MATERNAL REPORT OF OUTCOMES OF CHIROPRACTIC CARE FOR INFANTS
 
   

Maternal Report of Outcomes of Chiropractic Care for Infants

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:
   Frankp@chiro.org
 
   

FROM:   J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 (Mar;   42 (3):   167–176 ~ FULL TEXT

Joyce E. Miller, DC, PhD, Heather A. Hanson, DC, MSc, Mandy Hiew, BA, Derek S. Lo Tiap Kwong, BA, Zicheng Mok, BA, Yun-Han Tee, BA

Outpatient Teaching Clinic,
AECC University College,
Bournemouth, Dorset, UK.
jmiller@aecc.ac.uk.


OBJECTIVE:   The purpose of this study was to investigate the report by mothers of their infants' condition before and after a trial of care provided by registered chiropractic clinicians in addition to ratings of satisfaction, cost of care, and reports of any adverse events or side effects. A second purpose was to report the demographic profile of infants who presented for care to 16 chiropractic clinics in the United Kingdom.

METHODS:   This observational study prospectively collected reports by mothers of their infants' demographic profiles and outcomes across several domains of infant behavior and their own mental state using the United Kingdom Infant Questionnaire. Participating registered chiropractors were recruited through the Royal College of Chiropractors annual meeting in January 2016, and 15 clinics and the Anglo-European College of Chiropractic University College teaching clinic volunteered to participate.

RESULTS:   In all, 2001 mothers completed intake questionnaires and 1092 completed follow-up forms. Statistically significant (P < .05) improvements were reported across all aspects of infant behavior studied, including feeding problems, sleep issues, excessive crying, problems with supine sleep position, infant pain, restricted cervical range of motion, and time performing prone positioning. Maternal ratings of depression, anxiety, and satisfaction with motherhood also demonstrated statistically significant improvement (P < .05). In total, 82% (n = 797) reported definite improvement of their infants on a global impression of change scale. As well, 95% (n = 475) reported feeling that the care was cost-effective, and 90.9% (n = 712) rated their satisfaction 8 or higher on an 11–point scale. Minor self-limiting side effects were reported (5.8%, n = 42/727) but no adverse events.

There are more articles like this @ our:

PEDIATRICS Section

CONCLUSION:   In this study, mothers reported that chiropractic care for their infants was effective, safe, and cost-effective. Although the observational design makes it impossible to determine efficacy, the study's findings indicate that, on average, the changes observed by mothers were positive and may be clinically relevant.

Key Indexing Terms:   Infant, Chiropractic, Complementary Therapies



From the FULL TEXT Article:

Introduction

An important development in health care in the past decade has been the increasing interest in patient-centered care emphasizing the patient’s own perspective on their illness and treatment. Patient-reported outcome measures are designed to assess a patient’s subjective impressions of their health with respect to symptoms, function, and health-related constructs such as health-related quality of life. [1, 2] The World Health Organization points out that involvement of the patient in their own health care is a social, economic, and technical necessity. [3] Although patient-reported outcome measures are important, using them for the pediatric patient is challenging whether they could be helpful to improve doctor–patient or doctor–parent communication and shared decision-making. [4]

Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used as tools for monitoring and quantifying a patient’s progress while undergoing treatment [5–7] and as outcomes in clinical trials. [8] Routine collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been suggested as a method of collecting large amounts of data to capture information about what occurs in routine clinical practice. [1] These large amounts of data may be used to measure quality of care and evaluate comparative effectiveness of treatments. [1, 2] Routine collection of PROs in chiropractic practice has been demonstrated to be feasible for adult patients [9, 10] and children, [11] allowing for collection of so-called big data. A similar approach involving routine collection of PROs for infants undergoing chiropractic care would seem a worthwhile endeavor in attempting to address the lack of research in this area. [13] Infants are common users of chiropractic care. [13–15] In such a vulnerable population, it seems crucial that research be conducted to determine the effect of treatment on the patient’s clinical condition and to measure safety and parental satisfaction. The chiropractic profession has been criticized for a lack of high-quality evidence to support the care of this population. [16–19]

To satisfy the demand for a parent-reported outcome measure, the United Kingdom Infant Questionnaire (UKIQ) was developed, based on maternal views of what is important in an infant’s health, and has been tested for reliability and validity. [20] Evidence suggests that mothers are reliable reporters of their infant’s behavior and therefore in the best position to provide insight into their child’s clinical situation. [21–23] The UKIQ collects both demographic information about the infant and maternal impressions across several domains of their infant’s behavior, including sleep, feeding, crying, inability to maintain a supine sleep position (a risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome), range of motion of the cervical spine, and use of prone positioning. [20]

Difficulty in these areas represents threats to the health of the infant and public health because they are considered risk factors for early cessation of breastfeeding [24] and impaired infant–parental bonding [25] and parental abuse [26] in the short term, and behavioral issues, developmental delay, [27–29] and continued sleep difficulties in the long term. [30] Mothers were also asked about their own mental state in relation to their child’s condition and experience of motherhood because maternal mental condition has been found to be key to the child’s health. [31]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the report by mothers about their infant’s condition before and after a trial of care provided by registered chiropractic clinicians in addition to maternal ratings of satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, and reports of any adverse events or side effects over the treatment period. A second purpose was to report the demographic profile of infants who presented for care to 16 chiropractic clinics in the United Kingdom.



Discussion

This is the first known large survey of baseline and follow-up characteristics of infant patients presented to chiropractic practices. More appropriate research designs are required to investigate actual efficacy of registered chiropractors’ care of infants. This study can only illuminate maternal reports of their perceptions of effect of care. Nevertheless, studies investigating efficacy might neglect to consider whether care results in clinically significant change, and it seems likely that parents themselves are in the best position to make this assessment. A recent systematic review indeed questioned whether the small benefits observed in studies of efficacy of manual therapy for crying and distressed infants translated into meaningful changes for parents. [32] Research of this nature is perhaps best suited to addressing this very relevant question. Mothers repeatedly have been found to be excellent reporters of their infant’s state of health, [21–23] and mothers, by and large, reported good recovery from the initial complaints in this study. The greatest reductions in maternal ratings were reported in the scale of the feeding problem of the infant and in the mother’s own anxiety level. It makes sense that these may go hand in hand because previous studies have found the maternal psychological experience is entwined with breastfeeding issues [33, 34] and inconsolable infant crying. [35]

Anxiety and depression have been widely researched and found to be prevalent and serious problems both ante- and postnatally and often linked to the feeding, crying, and sleeping issues of the newborn. [36–38] Providers of infant care are increasingly aware of both the prevalence and effects of postpartum depression on the family unit. [39] Research has shown that screening for depression improves clinical outcomes and that postpartum depression is exceedingly common, affecting an estimated 14% to 25% of mothers. [40]

Previous studies have shown that mothers report lower scores on validated anxiety and depression indices and better quality of life after their infant has received a course of treatment at a chiropractic clinic. [41, 42] It seems logical that being given an explanation for the etiology of the infant’s problem and observing a reduction in symptoms could be helpful in easing maternal distress. It has been reported elsewhere that mothers want specific contextualized help for their child and not simple reassurance that their condition is not a life-threatening concern. [43]

In all categories, change was observed in a direction that can be interpreted as a clinically favorable result. The concept of clinical significance of care can be difficult to determine. [44] Other studies have found that a shift of 35% or more in ratings of improvement is most likely clinically significant. [45] It is pertinent to suggest that mothers thought the care was beneficial owing to the consistently high ratings of satisfaction, improvement, and cost-effectiveness.

This study’s findings resembled those of previous research demonstrating that the effect of manual therapy for infants occurs within 2 weeks [46–50] and in 1 study after 1.1 treatments, with complete recovery after an average of 4 sessions. [46] This study was very similar, with a mode of 3 treatments and an average of 4 before release from care. A quick response to care has been suggested to be beneficial in alleviating distress and anxiety in parents. [46] The same early effect of treatment has been found in adults, although the mean number of treatments was higher (5.4) with a wider range (1–20 treatments in a 90–day span). [9] In cases where the natural history of the disorder is known, as in excessive crying that has been found to recover after 12 weeks [32] and up to 26 weeks, [51, 52] there is little question that the care was an improvement over the natural history.

The results reflected statistically significant improvements in complaints of infants such as crying, sleep, pain, breastfeeding, and inability to meet the guidelines for supine sleep. The shared etiology of these problems was musculoskeletal irritability and imbalance, which is common at all ages, but in infants can result from a difficult birth. [42, 47, 50] Manual therapy provided by chiropractors has been found effective in treating the musculoskeletal imbalances of infants, [46, 48] with modified treatments appropriate for the size and age of the child. [46, 53] There is also scientific background that manual touch therapy was found effective to reduce signs of pain in premature neonates using sophisticated brain studies. [54]

Like other studies, mothers reported very high levels of satisfaction with care, even if the baby did not totally recover. [55] Satisfaction ratings are complex and therefore should be interpreted with caution because they could be explained by many other confounding factors, [56] not least because the family appreciates the time and attention given to them and their baby. A factor more meaningful than satisfaction may be the positive report of cost-effectiveness. This concept has been found to be a part of patient-centered care and defined as clinical benefit for the amount of money spent. [57] Because this care took place in the UK where National Health Service care is free of charge and chiropractic treatment is not, it is interesting that mothers will still seek additional care, even with the additional financial burden. Zuzak et al [58] found that parents throughout Europe seek complementary or integrated therapies for children, with manual therapy the most commonly chosen. [15, 59]

      Limitations

The information collected was from the mothers’ impressions of care. No efficacy from care can be assigned from this study owing to lack of randomization or controls. However, the strength of this type of study lies in that the data came directly from the mothers and not from the caregivers, who have traditionally been the ones to determine whether a patient has benefited from care. The nature of these common complaints of infancy does not make them conducive to study using a double-blind, randomized design. Many infants may have experienced a combination of complaints. [60] Treatment often requires an approach customized to the individual patient, and few parents are willing to be blinded to the treatment received by their infant or whether treatment has been received. As such, this type of study presents real-world data as evidence, [61] which provides external validity not found in randomized controlled trials and thus is more applicable to heterogenous general patient populations than higher-level studies. [62]

The sample size was relatively large, and the response rate at over 50% was reasonable. A follow-up rate of 41% was reported in a successful routine PROs survey in the NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre. [7, 63] In research being conducted in a routine clinical setting, it may be unrealistic to expect higher follow-up rates. Follow-up is given as part of the normal patient management process, and this means that some patients will not have received the opportunity to complete a follow-up form owing to discontinuation from care before discharge, referral to another health professional at intake, or care being deemed unnecessary at intake. Others simply will not have progressed to a point in care where follow-up is appropriate and will therefore have completed only the intake at the close of the study period. This may be a downside of accessing real-world clinical evidence.

Data were collected anonymously, making it impossible to collect follow-up data from those who dropped out from treatment or pursue any further follow-up efforts if follow-up had not been completed. It could be expected that those who did not complete the follow-up may be precisely the mothers who are unhappy with care or did not complete treatment, and this is a weakness of this study because it is impossible to know what their potential responses would be. It might be worthwhile to consider including a more extensive follow-up process for future research to capture the impressions of these mothers, but this would bring with it the disadvantage of requiring collection of more personal information at intake, which is not common practice in this type of data collection. Specifically, future research might track which infants discontinued care, were referred for other medical care, or were not treated because care was deemed unnecessary. With these data, comparisons of ratings could be made between mothers who discontinued care and those who completed care. The absence of such data is a shortcoming of this study because no such comparison is possible.

In addition, the entire study consisted of a population attending chiropractic clinics, and this group has been shown to differ from the broader population. [64, 65] Although this study included 15 private chiropractic offices, data were also obtained from the AECC University College teaching clinic, and this may provide a skewed sample. [65, 66] These factors may limit the generalizability of the results to the general population of mothers and infants with complaints, even though this type of study is designed for improved external validity.

