GRADE: An Emerging Consensus on Rating Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations
Brit Med J 2008 (Apr 26); 336 (7650): 924–926 ~ FULL TEXT
Gordon H Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Gunn E Vist,
Regina Kunz, Yngve Falck-Ytter
G H Guyatt
CLARITY Research Group,
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
Room 2C12, 1200 Main Street,
West Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5
Guidelines are inconsistent in how they rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. This article explores the advantages of the GRADE system, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide.
From the FULL TEXT Article
| Summary points
Guideline developers around the world are inconsistent in how they rate quality of evidence and grade strength of recommendations. As a result, guideline users face challenges in understanding the messages that grading systems try to communicate. Since 2006 the BMJ has requested in its “Instructions to Authors” on bmj.com that authors should preferably use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for grading evidence when submitting a clinical guidelines article. What was behind this decision?
There are more articles like this @ our: