations:

  1. Injury (as a result of traction/manipulation/intervention either manually or with forceps or vacuum suction).

  2. Asphyxiation (premature placental separation/cord entanglement/etc.).

  3. Congenital deformities like a high palatal arch, cleft palate, ankyloglossia or an anatomically short tongue.

  4. A genetic developmental disorder like Pierre Robin or Down Syndrome.

  5. Pharmacologic suppression by drugs administered to the mother during childbirth.

  6. Invasive procedures to clear meconium, gastric lavage, or insertion of an airway which could result in oral aversion.

A fetus may also create a neurologic imprint in the uterus by sucking his or her own thumb, fist, arm or leg thus creating nipple confusion. Any of a number of delays in putting the baby to breast immediately after delivery (unresponsiveness of a mother who has been anesthetized, procedural delays, i.e. stitching an episiotomy, medical interventions for the infant) or the introduction of plastic nipples or formula supplementation due to nursery mismanagement may interfere with the nursing couple getting off to a good start. [6–8] And last but not least, there may exist a number of biomechanical or muscular problems.

These biomechanical or neuromuscular problems could include:

  1. A decreased excursion of the mandible preventing the neonate from opening widely enough to encompass the nipple and areola.

  2. A decrease in the cervical range of motion, which controls their ability to position themselves comfortably in their mother’s arms or at the breast.

  3. A neurologic deficit manifesting as a lack of suckling or rooting reflexes.

  4. An ineffective latch due to altered lip or tongue action.

  5. Impaired respiration (restriction in thoracic excursion or diaphragmatic action or lack of patent airway).

  6. A rapid milk ejection reflex (MER) or overabundant milk supply might result in compensatory muscle action (clenching, etc.) to modulate milk flow.

A literature review reveals case studies by Cuhel and Powell, Vallone, Krauss, Hewitt and Scheader [9–13] describing biomechanical dysfunction of the cranium and spine potentially resulting in dysfunctional nursing and associated symptoms. Chiropractic management demonstrated an improvement or resolution of the majority of complaints.

This paper presents an overview of 25 cases of infants presenting with breastfeeding issues at the referral of their lactation consultant (LC), midwife or physician, or in some cases, referred by parents who were chiropractic patients themselves.



BACKGROUND

Extensive research, especially in recent years, documents diverse and compelling advantages to infants, mothers, families, and society from breastfeeding and the use of human milk for infant feeding. These include health, nutritional, immunologic, developmental, psychological, social, economic and environmental benefits.

Epidemiologic research shows that human milk and breastfeeding infants provide advantages to general health, growth, and development, while significantly decreasing risk for a large number of acute and chronic diseases. There are also a number of studies that indicate possible health benefits for mothers as well as prevent the negative emotions (anger, guilt, failure, and disappointment) around an unsuccessful breastfeeding or bonding experience. [14]

Hewitt recounts a 1980 study of 239 breastfeeding mothers in which 59% of the mothers who ceased to breastfeed at 22 weeks related that it was associated with the infant’s ability to nurse properly. [15] Hewitt, like this author was interested in examining a variety of potential neuromusculoskeletal causes for this breastfeeding dysfunction.



METHODS

Ten successfully breastfeeding neonates were examined during their well baby visit. There was no complaint of difficulty breastfeeding (infants demonstrated a secure latch, appropriate flanging of the lips, appropriate number of swallows/minute and a lack of deformation of the mother’s nipple after nursing), nor any associated cranial or cervical dysfunction. Mothers of 25 neonates were self referred or referred to the chiropractic office by other health care professionals when other intervention measures failed to resolve breastfeeding difficulties.

Evaluation of the neonates as performed by the lactation consultant, midwife or allopathic physician was preliminary to their referral to our office. [16] Briefly, it involved a visual and digital examination of the infant’s mouth and palate as appropriate, as well as assessing the mobility and action of the tongue and upper lip (neurologically as well as if they are limited by the length of their frenula) and the infant’s reflexive response to stimulus, including, but not limited to the suckling and rooting reflexes. [17]

The chiropractic evaluation involved specific questions (Appendix A) for each of the mothers about their prenatal and postnatal history, history of labor and delivery including medications and interventions employed, the neonate’s perinatal history including APGAR scores, assessment of intact infantile reflexes (rooting and suckling) at birth, when and where the neonate was first breastfed (and the conditions and assistance as appropriate), description of the neonate’s latch , the anatomy of the mother’s breast/ nipple and whether any supplementation has been used. Mothers were also asked to identify their referral source. The final question involved the chief complaint as it pertained to the neonate and the mother. This included, but was not limited to the neonate’s inability to latch well or to flange lips, shape of the mouth at rest and when open (yawning, crying), inability to open the mandible far enough to encompass the nipple, inability of tongue to work the nipple towards the palate efficiently (for example, the tongue would push the nipple out of the mouth instead of drawing it into the mouth), noise (clicking, slurping), strength of suction, frequency of swallow, how frequently the neonate pull’s off the nipple during the latching process or during a feeding, and preference for one breast over the other. The mother was asked questions concerning abrasions or anatomical deformation of the nipple (flattening, curving, bending) after breastfeeding. As noted earlier, problems may be compounded or created after the first week for a mother with an overactive milk ejection reflex (MER) or an over abundant milk supply. Either might secondarily interfere with the neonate’s ability to nurse and result in compensatory changes in muscle tone to modulate milk flow.

It was hypothesized that an alteration in the function of the nervous system, musculature or joints might result in biomechanical dysfunction, potentially resulting in an inability to suck successfully. All the infants were examined for neurologic integrity (as measured by the use of infantile automatisms [18]), osseous integrity (ruling out fracture of the skull, mandible, clavicle, etc), muscular tone and strength as well as joint function and subluxation. The term subluxation [19] is used in this context to refer to a joint of the body whose movement is limited in one or multiple planes of motion and this fixation has neurologic, vascular and lymphatic implications on its own and on the surrounding tissues and organs.

Assessment of the symmetry of the facial structures, mandibular excursion (with or without deviation), tone of facial and cervical musculature, craniosacral assessment [20, 21] of cranial bones and dural tension or torque, motion palpation [22] of individual vertebral segments for subluxation, and tongue action (ability to move the tongue forward sufficiently to support and cup the nipple and areola in order to form it into a teat untethered by a shortened frenulum or other soft tissue restriction [23]) were performed on each infant.



CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Of the 10 infants examined who presented without complaint, mothers related in their history that there were minimal complications prenatally or during labor and delivery, minimal medication and interventions employed, minimal musculoskeletal abnormalities were detected and those detected did not appear to interfere with breastfeeding.

Table 1–14
See page 25

One mother, who did not realize that pain during breastfeeding was not normal, was referred for treatment of yeast infection and her infant referred for chiropractic evaluation. (TABLES 1–4)

An overview of the cases demonstrating dysfunctional nursing revealed an imbalanced musculoskeletal action predominantly associated with mandibular excursion and oral manipulation of the nipple (TABLES 5–14). The infants could not open their mouths wide enough to encompass the breast tissue, could not close their mouth to form the appropriate suction or use their tongue effectively to milk the nipple for nourishment.

In a majority of the cases, there was detected an imbalance in tone of musculature of the jaw and neck and/or dysfunctional motion of the hyoid and the temporomandibular joint, cervical vertebrae, most frequently at the occipitoatlantal complex, or the bones of the skull.

Of the patients reviewed in this study, the most significant prenatal problem may have been in-utero constraint due to multiple in-utero residents, a septal defect causing a heart shaped uterus, and the presence of fibroids. Other hypothesized causes of in utero constraint could be adhesions from previous surgeries or traumas (seat belt injuries in motor vehicle accidents), pelvic subluxation. 10 of 25 mothers received anesthesia during labor and delivery and 10 of 25 interventions were performed including Caesarean Section, forceps, vacuum suction and gross manipulation due to shoulder dystocia and cord entrapment.

Twenty–five infants presented between the ages of 1 day and 3 months with the chief complaint of dysfunctional breastfeeding. In all but 2 cases, the infant’s ability to latch onto the breast appeared to be impaired due to dysfunction in oral excursion or lip and tongue action. In 2 cases, the problem appeared to be associated with cervical spine dysfunction.

Of the 25 infants, 24 were put to breast at birth (one premature infant was not put to breast for 2 weeks). Mothers were counseled in proper latch, tongue training techniques and exercises, positioning and ergonomic correction as appropriate for their complaint by their lactation consultant, midwife, La Leche League leader or physician. Despite these efforts, the infant’s breastfeeding was still impaired.

Five infants were supplemented with formula (bottle fed) at the recommendation of their pediatrician who feared weight loss or dehydration. Six infants were finger fed with formula or breast milk in an attempt to provide nourishment while maintaining skin to skin contact to avoid nipple confusion until the baby could be placed at the breast. In several cases, problems were compounded by incompatible nipple to mouth size, inversion and damage to the mother’s nipple as a result of poor breastfeeding technique and rapid let down reflex.

Musculoskeletal assessment revealed 18 out of the 25 infants evaluated demonstrated restriction and/or deviation in mandibular excursion. In general, evaluation of associated musculature demonstrated hypertonic changes although there was one documented incident of hypotonia of the associated musculature (Case 1). A predominance of hyperactive muscle activity occurs involving the occipital muscles (10:25; all associated with occipital subluxation), the internal pterygoids (14:25) and the submandibular muscles (15:25 involving the digastric and omohyoid muscles). Other muscles intimately associated with the oral manipulation of the nipple are the obicularis oris and the depressor anguli oris muscles and 7 of 25 infants had hypertonic activity of this muscle group. Likewise, temporalis (6:25) and masseter muscles (5:25) may affect mandibular excursion preventing the infant from opening the mouth wide enough to encompass the nipple.

In several more infants, hypertonicity of the scalenes (1:25), sternocleidomastoid (1:25), and the erector muscles of the spine (3:25) might be involved in restricted range of motion and or hyperextension of the spine while nursing.

Although tongue action was altered in several infants (8:25), only one infant demonstrated a short frenulum but did not require surgical intervention once the mandibular excursion was improved.

Evaluation of cranial and vertebral motion utilizing craniosacral technique [24, 25] and motion palpation 26 revealed dysfunction of the parietals (8:25), glabella (1:25), temporals (8:25), frontals (5:25), sphenoid (8:25), occiput (23:25), maxilla (3:25), mandible (6:25), hyoid (8:25), nasal/vomer/ethmoid complex (2:25). The temporomandibular joint was the site of condylar deviation and edema in 4 of 25 cases and the hard palate was either malformed (high arch) or asymmetrical in 3 cases.

In this group, cervical dysfunction was limited to C1 and presented as a subluxation in 18 of 25 infants with the predominance into extension. There were no presenting thoracic subluxations and only one lumbar subluxation. The integrity of sacral motion was disrupted in 9 of 25 infants with an associated increase in dural tension detected in all 25 infants utilizing craniosacral methods of evaluation cited earlier.



TREATMENT

Treatment consisted of manual therapies including craniosacral therapy [27, 28], Logan Basic [29] to reduce dural torque, myofascial release [30] and massage to reduce hypertonic muscle activity and gentle manual diversified chiropractic adjustments of associated subluxated cranial bones and vertebral segments. Massage is described as effleurage and manual lymphatic drainage to improve circulation and metabolic balance within the muscle and inhibit pain and reflexogenic guarding. [31] Further discussion of massage techniques are discussed in Appendix I.

Treatment number ranged from 1 to 12 sessions with an average of 3 treatments/infant.



RESULTS

Greater than 80% of the presented infants experienced improvement in latch and ability to breastfeed (23:25). One continued to experience “clicking” indicating the intake of air during nursing, one experienced improvement but was discharged for surgical intervention of an unrelated problem, and one discontinued nursing at the suggestion of the pediatrician who felt mother’s milk supply was insufficient to provide adequate nourishment for the infant. 2 infants were eliminated from treatment: one due to a medical emergency and one due to the mother’s decision to seek the assistance of a medical physician specializing in lactation management.

These 4 mothers were polled 6–8 weeks after termination of treatment and none of their infants were breastfeeding.



DISCUSSION

Methods of intervention have been implicated in injury to infants at birth32 33. Manual manipulation of an entrapped cord or lodged extremity can inadvertently result in traction injury or fracture. Consider case #4, when, during a rapid delivery, the umbilical cord was found to be around the infant’s neck and had to be severed in utero. This infant demonstrated a depressed shoulder and winging scapula most likely from the traction forces applied to the cervical spine, shoulder and the dorsal scapular nerve (C 4/5) during this procedure.

Forceps and vacuum suction have been implicated in simple cranial molding as well as more extreme injuries like fractures or subdural bleeding. In the cases presented here, several cranial faults might be causally related to manual or mechanical intervention. For example, case #15, where forceps applied to the temporal area might be implicated in bilateral temporal bone compression.

It is conceivable, that constraint in the uterus can cause mechanical derangement resulting in ineffective breastfeeding mechanics as illustrated in the case of twins (where the crown of one twin’s head abutted the temporomandibular area of the second twin) and the cranial faults of the infants born to mothers with a septal defect causing a heart shaped uterus or fibroids which alter the diameter and contractility of the uterus.

As previously noted, although anesthesia has been implicated in pharmacologic repression of suckling instinct, the effect appeared to be minimal in this sampling (potentially 1:25).

In this study, the infants’ mothers received counseling from lactation consultants, midwives, La Leche League leaders or medical physicians. The infants were not brought for chiropractic evaluation until all customary methods of resolution had been attempted. This made it possible to evaluate the premise that biomechanical or neuromuscular problems could interfere with successful breastfeeding.

In most cases, chiropractic evaluation revealed the presence of an alteration in muscle tone and neurologic integrity (loss of suckling and rooting reflexes; inefficient action of the tongue) or an alteration in muscle action across a subluxated joint due to altered range of motion (i.e. reduced mandibular excursion secondary to derangement of the temporomandibular joint.). In certain cases, subluxation of cervical segments were associated with a decreased ability to range the cervical spine which prevented the neonate from maintaining an efficient position latch at the breast.

In an attempt to understand the mechanism of injury and resultant dysfunction, Arcadia observed 1,000 infants in a clinical setting and 800 or 80% demonstrated problems with breastfeeding caused directly from “cranial imbalances from the birth trauma. The pressure on the cranium before crowning is in a cephalad to caudad direction. The temporal bone, sphenoid, maxilla and mandible are pushed caudad, possibly causing severe spasm in all muscles of mastication (temporalis, masseters, internal and external pterygoids). Range of motion of the temporomandibular joint is significantly reduced, and the baby is unable to latch on and open the mouth with proper nipple placement without gagging and choking. Temporalis muscles spasm may cause painful headaches in a newborn which causes excessive crying. Such problems of breastfeeding can be directly caused by temporomandibular imbalances. [34]

Under traumatic circumstances, the origin of pain may be arthrogenic. As delineated in the majority of the cases, there is, for example, hypertonic muscular activity associated with most restrictions in mandibular excursion. We must consider if the joint itself was injured (traction injury/ compression) or were the associated muscles the injured party? Whether as a direct result of injury or reflexogenic spasm, metabolism of the muscle is disturbed due to hypertonic or hypotonic activity, both affecting the flow of nutritive substances into the muscle and removal of metabolic byproducts or waste material into the vascular or lymphatic system through regular, unsustained, contractions. Muscular hypertonicity due to reflexogenic guarding (possibly in response to the original arthrogenic or muscular assault) will result in ischemia and pain. This plays a role in establishing a dysfunctional nursing pattern because of a cycle of pain resulting from repeated attempts to open the mouth to breastfeed. The infant is more likely to resist normal muscular action in anticipation of the pain. In the case of the infant with hypertonic mandibular attachments or temporomandibular joint injury, he will be less likely to open his mouth to accommodate the nipple because the motion of opening the jaw (and possibly closing the jaw) is painful.

Esch wrote a case report of a 2–day–old–infant who presented with an atlas subluxation presumably resulting from the biomechanical stress of prolonged labor with an oblique lie, with a presumably associated loss of rooting reflex. She demonstrated a quick restoration of the reflex immediately following the adjustment of atlas. [35] Esch also related a case in which nasal subluxation resulted in dyspnea, interfering with successful latch. The patient responded well to an adjustment of the nasal bones with immediate improvement in nasal breathing.

Neurologic integrity of the Glossopharyngeal nerve (CN IX), the Vagus (CN X) and the Hypoglossal Nerve (CN XII) are responsible for the innervation of the anatomical structures utilized in suckling. CN IX controls the muscles of the pharynx, CN X controls the muscles of the soft palate and CN XII controls the tongue muscles. The cranial nerves arise from the medullary portion of the brainstem and exit through the jugular foramen (CN IX and X) and the hypoglossal canal (CN XII). Disruption in the innervation to any of the associated structures would potentially interfere with the suckling process. For example, John Upledger, DO proposed that the hypoglossal nerve might be subject to injury or irritation by cranial subluxation as the nerve exits the hypoglossal canals high in the foramen magnum above the occipital condyles. Their exits are just lateral to the condyles. Dysfunction of the hypoglossal nerve will probably be secondary to problems of the occipital condyles and the atlanto–occipital joint. [36]

Hewitt [37] reviews three proposed mechanisms for altered cranial nerve function:

(a)   direct compression of the cranial nerves or medulla by abnormal cranial bone motion. Nerve compression has been shown to decrease nerve conduction velocities, decrease axoplasmic flow and create motor disturbances in related muscles. [38–40] This would be in concert with Upledger’s [41] proposed mechanism;

(b)   somato–autonomic reflexes caused by cervical subluxation could cause a change in vascular supply to the contents of the cranial vault affecting cranial nerve function or it may directly affect the superior cervical ganglia which communicate directly with the CN IX, X and XII, potentially altering their function resulting in abnormal suckling, and

(c)   cranial and cervical subluxation result in increased traction and tension in the dura mater potentially resulting in constriction of the dural sheath of the cranial nerves altering nerve and end organ function.



CONCLUSION

Observation of breastfeeding infants early in the neonatal period allows the chiropractor to determine the infant’s ability to root, latch onto and suckle the breast. Chiropractors may serve as effective members of an interdisciplinary team to identify and ameliorate biomechanical dysfunction before inappropriate imprinting or a disorganized suck is established. Cross professional education and communication will facilitate early referral and help establish a network of support for the new mother and infant.

Craniocervical subluxation is one of the most important conditions to rule out when addressing difficulties with breastfeeding whether manifesting as neurologic (rooting or suckling reflex, hypertonic musculature) or mechanical (reduced mandibular excursion, decreased cervical range of motion) dysfunction.

Chiropractic adjustments in the early stages of neurologic imprinting appear to safely and effectively address the craniocervical dysfunction and help restore natural, efficient suckling patterns for infants who are unable to successfully latch.



REFERENCES:

  1. Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk (RE972) Policy Statement,
    American Academy of Pediatrics,
    Pediatrics, 1997; 100(12): 1035–1039.

  2. Evidence for the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding,
    World Health Organization, Geneva:WHO, 1998.

  3. Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk (RE972) Policy Statement,
    American Academy of Pediatrics,
    Pediatrics, Pediatrics, 1997; 100(12): 1035–1039.

  4. Evidence for the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding,
    World Health Organization, Geneva:WHO, 1998.

  5. Glass RP, Wolf LS:
    Incoordination of sucking/swallowing, and breathing as
    an etiology for breastfeeding difficulty.
    J Hum Lact October 1994; 185–189.

  6. Anderson, GC, et al.
    Development of sucking in term infants from birth to four hours post birth.
    Res Nurse Health 1982;(5):21–27.

  7. Widstrom AM, et al.
    Gastric suction in healthy newborn infants.
    Acta Pediatr Scan 1987;76:566–572.

  8. Riordan J, Auerbach K.
    Breastfeeding and Human Lactation,
    Jones and Bartlett, 1993; 350–359.

  9. Cuhel J, Powell M.
    Chiropractic management of an infant patient experiencing colic and
    difficulty breastfeeding: a case report.
    J Clin Chir Ped 1997; 2(2): 150–154.

  10. Vallone S.
    Linking Craniocervical subluxation in infants with breastfeeding difficulties,
    ICA Review, July/August 1997; 43–47.

  11. Krauss L.
    Case study: infant’s inability to breastfeed.
    Chiro Pediatri 1994; 1(3):27.

  12. Hewitt EG.
    Chiropractic care for infants with dysfunctional nursing: a case series.
    J Clin Chir Ped 1999; 4(1): 241–244.

  13. Scheader W.
    Chiropractic management of an infant experiencing
    breastfeeding difficulties with colic: a case study.
    J Clin Chir Ped 1999; 4 (1): 245–247.