A lack of validated and pragmatic outcome measures designed specifically for the infant population has been considered an impediment to conducting high-quality research in well-baby infant quality of life care, but the UKIQ may be capable of addressing this barrier. Its feasibility for use in chiropractic practice has been demonstrated for both paper and electronic versions of the tool, [42] and an electronic version has been found technically capable of large-scale data collection in chiropractic practice. [67]

Whether the patient improves or not is fundamental to clinical practice. Parent report of outcomes allows the mother to determine whether the change, if any, that occurred during a course of care should be classed as improvement or not. This facilitates patient-centered care and provides valuable information for the clinician and when the sample size is large and applicable to a wider population, to health care decision-makers, as well. Although this study’s design was not capable of determining efficacy, its findings may provide insight into whether mothers perceive this care to be of value to their infant. This research reflected only the mother’s point of view, and higher levels of research such as randomized controlled trials are required to determine true efficacy of this type of care for infants.



Conclusion

This was the first study of its kind to investigate prospectively collected data provided by mothers regarding presentation and outcomes from treatment from a large cohort of infants presented for chiropractic care. The infant’s care was reported by the mothers who completed follow-up as effective, safe, and cost-effective.



Practical Applications

  • The findings of this study indicate that, on average, mothers report improvement in common complaints of infancy (crying, problematic feeding, sleeping, and pain) after chiropractic treatment along with improvements in their own mental state.

  • High maternal ratings for satisfaction and cost-effectiveness also were noted, and together these findings seem to indicate that on average, mothers note clinically important changes after chiropractic treatment of their infant.

  • This is the first large prospective study reporting parental report of effectiveness of routine chiropractic care for infants.



References:

  1. Black, N.
    Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare.
    BMJ. 2013; 346: f167

  2. Boyce, MB, Browne, JP, and Greenhalgh, J.
    The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve
    the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research.
    BMJ Qual Saf. 2014; 23: 508–518

  3. in: E Blas, A SivasankaraKurup (Eds.)
    Priority public health conditions: from learning to action on social determinants of health.
    World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2010

  4. Valderas, JM, Kotzeva, A, Espallargues, M et al.
    The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature.
    Qual Life Res. 2008; 17: 179–193

  5. Greenhalgh, J.
    The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?.
    Qual Life Res. 2009; 18: 115–123

  6. Hvitveld, H, Carli, C, Nelson, EC, Mortenson, DM, Ruppert, BA, and Lindblad, S.
    Patient reported outcome measures in practice.
    BMJ. 2009; 350: g7818–g7820

  7. Black, N, Burke, L, Forrest, CB et al.
    Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies.
    Qual Life Res. 2016; 25: 1103–1112

  8. Gossec, L, Dougados, M, and Dixon, W.
    Patient-reported outcomes as end points in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis.
    RMD Open. 2015; 1: e000019

  9. Newell, D, Diment, E, and Bolton, JE.
    An electronic patient-reported outcome measures system in UK chiropractic practices:
    a feasibility study of routine collection of outcomes and costs.
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016; 39: 31–41

  10. Field, JR and Newell, D.
    Clinical outcomes in a large cohort of musculoskeletal patients undergoing chiropractic care in the
    United Kingdom: a comparison of self- and national health service-referred routes.
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016; 39: 54–62

  11. Alcantara, J, Lamont, AE, Ohm, J, and Alcantara, J.
    The Quality of Life of Children Under Chiropractic Care Using PROMIS-25:
    lts from a Practice-Based Research Network

    J Altern Complement Med. 2018 (Apr);   24 (4):   378–384

  12. Clar C, Tsertsvadze A, Court R, Hundt G, Clarke A, Sutcliffe P.
    Clinical Effectiveness of Manual Therapy for the Management of Musculoskeletal and
    Non-Musculoskeletal Conditions: Systematic Review and Update of UK Evidence Report

    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 2014 (Mar 28);   22 (1):  12