  14. Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk (RE972) Policy Statement,
    American Academy of Pediatrics,
    Pediatrics, 1997; 100(12): 1035–1039.

  15. Hewitt EG.
    Chiropractic care for infants with dysfunctional nursing: a case series.
    J Clin Chir Ped, 1999 4 (1): 241–244.

  16. Riordan J, Auerbach K.
    Breastfeeding and Human Lactation,
    Jones and Bartlett, 1993; 113–115.

  17. Fallon J.
    Textbook on Chiropractic and Pregnancy,
    International Chiropractors Association,
    Arlington, VA, 1994; 123–125.

  18. Lantz C.
    The vertebral subluxation complex,
    ICA Review Sept/October 1989;37–61.

  19. Upledger J.
    Craniosacral Therapy.
    Seattle, WA: Eastland Press, 1983

  20. Phillips CJ.
    Craniosacral Therapy.
    Pediatric Chiropractic, Anrig/Plaugher (eds).
    Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins 1988; 448–451.

  21. Schafer RC, Faye LJ,
    Motion Palpation and Chiropractic Technique
    The Motion Palpation Institute, Huntington Beach, CA, 1989.

  22. Riordan J, Auerbach K.
    Breastfeeding and Human Lactation,
    Jones and Bartlett, 1993; 357.

  23. Upledger J.
    Craniosacral Therapy.
    Seattle, WA: Eastland Press, 1983

  24. Phillips CJ.
    Craniosacral Therapy.
    Pediatric Chiropractic, Anrig/Plaugher (eds).
    Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1988; 448–451.

  25. Schafer RC, Faye LJ,
    Motion Palpation and Chiropractic Technique,
    The Motion Palpation Institute, Huntington Beach, CA, 1989.

  26. Upledger J.
    Craniosacral Therapy.
    Seattle, WA: Eastland Press, 1983

  27. Phillips CJ.
    Craniosacral Therapy.
    Pediatric Chiropractic, Anrig/Plaugher (eds).
    Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1988; 448–451.

  28. Davies, N.
    Adjusting children using the Logan Basic System.
    Chiropractic Pediatrics: A Clinical Handbook,
    Churchill Livingston, 2000; 381–390.

  29. Barnes J.
    Myofascial Release Seminars,
    222 West Lancaster Avenue, Paoli, PA..

  30. Hochschuler SH, Cotler HB, Guyer RD.
    Massage, Rehabilitation of the Spine, Science and Practice. 1st edition.
    St. Louis, MO: Mosby 1993; 467.

  31. Gutmann G.
    Blocked atlantal nerve syndrome in infants and small children,
    Manuelle Medizin, Springer–Verlag, 1987.

  32. Banks B, Beck RW, Columbus M.
    Sudden infant death syndrome: A literature review
    with chiropractic implications,
    J Manip Physiol Ther, 1987; 10(5):246–252.

  33. Arcadia V.
    Birth induced temporomandibular dysfunction;
    the most common cause of breastfeeding difficulties.
    In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Chiropractic and Pediatrics.
    International Chiropractors Association, 1993

  34. Esch S.
    Case reports in chiropractic pediatrics,
    ACA J Chiro 1988; (12):26–33.

  35. Upledger J, Vredevoogd JD.
    Craniosacral Therapy.
    Eastland Press, Inc., 1983; 257–258.

  36. Hewitt EG.
    Chiropractic care for infants with dysfunctional nursing: a case series.
    J Clin Chir Ped 1999. 4 (1): 241–244.

  37. Triano J, Luttges M.
    Subtle intermittent mechanical irritation of the sciatic nerves of mice.
    J Manip Physiol Ther 1998; 3(2):75–80.

  38. Haldeman S.
    Changes in the structure and action of the sciatic nerve caused by constriction.
    J Clin Chiro 1969.

  39. Christiansen J, Meyer J.
    Altered metabolic enzyme activities in slow twitch muscles due to induced sciatic neuropathy,
    J Manip Physiol Ther 1987; 10(5):227–231.

  40. Upledger J., Vredevoogd JD.
    raniosacral Therapy.
    Eastland Press, Inc., 1983; 257–258.

Return to PEDIATRICS

Since 10–11–2021

                       © 1995–2021 ~ The Chiropractic Resource Organization ~ All Rights Reserved