  13. Hestbaek, L, Jørgensen, A, and Hartvigsen, J.
    A Description of Children and Adolescents in Danish Chiropractic Practice:
    Results from a Nationwide Survey

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 (Oct); 32 (8): 607–615

  14. Miller J.
    Demographic Survey of Pediatric Patients Presenting to a Chiropractic Teaching Clinic
    Chiropractic & Osteopathy 2010 (Dec 15); 18: 33

  15. Allen-Unhammer, A, Wilson, FJ, and Hestbaek, L.
    Children and Adolescents Presenting to Chiropractors in Norway:
    National Health Insurance Data and a Detailed Survey

    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 2016 (Aug 1); 24: 29

  16. Ernst, E.
    Chiropractic spinal manipulation for infant colic: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials.
    Int J Clin Pract. 2009; 63: 1351–1353

  17. Gotlib, A and Rupert, R.
    Chiropractic Manipulation in Pediatric Health Conditions - An Updated Systematic Review
    Chiropractic & Osteopathy 2008 (Sep 12); 16: 11

  18. Bronfort, G, Haas, M, Evans, R, Leininger, B, and Triano, J.
    Effectiveness of Manual Therapies: The UK Evidence Report
    Chiropractic & Osteopathy 2010 (Feb 25); 18 (1): 3

  19. Dobson, D, Lucassen, PLBJ, Miller, J, Vlieger, AM, Prescott, P, and Lewith, G.
    Manipulative therapies for infantile colic.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 12: CD004796

  20. Miller AS, Huizinga B, Pinkster M, Telford ACJ, ten Heggeler JM, Miller JE.
    Development and Testing of a Multidimensional Parent Reported Outcome Measure
    for Common Presenting Complaints of Infancy: The UK Infant Questionnaire

    Journal of Clinical Chiropractic Pedi­atrics 2016; 15(3):1292-1300

  21. Barr, RG, Kramer, MS, Boisjoly, C, McVey-White, L, and Pless, IB.
    Parental diary of infant cry and fuss behaviour.
    Arch Dis Child. 1988; 63: 380–387

  22. St. James-Roberts, I, Hurry, J, and Bowyer, J.
    Objective confirmation of crying durations in infants referred for excessive crying.
    Arch Dis Child. 1993; 68: 82–84

  23. von Kries, R, Kalies, H, and Papousek, M.
    Excessive crying beyond 3 months may herald other features of multiple regulatory problems.
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006; 160: 508–511

  24. Guyer, J, Millward, LJ, and Berger, I.
    Mothers’ breastfeeding experiences and implications for professionals.
    Br J Midwifery. 2012; 20: 724–733

  25. Oldbury, S and Adams, K.
    The impact of infant crying on the parent-infant relationship.
    Community Pract. 2015; 88: 29–34

  26. Zeifman, DM and St. James-Roberts, I.
    Parenting the crying infant.
    Curr Opin Psychol. 2017; 15: 149–154

  27. Johnson, K.
    Reduced tummy time can slow motor development.
    Med Post. 2003; 39: 51

  28. Schertz, M, Zuk, L, Zin, S, Nadam, L, Schwartz, D, and Bienkowski, RS.
    Motor and cognitive development at one-year follow-up in infants with torticollis.
    Early Hum Dev. 2008; 84: 9–14

  29. Smarius, LJ, Strieder, TG, Loomans, EM et al.
    Excessive infant crying doubles the risk of mood and behavioral problems at age 5:
    evidence for mediation by maternal characteristics.
    Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017; 26: 293–302

  30. Lam, P, Hiscock, H, and Wake, M.
    Outcomes of infant sleep problems: a longitudinal study of sleep, behavior and maternal well-being.
    Pediatrics. 2003; 111: e203–e207

  31. Chaudron, LH, Szilagyi, PG, Campbell, AT, Mounts, KO, and McInerny, TK.
    Legal and ethical considerations: risks and benefits of postpartum depression screening at well-child visits.
    Pediatrics. 2007; 119: 123–128

  32. Carnes D, Plunkett A, Ellwood J, Miles C.
    Manual Therapy for Unsettled, Distressed and Excessively Crying Infants:
    A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

    BMJ open. 2018 (Jan 224); 8 (1): e019040

  33. O’Brien, M, Buikstra, E, and Hegney, D.
    The influence of psychological factors on breastfeeding duration.
    J Adv Nurs. 2008; 63: 397–408

  34. Dennis, C and McQueen, K.
    The relationship between infant-feeding outcomes and postpartum depression:
    a qualitative systematic review.
    Pediatrics. 2009; 123: e736–e751

  35. Radesky, JS, Zuckerman, B, Silverstein, M et al.
    Inconsolable infant crying and maternal postpartum depressive symptoms.
    Pediatrics. 2013; 131: e1857–e1864

  36. Wake, M, Morton-Allen, E, Poulakis, Z, Hiscock, H, Gallagher, S, and Oberklaid, F.
    Prevalence, stability and outcomes of cry-fuss and sleep problems in the first 2 years of life:
    prospective community-based study.
    Pediatrics. 2006; 117: 836–884

  37. Lee, AM, Lam, SK, Sze Mun Lau, SM, Chong, CS, Chui, HW, and Fong, DY.
    Prevalence, course and risk factors for antenatal anxiety and depression.
    Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1102–1112

  38. Kurth, E, Kennedy, HP, Spichiger, E, Hösli, I, and Stutz, EZ.
    Crying babies, tired mothers: what do we know? A systematic review.
    Midwifery. 2011; 27: 187–194

  39. Stewart, D and Vigod, S.
    Postpartum depression.
    N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 2177–2187

  40. Gaynes, BN, Gavin, N, Meltzer-Brody, S et al.
    Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy and screening outcomes.
    Evid Rep Technology Assess (Summ). 2005; : 1–8

  41. Marillier, KE, Lima, AM, Donovan, LY, Taylor, C, and Miller, J.
    Mama, please stop crying: lowered postnatal depression scores in mothers after a course
    of chiropractic care for their infants.
    J Clin Chiropr Pediatr. 2014; 14: 1179–1182

  42. Schmid, PN, Hetlevik, MA, and Miller, J.
    Infant presentations and outcomes at a chiropractic clinic in the UK:
    parent report of treatment outcomes using the United Kingdom Infant Questionnaire (UKIQ).
    J Clin Chiropr Pediatr. 2016; 15: 1237–1242

  43. Miller, A, Telford, A, Huizing, B, Pinkster, M, ten Heggler, J, and Miller, J.
    What breastfeeding mothers want: specific contextualized help.
    Clin Lactation. 2015; 6: 117–121

  44. Hurst, H and Bolton, J.
    Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures.
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004; 27: 26–35

  45. Bolton, J.
    Sensitivity and specificity of outcomes measures in patients with neck pain:
    detecting clinically significant improvement.
    Spine. 2004; 29: 2410–2417

  46. Miller, J, Newell, D, and Bolton, J.
    Efficacy of chiropractic manual therapy in infant colic: a pragmatic single-blind,
    randomised controlled trial.
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012; 35: 600–607

  47. Miller, J. E., Miller, L., Sulesund, A. K., & Yevtushenko, A.
    Contribution of Chiropractic Therapy to Resolving Suboptimal Breastfeeding:
    A Case Series of 114 Infants

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009 (Oct); 32 (8): 670–674

  48. Wiberg, JM, Nordsteen, J, and Nilsson, N.
    The Short-term Effect of Spinal Manipulation in the Treatment of Infantile Colic:
    A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial with a Blinded Observer

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999 (Oct); 22 (8): 517–522

  49. Klougart N, Nilsson N, Jacobsen J.
    Infantile Colic Treated by Chiropractors: A Prospective Study of 316 Cases
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1989 (Aug); 12 (4): 281–288

  50. Jaskulski, JM and Miller, JE.
    Infant demographic profile and parent report of treatment outcomes at a chiropractic clinic in the UK:
    an observational study.
    J Clin Chiropr Pediatr. 2018; 17: 1398–1404

  51. Reijneveld, SA, Brugman, E, and Hirasing, RA.
    Excessive infant crying: the impact of varying definitions.
    Pediatrics. 2001; 108: 893–897

  52. Wurmser, H, Laubereau, B, Hermann, M, Papousek, M, and von-Kries, R.
    Excessive infant crying: often not confined to the first 3 months of age.
    Early Hum Dev. 2001; 64: 1–6

  53. Marchand AM.
    A Proposed Model With Possible Implications for Safety and Technique Adaptations
    for Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Infants and Children

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2015 (Nov); 38 (9): 713–726

  54. Honda, N, Ohgi, S, Wada, N, Loo, KK, Hagashimoto, Y, and Fukuda, K.
    Effect of therapeutic touch on brain activation of preterm infants in response to sensory punctate
    stimulus: near-infrared spectroscopy-based study.
    ADC Fetal Neonatal Edition. 2013; 98: F244–F249

  55. Navrud, IM, Bjornli, ME, Feier, CH, Haugse, T, and Miller, J.
    A Survey of Parent Satisfaction with Chiropractic Care of the Pediatric Patient
    J Clinical Chiro Pediatrics 2014 (Nov); 14 (3): 1167–1171

  56. Smith, MJ and Choma, TJ.
    Patient satisfaction in musculoskeletal medicine.
    Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017; 10: 207–211

  57. Marzorati, C and Pravettoni, G.
    Value as the key concept in the health care system.
    J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017; 10: 101–106

  58. Zuzak, TJ, Bo?ková, J, Careddu, D et al.
    Use of complementary and alternative medicine by children in Europe:
    published data and expert perspectives.
    Complement Ther Med. 2013; : S34–S47

  59. Black, LI, Clarke, TC, Barnes, PM, Stussman, BJ, and Nahin, RL.
    Use of Complementary Health Approaches Among Children Aged 4–17 Years
    in the United States: National Health Interview Survey, 2007–2012

    National Health Statistics Report 2015 (Feb 10); (78): 1–19

  60. Hemmi, MH, Wolke, D, and Schneider, S.
    Associations between problems with crying, sleeping and/or feeding in infancy and long-term
    behavioural outcomes in childhood: a meta-analysis.
    Arch Dis Child. 2011; 96: 622–629

  61. Katkade, VB, Sanders, KN, and Zou, KH.
    Real world data: an opportunity to supplement existing evidence for the use of long-established
    medicines in health care decision making.
    J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018; 11: 295–304

  62. ABPI.
    The vision for real world data – harnessing the opportunities in the UK. (Available at:)
    http://www.abpi.org.uk/media/1378/vision-for-real-world-data.pdf
    Date accessed: January 5, 2018

  63. Malhotra, K, Buraimoh, O, Thornton, J, Cullen, N, Singh, D, and Goldberg, AJ.
    Electronic capture of patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures in an elective
    orthopaedic setting: a retrospective cohort analysis.
    BMJ Open. 2016; 6: e011975

  64. Hurwitz, EL, Coulter, ID, Adams, AH, Genovese, BJ, and Shekelle, PG.
    Use of chiropractic services from 1985 through 1991 in the United States and Canada.
    Am J Public Health. 1998; 88: 771–776

  65. Amorin-Woods, LG, Parkin-Smith, GF, Nedkoff, L, and Fisher, C.
    Outcomes of a pilot study in chiropractic practices in Western Australia.
    Chiropr Man Ther. 2016; 24: 34

  66. Lishchyna, N and Mior, S.
    Demographics and clinical characteristics of new patients presenting to a community teaching clinic.
    J Chiropr Educ. 2012; 26: 161–168

  67. Newell D, Diment E and Bolton JE.
    An Electronic Parent Reported Infant Outcome Measure in Chiropractic Clinics:
    A Feasibility Study

    J Clinical Chiropractic Pediatrics 2017 (Sep); 16(1): 1355–1361



Return to the PEDIATRICS Section

Since 7-01-2019

                       © 1995–2019 ~ The Chiropractic Resource Organization ~ All Rights Reserved